Explain the sources of Malaysian legal system | Law Teacherhttp://www.lawteacher.net/constitutional-law/essays/explain-the-sources-of-malaysian-legal-system-constitutional-law-essay.php#ixzz2xMETkyAV@lawteachernet on Twitter
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.…
- 270 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
A) Early English law sought not only to deter crime and immoral behaviour but to exert social control, particularly over the lesser mortals, nothing changes.…
- 519 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
What we are concerned about in this regard is the JUSTIFICATION for the decisions reached by our various courts of law, and the principles of law applied by lawyers in relation to commercial and business practices. Laws are created by lawyers, commercial and business law is created by commercial lawyers, but it is business men and women who must abide by, apply and work within it.…
- 4681 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Since the very beginning of the human era the particular rules were necessary for every pre-historian community to exist as the main principles of fair trade, the property, the state of the person in the society and moral standards needed to be defined. In our days these rules are commonly referred as law. Primitive pre-historian communities were reliant on customary law systems; however, the rise of first civilizations and writing systems caused the written law to appear. Nowadays each country has its own law. One of the oldest law systems in Europe belongs to England. There are three main sources of English law: European law, Parliament and The common law.…
- 766 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006…
- 3086 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It is important to understand the differences between civil cases and criminal cases. Since civil cases cover a wide range there cannot be a very specific definition which will cover all of them, but a basic definition for civil claims is to say that these arise when an individual or a business believes that their rights have been infringed in some way. Some of the main areas of civil law are:…
- 1196 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There is no enforceable contract between Joanna and Rita because under Contract Law it is stated that the first requirement for any valid contract to become existent is an agreement that contains the elements of “offer” and an “acceptance”. In the case provided, Joanna did put forth an offer for Rita who then laid a condition of accepting the offer, therefore a counter-offer; also Rita had not yet accepted the offer completely. She stated in her response, that she would confirm her acceptance of the offer by Monday. In this situation, where offer was made by Joanna to Rita, as Rita had not yet accepted the offer or put forth a counter-offer to the original offer, Joanna was in her right to terminate the counter-offer for whatever reason suited her. As per contract law, termination of offer occurs in a number of ways: (1) revocation, (2) rejection, (3) failure to accept on time, (4) death and (5) failure of condition. In Joanna’s termination of the offer we have rejection as an element as well as the fact that she received a better offer from another candidate. “Rejection can take the form of an outright refusal or a counter-offer - that is, a purported acceptance but on different terms. Even if the different terms are immaterial the counter-offer will be treated as a rejection and new offer. As a result, it is important to distinguish counter-offers from mere requests for further information. To be effective rejection must be communicated; the postal rule does not apply to letters of rejection.” (Australiancontractlaw.com, 2013) Seeing as there was inevitably no acceptance of the original offer and the counter-offer presented was optional for Joanna to accept or reject, we can conclude that there was no enforceable contract in this case.…
- 1178 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The term "common law" originally derives from the 1150s and 1160s, when Henry II of England established the secular English tribunals. The "common law" was the law that emerged as "common" throughout the realm (as distinct from the various legal codes that preceded it, such as Mercian law, the Danelaw and the law of Wessex)[43] as the king's judges followed each other's decisions to create a unified common law throughout England. The doctrine of precedent developed during the 12th and 13th centuries,[44] as the collective judicial decisions that were based in tradition, custom and precedent.[45]…
- 1140 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The origin of English Common in the 12th century was sparked by the death of King Henry I in 1135. The nephew of Henry I was Stephen, and he was acknowledged to be the rightful king, but the magnates and such had sworn loyalty to Henry's daughter, Matilda. The entire reign of Stephen, which lasted from 1135 to 1154, was spent fighting with Matilda and her French husband. Upon Stephen's death the son of Matilda, Henry II, became king in 1154. It was from here on that the King started to take noticeable interest in the dealings of the court system, and put in to place a royal system instead of allowing the lords to deal with all matters in feudal courts.1 According to F. W. Maitland,…
- 4003 Words
- 17 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Critically discuss the doctrine of judicial precedent of the Malaysian legal system with the current role.…
- 4815 Words
- 20 Pages
Best Essays -
- There are constitutions of the 13 States comprising the Federation, which form part of the written law in Malaysia.…
- 4803 Words
- 20 Pages
Better Essays -
English Law is part of Malaysian law. The definition of law in Article 160 of the Federal Constitution includes ‘the common law in so far as it is in operation in the Federation or any part thereof’. That qualification concerns the extent to which English Law is applicable in Malaysia.…
- 3602 Words
- 15 Pages
Better Essays -
Although Malaysia was a country that practice democracy, but the freedom of speech by every lawmaker was still need to be monitored by the Sedition Act. This is very important because the uncensored speech by the lawmakers can lead to the misunderstanding and more series is also to resulting in fights between the politicians. This is very important to be pay attention because there are many political parties in Malaysia that have their…
- 1711 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The court system in Malaysia, was last restructured by the Constitution (Amendment) Act 1994. The present court structure, which has been in force since then, is as follows:…
- 474 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The law relating to companies in Malaysian is contained in the Companies Act, 1965. This Act is based on the English Companies Act 1948 and the Australian Uniform companies Act 1961. It is due in these historical ties, that the English and Australian Law has some significance on Malaysian Company Law. This is why you will see English and Australian judicial precedents being referred to, and applied in interpreting certain provisions of the Malaysian Companies Act.…
- 3552 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays