Preview

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Apex Predators

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2144 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Apex Predators
Pros and Cons of owning an apex predator

Before I can discuss the arguments of each side of this debate I must describe what it means to be an apex predator. An apex predator is an animal that has no natural predators and are usually at the top of the food chain. This description covers a wide variety of animals ranging from lions, tigers, and bears to other exotic creatures. There have been many arguments from both sides on how to handle these animals. Many people see these animals as “cute” and “cuddly” when they are young, but once they start growing they become more difficult to manage and can become dangerous. In some cases these animals are able to be released back into their natural habitat or put in captivity without any
…show more content…
Before the release of gray wolves in 1995/1996 there was a 70 year gap where wolves were extirpated form the park. This created a top down trophic cascade which changed the ecosystem in the park. Without the wolves the elk population grew affecting the plant life in the park. With the growing elk population this meant there was less plants to feed on which resulted in many plant species numbers being greatly diminished. On top of this, other animals also migrated out of the area because of the imposing elk populations. Once the wolves were introduced back into the park there was a shift. Even though many of the elk were not killed it changed their behavior patterns. They left the valleys and moved to places where they could easily avoid the wolves. After the migration of the elk the plant life completely changed, many of the plants were able to thrive. Once the plants regrew another shift happened. Many of the other animals that moved from the park started to return. Migratory birds returned, with the growth of the trees beavers returned as well. In return to the beavers returning, they created habitats for other animals to thrive such as, fish, reptiles, and amphibians. With these animals populations growing other animals thrived too. Birds and bears were able to feed on the fish and the bears were able to feed off the berries from the vegetation that …show more content…
Whether you agree with it or not, one thing that is beneficial to have them is for educating purposes. Having people come in contact with these animals helps them understand the roles these animals play in the world and what they can do to help save them. Places like the Saint Louis Zoo use some of these animals to educate the public and in return the public funds from donations and admission. In 2004 the Saint Louis Zoo created the WildCare Institute. It was created to work in conservation of local and foreign wildlife dealing with wildlife management and recovery, conservation science, and support of the human population that coexist with wildlife. The Saint Louis Zoo has also been connecting people to animals through educational programs. The zoo offers classes, lectures, camps, teacher workshops, distance learning, zoo tours, overnights and outreach programs that are either taught by zoo keepers, volunteers, or through special exhibits. One of the biggest ways the zoo educates the public is by letting people observe the animals. In doing research they found that people make an emotional connection with the animals that in return leads the people to learn more about the wildlife and act differently towards

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It has lots of elk and deer and black bears in the mountains and on the forest side. There are over 260 maintained trails so that means you will see the animals - foxes, raccoons and other animals. The animals have to blend in and survive on their…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, we have seen the ecosystem flourish due to a successful reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park. We have seen a steady decrease in elk population, which in turn helped create a successful trophic cascade. Looking at graphs we can see that the wolf reintroduction has done its job, and we see a more than 50% decrease in population of elk. But what could happen if the wolf population doubled. We could see a total extermination of elk from Yellowstone and a decrease in visitors to Yellowstone, but in turn we could see in increase in the population of wolves, water animals, birds, and bears.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scared To Death Summary

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ed Yong's article, "Scared to Death", describes how returning wolves to Yellowstone affected the elk population's patterns and behaviors. Many people believe that the fear of being eaten is what drives animals away. However, this theory is not completely true. The Yellowstone elk population was thriving, but the wolves' return impacted it on many different levels.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wolves mainly focused on the sick and older elks, the younger and stronger elks didn’t have much to worry about. Although elks are preys for wolves, they can be hard to find if they are in adulthood and they aren’t much bigger than wolves in stature. So, what caused the major changes at Yellowstone? According to Middleton, after Wolves were exterminated by humans, elks took over and exploded in terms of population size, they consumed most of the willow shrubs, which was what beavers consumed. Without this vital food source, the beaver population declined. Since there were no beavers, there were no dams which, caused flooding to occur. There’s a lot of evidence that shows that grizzly bears begin to feast on elk calves as a result of the decrease in cutthroat…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example of this is when the wolves were taken out of Yellowstone Park, when this happened the park became deprived of plants. When they were put in the plants became grown and diverse. This happened because the wolves changed the behaviors of its prey and this make it so that the plants were able to grow back. This was all created by keystone species. Overall keystone species have the biggest impact on the high…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trophic Cascade Essay

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the wolves were reintroduced it began to restore the trophic cascade. The reduced browsing because of the altered behavior allowed increase in the recruitment of woody plants like Aspen (Populus tremuloides) and willow (Salix spp.) (Ripple and Beschta 2012). Without the elk decimating woody plants populations they were able to regenerate. This resulted in an increase in multiple species native to the park. These species included bison (Bison bison), beaver (Castor canadensis), and bears (Ursus arctos). The relative abundance and richness of 6/7 species of songbirds also increased because of the increased recruitment (Ripple and Beschta 2012). The wolves also have a positive effect on the age/sex structure. By concentrating on calves and older females they consistently eliminate the older sicker elk that are less suitable to survive. The wolves rarely prey on females in their reproductive prime or full grown males. The reintroduction has also had a positive effect on the bison population. The elk and bison share 80% of the same browsing food source. As elk are driven from their preferred browsing areas the bison are able to exploit the areas with the most nutritional…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whales in Captivty

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I can’t argue with the fact that “Zoos and aquariums provide access and a vital connection to the world of wildlife and our environment …” (Nightingale) and supposedly that they help to “foster an understanding of nature and how it works ...” (Nightingale) Sure, they show us what an animal looks like, and what they’re capable of doing, for example, training them to do tricks, and then rewarding them with food.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some argue that zoos are fundamental to the education of their children. Additionally, some believe zoos allow children to bond with the animals. However, since animals are trapped in smaller environments, they act differently than they do in the wild. Therefore, there is no real educational value in observing these trapped animals. Animals in confinement do not hunt, play, or act as they do in their natural habitat, hence children are learning false behaviors of animals. Zoo advocates also espouse the belief that zoos are instrumental in protecting endangered species. Nevertheless, only seventeen percent of the species in zoos are endangered (“Zoo Statistics”). Many of the endangered species in zoos are stolen from the wilderness and the chances of being released back are nearly impossible because zoos need them for money (Russo). Furthermore, zoos do not release endangered animals because their ability to survive in the wild has greatly diminished as a result of time spent in captivity (Russo). The best way to preserve animals in danger of extinction is to protect them in their natural habitats, not imprison them in…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years since the wolf reintroduction, Yellowstone has become a premiere scientific laboratory for wilderness observation and ecosystem recovery. Scientists have come from around the world to watch the effect wild wolves have on the park. We have discovered that an ecological effect called the “trophic cascade” has taken over Yellowstone, with the wolves initiating a more natural ecosystem balance than has been seen in over sixty-five years.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In addition to eliminating weak members of elk herds, hence strengthening the heard as a whole, wolves keep herds on the move and maintain the balance of the herd in reform to the fragile wilderness. In moving the herd frequently, wolves preserve groves of aspens and other smooth-barked trees, improving the stability of the ground and preventing damaging erosion, especially near river and stream banks essential for the survival of fish, beavers, and even aquatic-oriented birds. An imbalance in the wolf population has repercussions on the entire ecosystem, ranging from the more easily seen populations of elk to the more blurred effects on fish and expanding even further to animals who depend on fish, ultimately affecting even markets in our economy. This “trophic cascade,” named by biologists and ecologists, have a wide array of repercussions which can occasionally be irreversible. Entire populations can easily be wiped clear from existence, giving way to a devastating mudslide of devastation and a whole new era of demanding complications. In a field study, Ecologist William Ripple and his Oregon State University colleague Robert Beschta reported that “within three years after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park elk populations fell, pockets of trees and shrubs began rebounding. Beavers returned, coyote numbers dropped and habitat flourished for fish and birds.” And yet, people…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actually, those species are vital in the Yellowstone environment. For instance, Gray wolves were reintroduced after being extinct in Yellowstone in the 1900s as farmers complained about the damage Gray wolves did to their livestock. After removal of wolves, Yellowstone elk began to overpopulate due to a lack of their natural enemies, causing vegetation to vanish there, affecting animals like rabbits, mice, and much more, which depend on that vegetation. Decreased number of those herbivore endangered carnivore, such as coyotes and foxes, as well. Just a removal of wolves by humans has brought the ecosystem out of balance. However, the bright side is that, since reintroduction of Gray wolves in 1995, the ecosystem in Yellowstone National Park is showing some recovery, telling us that it may not be too late and humans may be able to correct what they have done against the Mother Nature. The history of Yellowstone National Park tells us that we humans can easily destroy the ecosystem but a recovery effort is possible and worth to…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolf Reintroduction

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over time Yellowstone National Park have undergone factors that have destroyed their wolf population. With this decline, or as others say habitual extinction, individuals began to understand the importance that these animals (1) had on a working ecosystem. In 1975 the wolf reintroduction process to Yellowstone began, however, it is still going on today due to it being such an extensive course of action.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature sometimes can be unpredictable at times which leads to a porous way of regulating animal populations. It is up to mankind positioning themselves to take charge in any way possible. In this case, it leads to hunting which has it many benefits, either for food or sport: it brings the togetherness of families, it allows for friendship among fellow hunters and keeping the spread of diseases to a minimum while controlling the animal population.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wolf is a meat eater and successful hunter. With fairy tales like Little Red Riding Hood the wolf is thought of with fear and with the loss of livestock many ranchers hate them. Problems with wolves go a long ways back in history. “In 1914, Congress approved funding to eliminate the native gray wolves from Yellowstone, fearing that elk and moose populations might be wiped out. After years of debate, 41 Canadian gray wolves were released in Yellowstone between 1995 and 1997. Yellowstone wolves have admirers that follow them online and scientist have seen positive changes in the ecosystem of…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Predator-Prey Interaction

    • 3361 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Predators are animals that kill for their food; they must do this in order to survive. There has been controversy about predation in some areas including the re-introduction of wolves into the Yellowstone National park area and other areas. Predator-prey relationships are both beneficial and detrimental to some species. The weakest and unhealthiest become dinner for those predators and also become a positive thing for the species that only the strongest of the herd will survive and continue to reproduce. Some types of prey have defense mechanisms which fight off predators. Survival of the fittest is the best explained phrase for this type of ecological interaction.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays