Preview

A good god

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A good god
The humorists

“A good god would exclude evil’’

Many philosophers including David Hume took many topics very serious. One of them was god. Could there possibly be a man so powerful and wise, but yet unfair enough to create a world so unbalanced, and evil? “The human mind is incapable of understanding the nature of god’’ (David Hume)

According to Hume the striving for survival; self-deprivation, the limited powers of all creatures to confront their problems, the laws of nature, and the weird events in nature are the four conditions or circumstances. If there is such perfect being as a god why not create the perfect world where there is no such thing as pain? He argues that instead there should always be the feeling of pleasure, and comfort. Why did he make accidents possible? Why do people have to go through such pain? Instead of tragic events he could interfere and save people from having to go through these kind of situations. There is so many evil souls roaming around hurting people, could he not avoid this? The world would have turned out so much better if god had made everyone good. Life would have been more peaceful, but is he even powerful enough to change any of this? Is he able to and not want to?

Also the limited powers of all creatures seems to be unfair. If god created this world why did he give animals more abilities that men could have used them more diligently? Perhaps he could have given men the complete power, and given them both intelligence and strength? Or why didn’t he make us all equal? Another argument David Hume makes is the extremes nature has caused. Why not just rain instead of hurricanes, hot instead of drought? Why does it always have to go to the extremes? Could he possibly have created this world this way to make us appreciate the good from the bad? Maybe to recognize the feeling of happiness after feeling unhappy. This is possibly the best explanation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    J.L. Mackie’s, “Evil and Omnipotence,” criticizes the debate for the existence of God by arguing that the fundamentals of what a “perfect God” is are inconsistent with one another. The main theological doctrines of what a “perfect God” entails are as followed: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. J.L. Mackie rejects this by stating God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent if evil exists. He asserts that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists. Mackie soon reaches the debate question of, “Can a perfect God exist when suffering exists?”…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evil, how did it happen and why is it still here on this earth? There is this belief that the Christian God is good and all-powerful. He has the power to create worlds and beings, yet there is still evil in the world. Both Pierre Bayle and Voltaire address these questions in their works “Paulicians” and Candide (respectively). They both believe the Manichean philosophy as a more rational thought process than the contemporaneous Christian view. This belief is that there is not one, but two gods in the world; a god of good and a god of evil. I myself believe in a world of balance and like the two authors listed above, accept this as more rational thought than a single omnipotent god. My reasoning is that without evil, there is no concept of good,…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Irenaeus’ original theory is based on his interpretation of Genesis 1:26 ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness’. From this Irenaeus concluded that first humans were made in the image of God and are only intended to develop later into his likeness through willing cooperation. This cooperation however requires genuine freedom, as it is not possible to willingly cooperate when something is forced upon us. The freedom is the reason why evil has to exist in the world; our ability to choose to do evil instead of good makes us free. There would be no such freedom if humans were created already perfect and God policed his world continually as there would be no capacity for us to choose evil and so no free will. Therefore, the natural order had to be designed with the possibility of causing harm, humans had to be created only in the image of God, and God has to keep an epistemic distance from his creation. Eventually, however, evil and suffering will be overcome and everyone will develop into the likeness of God, living in glory in heaven.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One is that while human creations and parts of nature are very similar they are also very different. Human creations are just as complex as nature. Nature, however, is far superior because it is self-perpetuating. The woodpecker’s tongue is incredibly complex and the woodpecker’s offspring will have the same complex tongue and on and on. These parts of nature can go on and on without the designers help while human creations require constant upkeep and guidance. Watches will sooner or later lose time or gears will rust or break and require a designer’s repair. This is one of the key differences that separate God’s designs from that of human’s. Another difference is that everything that humans create serves one or two distinct purposes. Human artifacts are created with those distinct purposes in mind though when we look at our solar system or Earth and at humans and animals there are an infinite number of possible purposes. The final question of this objection is: does it matter if God is finite and imperfect? This designer obviously has much more power and intelligence than that of humans and being finite and imperfect should not hinder its ability to create. If God is infinite and imperfect, why would he use his infinite and perfect power to create such flawed beings as humans? The objection dealing with the conclusion of multiple Gods asks the same question as the first objection. What is changed by the conclusion of multiple Gods? Robert Hambourger talks about this in his article titled “Can Design Arguments Be Defended Today”. In it, he talks about the great achievement that it would be to prove that the natural phenomena were created by intentional action, even if it could not be proved to have been done by a single entity (286). Ultimately, it should not matter what created our known universe as much as if our universe was created. Therefore, the objections to design arguments…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For my paper I want to argue that Blackburn is wrong for claiming that the existence of evil calls for a God that isn’t all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful. What brought me to this conclusion is his inability to look at things from different perspectives which can cloud or mislead judgement. Blackburn’s main argument is that we evidently face evil in our world so clinging onto the idea of our God being perfect becomes more and more difficult the more you look into it. To support this argument, he brings up an example of a management team working at a school that purposely allows their students to suffer but never interferes and fixes the problem.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Blackburn Wrong

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Being human is much more than being logical machines that thrive under the concept of survival; we feel, in fact emotions that could as well be consider the counterpart to rationality and the very flame of free will itself. Computers are the closest things that come remotely near to us in comparison, but the two things that separates us from our own invention is not only rational thought of our own, but also our ability to connect and interact with our surroundings at a much more emotional level. Things like empathy, and morals are hardly understood without a base of emotion that later derives into ethics which brings me to my next point. It is true that it may seem at first that an all knowing, all powerful, and all good god who has the means to stop all suffering may seem evil because he possesses the means and the willingness and yet crosses his arms, but Blackburn fails to realized that as he mentioned before, if we are a design of God created in his own imagine, is it wrong to assume that he too possesses emotions? No, this would not only explain why an all-powerful and all good might be at odds at stepping in, how could a father have a favorite amongst his children.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 13 Essay

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As my second part of the final essay I chose the questions from chapter 13. I will discuss the following questions in this essay: Is it possible that what one feels about the problem of evil depends largely on one’s prior beliefs on the existence of God? Isn’t it likely that a theist will find a solution to the problem? Isn’t it likely that an atheist will see it as disproving God’s existence? What side of the fence are you on concerning the question of God’s existence, and what difference does it make in your own view of the problem of evil? First I want to quote Hume and the most famous way the problem of evil is stated: “Is he willing to prevent evil,…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem of Evil- Notes

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since we have sufficient direct experience to support the existence of evil, if God exists he is either an impotent God or a malicious God; not the God of classical theism. Hume concluded that God therefore does not exist.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the paperrr

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Philo then begins to tell us about the four types of evil in the world that we live in. With each evil Philo explains to us why each one was not needed to be created by god. The first evil is the existence of physical pain. The reason why pain is present is for us to realize that we shouldn’t do something that causes pain or to help us avoid certain situations. Philo suggests that instead of feeling pain why not just have decreases in pleasure when we do something that we shouldn’t. He uses an example of “All animals might be constantly in a state of enjoyment; but when urged by any of the necessities of nature…….;instead of pain they might feel a diminution of pleasure” (Hume,pg87). The second is the fact that the world is conducted by general laws. Philo states that instead of God should be able to run the world however he likes and that he should be able to decide what happens with everything. With this being true, god would be able to stop people from getting hit by a car or stop people from getting shot by a gun. He would be able to change physics whenever he pleased. The third example of evil is the limited abilities that we are given. Philo explains how god only granted us with the…

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of evil refers to the nature of God. Many assume that God is benevolent but hardly anyone really considers the possibility that God is not all good but rather an all evil, malevolent God. The question is if God is all good and all powerful, then why did he create a world full of evil and suffering? There is so much suffering in this world that a lot of people find it hard to believe that, if God does exist, he is good. There is the argument that an all good, all powerful God would create some suffering in the world to perhaps allow people to achieve greater goods. However, in all honesty, there is more evil than good in the world and so the likely hood of that isn’t very high. So in order to explain the nature of the problem of evil, then one has to consider the possibility of an evil God as well as a benevolent one. Is God willing to prevent evil, but unable to? Is God able to prevent evil, but unwilling to do so? Or is God able to prevent evil and willing to?…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although I disagree with his opinion, Hume exhibits a very sensible argument. David Hume explains four essential circumstances. First of which, Hume believes that God should dispose of all pain. Because both pain and pleasure stimulate humans equally, why should we be able to experience pain? For example, as regular humans we experience feelings such as thirst and hunger, instead of being able to feel the pain of it, we should just be feeling a lack of pleasure. Why is it necessary to feel pain when I simply want to eat or drink something? Secondly, God should eliminate all general laws of nature. For example, if a car crash is about to happen, God should interfere and insure that no person will come to death or extreme injury/pain. Next, God should not dispense talents and abilities unevenly between each of his creations. “God” created animals that obtain optimal strength, ability to fly, and run incredible speeds, while humans are left with minimal physical strengths. God also created people that are talented in sports, making life easier to stay in shape and a possible career by pursuing these particular talents, while there are others who have no special talent and are forced to take extra measures in order to gain fitness and a future career. God should have given equality to all of his creations. Finally, Nature seems to have defects that allow us to see that sometimes…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is hard to find a meaningful role for human life if God is seen as omnipotent. Whereas obedience is emphasized, any responsibility that humans have to change the conditions of the world is diminished. If he is seen as all powerful, all knowing, and all loving then he would know everything that happens before it does and because he is all loving, he is the only one who could change the bad conditions in the world. In saying we cannot change anything; we have no point of living, except to obey God.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Theodicy Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To order to answer the question ‘How can a God so all knowing and all powerful could allow suffering upon innocent people?” we must first analyze the problem of evil which is caused by humans and their freedom of choice with a past and future justification (Gottlieb). The Jewish believed they solved the problem of evil question by listing twelve explanations for suffering (Gottlieb). In past justification there is five explanations, the first one is someone can be nice to the outside world but evil behind closed doors (Gottlieb). For example a Jewish husband abuses his wife in private but he is friendly and nice to all his neighbors which is a perfect illustration because if something happens to cause the man to suffer it was as a result of his evil behavior towards his wife (Gottlieb). The second explanation is judgement because the suffer failed to help humanity and fulfil his human…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The God of Small Things

    • 12518 Words
    • 51 Pages

    The scene opens on the town of Ayemenem in the southern Indian province of Kerala. The setting is almost unbearably abundant and full of life. We encounter Rahel, who returns home to Ayemenem to see her twin brother, Estha. Still living in the same house is her grandaunt, Baby Kochamma. Rahel and Estha have a peculiar relationship. As children they considered themselves to be one person. Roy tells us that "they were a rare breed of Siamese twins, physically separate, but with joint identities." Rahel used to share experiences, dreams, and memories with Estha. But as 31-year-old adults, the twins have become individual emotionally as well as physically. As young children they lived in the famous tea province of Assam. Later on, their parents divorced and Ammu returned to live in Ayemenem.…

    • 12518 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Powerful Essays