Preview

What Is Human Error In Sophie's World By Rene Descartes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
599 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Human Error In Sophie's World By Rene Descartes
A universal characteristic among humans is the need to make errors. Humans are born to make mistakes, it is how we learn. René Descartes was a philosopher who studied the art of free will. Within this topic, human error was something that impacted and interested him. As humans, we are imperfect. The only perfect being in the universe is God, as Descartes said. Ohio State undergraduate student, Thomas Reid, is a philosophy student. Reid analyzes Descartes and writes his interpretation of Descartes’ human error; “Descartes believes that human error arises because the scope of the will is wider than that of the intellect: the will is infinite, but the intellect is finite” (Reid). Descartes is saying that as long as there are humans, mistakes will be made. A quote from Descartes stuck out to Reid and peaked his learning interests. The quote was “As intermediates between God and nothingness, human error does not have to come from God: it is merely a defect that comes from being an imperfect being." Reid wanted to know what the late …show more content…
However, Spinoza went deeper into to free will. In Sophie’s World by Jostein Gaarder, the narrator teaches Sophie about the world around her and what philosophy and literature do for the human condition.
You may have the right to move your thumb any way you choose. But your thumb can only move according to its nature. It cannot jump off your hand and dance about the room. In the same way you also have your place in the structure of existence, my dear. You are Sophie, but you are also a finger of God’s body. (Gaarder 249)
Gaarder is saying everyone has free will, but that free will is limited to what the human body is capable of. Another way to look at it is the choices you make. Everyone has the right to make choices, but the consequences that follow will limit your choices. This is exactly what Spinoza wants us to understand and take into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his article, "The Case against Free Will" James Rachels investigates the idea of choice and what makes through and through freedom a vital idea. Rachels additionally contends that just individual and God have unrestrained choice, yet God's ability with the expectation of complimentary will is still under inquiries. There are several main point Rachel mention in this article. Rachels says Darrow’s resistance that individuals that never in charge of their activities, in light of the fact that their activities are brought on by strengths past their control.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a controversy between whether or not a person has free will. He states that a determinist,…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes thinks that since we all have an innate idea of a perfect being, then that perfect being, which he calls God, has to exist, or else it would not be perfect anymore. There are two problems with this line of thought. First, do we really have an innate idea of a perfect being? Wouldn’t we need to acquire the concept of “perfect” and “being” first? It is true that we could not have directly seen or experienced a perfect being in real life, but that does not mean the idea of a perfect being has to be innate. Rather, we can form this idea merely by experiencing non-perfect beings and imagining the opposite, just like how we develop the idea of immaterial things after we have seen or experienced material things. Therefore, the idea of a perfect being is not innate, and in fact, it is possible for us never to have that idea at all. On the other hand, why must a perfect being exist? Why should existence be better, “more perfect,” than non-existence? Descartes does not give us enough evidence of the “perfectness” of existence, and thus existence cannot be guaranteed as an essential part of the perfect being’s property. Now I have shown that Descartes’ main argument for God’s existence is flawed, although I still do not rule out the possibility of God’s…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Are We?

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this section ‘I think, therefore I am’ Alsford looks into human beings as subjects and refers to the philosophy of Rene Descartes concerning human nature. Descartes theorized that if he thought that something is false and he is the one thinking it, he states: “I think, therefore I am.” Descartes philosophy continues to dominate Western thought and culture even to this day.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His argument is founded on the idea that every human being is a rational agent who is self-aware, has free will and cannot be treated as a mere thing. He also describes a human being as self-owners. Self-ownership is the claim that individuals own themselves, their bodies, ability, talents and any products of their labor. They have all the authority over themselves. Because individuals are self-owners, they have certain rights to their lives, liberty as well as the products of their labor. Owning something is having the right to possess it and dispose of it and thus to own oneself is to have the rights over various elements that make up one’s life. These rights function as limitations on the actions of others by setting limits on how others…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ (39). The source of his errors is rooted into the last sentences of this essential paragraph. He argues, “ since the will extends further than the intellect, I do not contain the will within the same boundaries: rather, I also extend to things I do not understand. Because the will is indifferent in regards to such matters, it easily turns away from the true good; and in this way I am deceived and I sin” (39) He doesn’t only apply his ability to exercise free will on matters he understands, but also on matters that he does not understand. His ability to think leads him to think. argue and question many ideas. In some of these cases an opportunity may arise when has to choose a side of the matter. The free will he posses do not tell him the correct side to choose. He rationalizes it into his on his own understanding and then he chooses a side. This can lead him to make an error and be imperfect because the side he might have chosen could be the wrong choice. God gave him the ability to think and choose but God does not tell him the correct choice and this can lead him to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, he seems to be arguing that too much freedom is too possible; “How much more then should free thought be granted, seeing that it is in itself a virtue and that it cannot be crushed”. Seeing injustice as irrelevant and that it is unnecessary to grant too much freedom, is in itself to put restrictions on liberty. Spinoza debates for absolute freedom, yet seems to ignore cases when this is not granted. Spinoza is planting a seed to foundations of more neoliberal ideas of freedom, as he is promoting individual freedom rather than more socialist and collective freedoms. He talks about the “happiness of living in a republic, where everyone is judgement is free..” using Holland and Amsterdam as example. He falls into a trap of positive liberty which resembles the “American dream” that equality is already accomplished rather something that needs to constantly be worked…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frankfurt, H. G. (1971, January 14). Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. The Journal of Philosophy, 5-20.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes, a French philosopher attempted to craft groundwork to establish further scientific developments. He rationed that once one knows the foundations of a belief and one builds upon that, much of what one believes can be doubted. He held that through using math’s methods, he could apply these same methodologies to other ideas. Descartes believed that nothing can be perceived more easily and evidently than his own mind. By applying his theory, that he knew nothing for certain but was aware of his own thought, he started to combat already instituted ideas and conjured up the existence of…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free will is a concept of much debate. I base my conception of free will on Erasmus's definition. Erasmus argues that free will is “The human will by which man is able to direct himself towards to turn away from what leads to eternal salvation”(6). My conception of free will alters the last clause and instead substitutes, man’s ability to direct himself towards and turn away from success, in addition to having the freedom to define such success. In this paper I will argue that man’s will is never completely free; it is always dependent to some extent on God. I will analyze the philosophical theories of Erasmus, Luther, Descartes, Spinoza, and the movie The Adjustment Bureau, and the arguments they they make in their…

    • 2353 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cartesian Circle

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As is usually the case when someone makes a bold and illogical statement, many have challenged Descartes’ logic. Many have claimed that his argument follows a “vicious circle,” as both premises rely on each other’s truth and validity. His argument is basically dependent on certainty of God’s existence, despite an equal amount of uncertainty regarding that existence. Descartes states that no one is definite about the existence of God, nor can they know anything clearly and distinctly until they are certain about the existence of God. Assuming that these premises are accurate, we as humans know nothing because we cannot say with certainty that God exists.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sophies World

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the most basic philosophical questions, as well as at the same time being the most complicated, in the novel Sophie’s World is the question, who are we? This question alone is what embarks Sophie, the main character in the novel, on a never ending journey of questions and through the world of philosophy. As it is shown in Sophie’s World, the concepts of philosophy have been in constant change all throughout history, philosophers contradicting one another in a constant battle to achieve greatness, and proceeding in a constant never ending cycle of philosopher contradicting philosopher. Because of this non-stop constant change in philosophy, Democritus, one of the earliest philosophers, would have a completely different opinion on the question of who we are? Than that of the Greek philosopher Plato, or of a philosopher like Descartes. Although the question itself might not really seem all that complicated, philosophically speaking it is a bottomless pit of never-ending questions.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sophie's World Reaction

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Jostein Gaarder’s, Sophie’s World, Ms. Gaarder is able to effectively combine two stories within a story to help us find the true meaning of our lives by studying the history of philosophy. I noticed that although the story is written as a textbook of philosophy, it really is a guide on how we as humans should approach our own lives. I was wondering throughout the book who was the main focus of the story. Was it Sophie or Hilde? But once I neared the end of the book, I realized that the book’s main character is a combination of the both, because Sophie and Hilde represent a direct translation to how we should react to philosophy and use it in our own lives, making us the real focus of the book. Gaarder uses so many symbols to convey the ideal philosopher and learner. We find out that Albert is the model for Alberto, and that Hilde is the model of Sophie. This reminded me of the many children stories that my mom used to read me as a kid that had the parent in the book reading a story to their kid about another set of parent and kid. When the book started, I was unsure of what to think. But once I had reached the middle of the story, the plot was revealed. Then, Gaarder throws the reader for another loop when the knowledge of Albert writing the book is thrown in, along with all the fictional characters. But in the end, I realized the confusing plot was all part of Gaarder’s plan to symbol the chaotic and stressful ordeals that we all have to go through in life. The point of Sophie’s World is to help us to question our own lives, and to help guide us through our own lives. I thought the book treated my intellectual side very well because of all the things I learned when the book described the philosophers. I have never considered myself a fully religious person, and when learning about all the…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sophie's World

    • 3465 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Sophie 's World is both a novel and a lecture of the history of philosophy therefore the theme of the novel is Philosophy. The main character of the novel is Sophie and Alberto. They represent us, people, who needs philosophy to understand our world. Gaardner stresses that to be a philosopher we must never stop asking questions. It does not matter that there may be no answer to the question we ask. Because asking itself makes human. If we live without asking questions of philosophizing, then we just missed the greatest pleasure and understanding that we could ever have. Although it is not easy to seek easy answers about our question but atleast we have thought of an idea that in the future it could change the history and the belief of the present time. Gaarder shows us that even when philosophy is complicated, it revolves around simplicity. It is only difficulty in the start but if we could seek an answer of our questions, it may make our lives easier.…

    • 3465 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays