Preview

Liberalism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
19753 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberalism
The Essay will be four pages single-spaced and will be based directly on the material in this document. Students may also use the relevant PowerPoints as well as the Bond Text - that is all that is permitted. The essay question is as follows: Compare and contrast modern conservatism and modern liberalism. Check the syllabus for the due date but you must get started on it straight away!

Failure to do the following will result in the paper being returned ungraded. a. type the online course number and name on top of the page or title page. b. type the question at the top of the page or title page. c. When you are citing material from this document simply use the following format: (Guide, Pg#) and (PP Modern Liberalism) etc...d. Have an additional copy for your files (on disk or whatever). e. Four pages typed and single-spaced in length. DON’TS 1. DO NOT COPY ALL OR IN PART ANOTHER PERSON’S ESSAY 2. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE OR ONLY SLIGHTLY PARAPHRASE MATERIAL. 3. DO NOT BE A QUOTEMONGER (i.e. do not make the essay a long series of quotes from the books).

Please be fair and proportionate – each side in politics sees itself as the only moral and just side. Don’t be fooled by such infantile indulgence. Try to see the major ideas of each ideology as honestly held and legitimate even if you disagree wholeheartedly with them.

Liberalism
First published Thu Nov 28, 1996; substantive revision Mon Sep 10, 2007
As soon as one examines it, ‘liberalism’ fractures into a variety of types and competing visions. In this entry we focus on debates within the liberal tradition. We begin by (1) examining different interpretations of liberalism 's core commitment — liberty. We then consider (2) the longstanding debate between the ‘old’ and the ‘new’ liberalism. In section (3) we turn to the more recent controversy about whether liberalism is a ‘comprehensive’ or a ‘political’ doctrine. We close in (4) by considering disagreements as to ‘the



Bibliography: Beitz, Charles (1997). Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Benn, Stanley I. (1988). A Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bentham, Jeremy (1952 [1795]). Manual of Political Economy in Jeremy Bentham 's Economic Writings W. Stark, ed. London: Allen and Unwin. Bentham, Jeremy (1970 [1823]). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, J. H. Burns and H. L. A. hart, eds. London: Athlone Press. Berlin, Isaiah (1969). ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in his Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 118-72. Beveridge, William (1944). Full Employment in a Free Society. London: Allen and Unwin. Bird, Colin (1999). The Myth of Liberal Individualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bosanquet, Bernard (2001 [1923]). Philosophical Theory of the State in Philosophical Theory of the State and Related Essays, Gerald F. Gaus and William Sweet, eds. Indianapolis: St. Augustine Press. Buchanan James M. and Gordon Tullock (1966). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Chapman, John W. (1977). ‘Toward a General Theory of Human Nature and Dynamics’ in NOMOS XVII: Human Nature in Politics, J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, eds. New York: New York University Press: 292-319. Christman, John and Joel Anderson, eds. (2005). Autonomy and Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cranston, Maurice (1967). ‘Liberalism’ in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Paul Edwards, ed. New York: Macmillan and the Free Press: 458-461. Dagger, Richard (1997). Civic Virtue: Rights, Citizenship and Republican Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dewey, John (1929). Characters and Events, Joseph Ratner, ed., New York: Henry Holt. Dworkin, Gerald (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dworkin, Ronald (2000). Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Eberle, Christopher J. (2002). Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ely, James W. Jr (1992). The Guardian of Every Other Right: A Constitutional History of Property Rights. New York: Oxford University Press. Feinberg, Joel (1984). Harm to Others. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Freeden, Michael (1978). The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Galston, William (1980). Justice and the Human Good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Galston, William (2003). ‘Parents, Governments and Children: Authority Over Education in the Liberal Democratic State’ in NOMOS XLIV: Child, Family and The State, Stephen Macedo and Iris Marion Young, eds. New York: New York University Press: 211-233. Gaus, Gerald F. (1983a). The Modern Liberal Theory of Man. New York: St. Martin 's Press. Gaus, Gerald F. (1983b). ‘Public and Private Interests in Liberal Political Economy, Old and New’ in Public and Private in Social Life, S.I. Benn and G.F. Gaus, eds. New York: St. Martin 's Press: 183-221. Gaus, Gerald F. (1994). ‘Property, Rights, and Freedom,’ 11 Social Philosophy and Policy: 209-40. Gaus, Gerald F. (1996). Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Gaus, Gerald F. (2000). Political Concepts and Political Theories. Boulder, CO: Westview. Gaus, Gerald F. (2003). ‘Backwards into the Future: Neorepublicanism as a Postsocialist Critique of Market Society’, 20 Social Philosophy & Policy: 59-92. Gaus, Gerald F. (2004). ‘The Diversity of Comprehensive Liberalisms ’ in The Handbook of Political Theory, Gerald F. Gaus and Chandran Kukathas, eds. London: Sage: 100-114. Gauthier, David (1986). Morals By Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Green, Thomas Hill (1986 [1895]). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Essays, Paul Harris and John Morrow, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Greenawalt, Kent (1995). Private Consciences and Public Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press. Gutmann, Amy (1985). ‘Communitarian Critics of Liberalism’, 14 Philosophy & Public Affairs: 308-22. Hampton, Jean (1989) ‘Should Political Philosophy by Done without Metaphysics?’ 99 Ethics: 791-814. Hayek, F.A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F.A. (1976). The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F.A. (1978). ‘Liberalism’ in his New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Hobbes, Thomas (1948 [1651]). Leviathan, Michael Oakeshott, ed. Oxford: Blackwell. Hobhouse, L. T. (1918). The Metaphysical Theory of the State. London: Allen and Unwin. Hobson, J.A. (1922). The Economics of Unemployment. London: Allen and Unwin. Kant, Immanuel, (1965 [1797]). The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, John Ladd, trans. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Kant, Immanuel, (1970 [1795]) ‘Perpetual Peace’ in Kant 's Political Writings, Hans Reiss, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kavka, Gregory S. (1986). Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Keynes, John Maynard (1972). ‘The End of Laissez-Faire’in his Essays in Persuasion. London: Macmillan. Keynes, John Maynard (1973 [1936]). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London and Cambridge: Macmillan and Cambridge University Press. Kukathas, Chandran (2003). The Liberal Archipelago. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kymlicka, Will (1989). Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Larmore, Charles (1996). The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Larmore, Charles (2001). ‘A Critique of Philip Pettit 's Republicanism’, 35 Nous-Supplement: 229-243. Larmore, Charles (2004). ‘Liberal and Republican Conceptions qof Freedom’ in Republicanism: History, Theory, and Practice, D. Weinstock and C. Nadeau, eds. London: Frank Cass: 96-119. Locke, John (1960 [1689]). The Second Treatise of Government in Two Treatises of Government, Peter Laslett, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 283-446. Locke, John (1975 [1706]). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Peter H. Nidditch, ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press. Lomasky, Loren E. (1987). Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community. New York: Oxford University Press. Lomasky, Loren E. (2007). ‘Liberalism Without Borders’ in Liberalism: Old and New, Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller and Jeffrey Paul, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press: 206-233 Machiavelli, Niccolo (1950 [1513]) Mack, Eric and Gerald F. Gaus. (2004) ‘Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism: The Liberty Tradition’ in The Handbook of Political Theory, Gerald F. Gaus and Chandran Kukathas, eds. London: Sage: 115-130. Margalit, Avishai, and Joseph Raz (1990). ‘National Self-Determination,‘ 87 Journal of Philosophy: 439-61. Mill, John Stuart (1963). Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Miller, David (2002). ‘Two Ways to Think about Justice’, 1 Politics, Philosophy and Economics: 5-28. Mummery A. F. and J. A. Hobson (1956). The Physiology of Industry. New York: Kelly and Millman. Nozick, Robert. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books . Nussbaum, Martha (2002). ‘Women and Law of Peoples’, 1 Politics, Philosophy and Economics: 283-306. Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred D. Miller and Jeffrey Paul, eds. (2007). Liberalism: Old and New. New York: Cambridge University Press. Perry, Michael J. (1993). ‘Religious Morality and Political Choice: Further Thoughts— and Second Thoughts — on Love and Power’, San Diego Law Review, vol. 30 (Fall): 703-727. Pettit, Philip (1996). ‘Freedom as Antipower’, 106 Ethics: 576-604. Pettit, Philip (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pogge, Thomas W. (1989). Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Pogge, Thomas W. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Popper, Karl (1945). The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Rawls, John (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Rawls, John (1999a). Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Rawls, John (1999b). A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Rawls, John (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Erin Kelly, ed. New York: Columbia University Press. Raz, Joseph (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Raz, Joseph (1990). ‘Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence,’ 19 Philosophy & Public Affairs: 3-46. Reiman, Jeffrey (1990). Justice and Modern Moral Philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Ritchie, D.G. (1896). Principles of State Interference, 2nd, edn. London: Swan Sonnenschein. Robbins, L. (1961). The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy. London: Macmillan. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1973 [1762]). The Social Contract and Discourses, G.D.H. Cole, trans. New York: Dutton. Sandel, Michael. (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Scanlon, Thomas (1982) ‘Contractualism and Utilitarianism’ in Utilitarianism and Beyond, Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 103-28. Scanlon, T.M. (1998) What We Owe Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Spencer, William (1995 [1851]). Social Statics. New York: Robert Schalkenback Foundation. Skinner, Quentin (1998). Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spector, Horacio (1992). Autonomy and Rights: The Moral Foundations of Liberalism. Oxford: Clarendon. Steiner, Hillel (1994). An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Swaine, Lucas (2006). The Liberal Conscience. New York: Columbia University Press. Tamir, Yael (1993). Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Tawney, R. H. (1931). Equality. New York: Harcourt. Brace. Taylor, Charles (1992). Multiculturalism and The Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Viroli, Maurizio (2002). Republicanism, A. Shugaar, trans. New York: Hill and Wang. von Humboldt, Wilhelm (1993 [1854]). The Limits of State Action. Indianapolis: Liberty Press. Wall, Steven (1998). Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    *Dumbauld, Edward. The Bill of Rights and What It Means Today. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1979.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goodin, R., Pettit, P. and Pogge, T. (eds) (2008) A companion to contemporary political philosophy. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell (an imprint of John Wiley & Sons Ltd).…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sam Patch

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Foner, Eric. Give Me Liberty! An American History. 2nd ed. 1. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2008. Print.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WEEK 1 QUIZ 1

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The answer can be found in the section “How Does Contemporary Liberalism Compare with Classical Liberalism?”…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Foner, Eric. Give Me Liberty! An American History. Seagull 3rd ed. Vol 1. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc, 2012. 481-486. Print…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Liberalism “defined themselves in opposition to conservatives on one end of the political spectrum and revolutionaries on the other” (page 680). It supported freedom of religion, movement, conscience, assembly, and the press. In ensured equality for every man before law and God. In person has an equal opportunities for success or failure. Even though Liberalism was not a political movement, followers still believed that a good government had a balance of power between branches, property restrictions for representative government, and representatives were educated and successful.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberal Arts and Business

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the article Said another way, Halter and Polet (2002) discuss the history of a liberal…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern Liberalism

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. How liberalism was imposed on a nation state or group and degree to which this implementation benefited or harmed the people under this imposition of liberalism?…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: MAJEROL, V., & Liptak, A. (2011). The Bill of Rights, Then & Now. New York Times Upfront, 144(7), 18-21.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Morris, Robert K. “ The Bitter Fruits of Freedom.” Anthony Burgess. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, NY: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. 37-49. Print.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Foner, E. (2006). Give ME Liberty! An American History. New York: W.W Norton & Company Ltd.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political liberalism is a revised version of John Rawls’ premise centered on the decency of human-beings and seeks to address the state of confusion imposed between the state and its citizens by the dictate of classical liberalism. It seeks to build harmony between and amongst of varying schools of thoughts; the concept of liberty in itself do not make an individual absolutely free instead liberty should rely on the mechanism of the state in order to thrive. In other words, the concept of liberty to really manifest, there must be a general consensus in how an individual’s freedom is not restricted or denied by government laws and policies and as such the freedom of others is not also taken advantage of. Liberty can be dissected as either positive or negative, and are both realized through democratic processes (Liberalism: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberalism

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liberalism is essentially a 19th century political viewpoint or ideology associated with strong support for a broad interpretation of civil liberties for freedom of expression and religious toleration, for widespread popular participation in the political process, and for the repeal of protectionist legal restrictions inhibiting the operation of a capitalist free market economy. In the 20th century US, the term has come to describe an ideology with similar views on civil liberties and personal freedom issues but now supporting a much stronger role for government in regulating and manipulating the private economy and providing public support for the economically and socially disadvantaged, though still stopping well short of full socialism. In its purest form, it is not for the collective to decide what is good for all under liberalism; on the contrary, it is up to the individual to decide what is best for him/herself and do what best fills these needs.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Absolute and Relative Gain

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This essay addresses the question about the difference between relative and absolute gains within the neo-liberal body of thought. The terms ‘relative ’and absolute gains will be explained, and there will be examples given between absolute and relative gain. Furthermore there will be a description and analyze of relative and absolute gain in global society. This will be done with a link to the main thinkers of neo-liberalism. In the conclusion I will give my own opinion on the topic and a short summary of the facts stated before.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Steger& Roy (2010) NEO LIBERISALISM- A VERY SHORT INTRODUCTION. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays