Preview

Wealth Transfers Among And Between Bond

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wealth Transfers Among And Between Bond
Wealth Transfers among and between Bond Issues in Mergers and
Acquisitions: Evidence from Bond Tender Offers

Matthew T. Billett* and Ke Yang **

March 2011

Abstract: We explore the wealth effects of mergers and acquisitions to bondholders at the bond issue level using a sample of mergers and acquisitions that involve a tender offer for one or more of the target or acquiring firms’ bond issues. Over the period 2000-2008 such tender offers occur in 32% of the mergers and acquisitions involving targets and acquirers with outstanding rated bonds. We find these tender offers influence not only the associated bond’s wealth, but also the wealth of shareholders and sibling and other bond issues that remain outstanding.

We thank Paul Hribar, Erik Lie, Jay Sa-Aadu, Anand M. Vijh, seminar participants at Lehigh
University, the University of Iowa, the University of Texas at El Paso, and the University of
Wyoming for helpful comments. All errors are our own.

*

Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa. Email: matt-billett@uiowa.edu
College of Business and Economics, Lehigh University. Email: key208@lehigh.edu.

**

1

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are one of the most value relevant actions a firm can undertake. Numerous studies document that the wealth effect to a particular class of securities depends on the overall synergistic gain, the relative bargaining power of the target and acquirer, and on wealth transfers between shareholders and debtholders. Bradley, Desai and Kim (1988) report that merger announcements result in a 7.43% increase in the combined value of target and acquirer shares. However these gains are far from evenly split. Target shareholder wealth increases by 31.77% while acquirer shareholders gain little or even lose value depending on the time period examined. Prior studies document mixed evidence on the wealth effects for target and acquirer bondholders. Kim and McConnell (1997), Asquith and Kim (1982), Dennis and
McConnell (1986) and



References: Asquith, Paul, and E. Han Kim, 1982, The impact of merger bids on the participating firms’ security holders, Journal of Finance 37, 1209-1228. Billett, Matthew T., 1996, Targeting capital structure: the relationship between risky debt and the firm’s likelihood of being acquired, The Journal of Business 69, 173-192 Billett, Matthew T., Tao-Hsien Dolly King and David C. Mauer, 2004, Bondholder wealth effects in mergers and acquisitions: New evidence from the 1980s and 1990s, The Journal of Finance 59, 107-134 Billett, Matthew T., Zhan Jiang and Erik Lie, 2010, The effect of change-in-control covenants on Cook, Douglas O. and John C. Easterwood, 1994, Poison put bonds: An analysis of their economic role, The Journal of Finance 49, 1905-1920 Cook, Douglas O. and John D. Martin, 1991, The co-insurance and leverage effects of target firm bondholder wealth, Research in Finance 9, 107-129 Crabbe, Leland, 1991, Event risk: An analysis of losses to bondholders and “super poison put” bond covenants, The Journal of Finance 46, 689-706 Dennis, Debra K., and John J. McConnell, 1986, Corporate mergers and security returns, Journal of Financial Economics 16, 143-187. Eger, Carol E., 1983, An empirical test of the redistribution effect in pure exchange mergers, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 4, 547-572. Ghosh, Aloke and Prem C. Jain, 2000, Financial leverage changes associated with corporate mergers, Journal of Corporate Finance 6, 377-402 Higgins, Robert C., and Lawrence D. Schall, 1975, Corporate bankruptcy and conglomerate mergers, The Journal of Finance 30, 93-111 Israel, Ronen, 1991, Capital structure and the market for corporate control: The defensive role of debt financing, The Journal of Finance 46, 1391-1409 Kahan, Marcel and Bruce Tuckman, 1993, Do bondholders lose from junk bond covenant changes? The Journal of Business 66, 499-516 Kim, Han E., and John J. McConnell, 1977, Corporate mergers and the co-insurance of corporate debt, Journal of Finance 32, 349-365. Lewellen, Wilbur G., 1971, A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger, The Journal of Finance 26, 521-537 Mann, Steven V. and Eric A. Powers, 2007, Determinants of bond tender premiums and the percentage tendered, Journal of Banking & Finance 31, 547-566 Maquieira, Carlos P., William L. Megginson, and Lance A. Nail, 1998, Wealth creation versus wealth redistributions in pure stock-for-stock mergers, Journal of Financial Economics Rauh, Joshua D., and Amir Sufi, 2010, Capital structure and debt structure, Review of Financial Studies, 23, 4242-4280. Shastri, Kuldeep, 1990, The differential effects of mergers on corporate security values, Research in Finance 8, 179-201. Warga, Arthur, and Ivo Welch, 1993, Bondholder losses in leveraged buyouts, Review of Financial Studies 6, 959-982. Wingler, Tony R., and G. Donald Jud, 1990, Premium debt tenders: Analysis and evidence, Financial Management, 58-57.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ravenscraft, David J. & Scherer, F.M. (1987), Mergers, Sell-offs and Economic Efficiency. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Lubatkin, M. (1983), ``Mergers and the performance of the acquiring firm ' ', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 218-25. Retrieved 2012-02-03…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dominant value creating function is the main reason for the firm engagement in inorganic growth. Through this mode of growth, the firm improved the value of shareholders since the power and efficiency of the merged companies are better than the individual companies working separately. As a result, the value was captured in the anticipated synergies where the results of these mergers were evident based on the accelerated growth in revenues, profits, and assets. In addition, the mergers, especially the merger between world com and MCI, brought together two firms that have complementary strengths and assets (Hitt & Harrison, 2001). Through these mergers, the shareholders’ value was improved through operational cost reduction including, the reduction in reduced leased lined costs, and elimination of expensive terminal charges both locally and internationally. Also, the mergers eliminated duplication of activities and investments, adoption of best practices while sales and marketing forces have meshed thus making the established market channel to be better established. Moreover, the mergers and acquisitions helped the firm minimize the competition in the market, instantly add new brands to the firm’s product portfolio, instant access to fresh customer base and expansion to new geographical locations, gaining economies of scale over a reduced period of time, injection of new and diversified management skills and significant reduction of time to market thus giving the firm the competitive advantage (Gaughan, 2013). All these merger outcomes are value-adding since they enable merger process meet the characteristic of the value adding…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Where will the value for the acquisition premium of 50% come from in the proposed buyout?…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fvc Case Summary

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    By calculating the difference between the stand-alone value and the with-merger value, we found that the value of control (i.e: premium for control) is $…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the maximum price that Cooper can afford to pay for Nicholson and still keep the acquisition attractive from the standpoint of Cooper?…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The name of the merger my group and I are assessing is the Comcast and Time Warner Cable Merger. There are three firms involved in the Comcast and Time Warner Cable Merger (Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Charter Communications). The first firm is Comcast. Comcast is a public, NASDAQ, headquarters company type. The annual sales for Comcast in 2013 was $64.66 billion and a one year sales growth of 3.34% (Hoovers). Some of the extents of Comcast operation is that Comcast shareholders accounts for 33% of the shareholders vote (Fernandez, Bob). Comcast will issue out $806 million shares for Time Warner Cable to be swapped at a ratio of 2.875 Comcast shares for one Time Warner Cable share (Fernandez, Bob).…

    • 1970 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    4. "Bonds 200." Why Companies Issue Callable Bonds. N.p., 24 Sept. 2014. Web. 30 Sept. 2014. 4.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Delta Airlines Culture

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Freifeld, L Source: Training: Mar/Apr, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p38-40 3p Article Subject Terms: CONSOLIDATION & merger of corporations…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dividends from Hybrid$38,400,000$12,800,000$29,400,000$41,400,000$59,000,000Terminal value of equity600,000,000Total$38,400,000$12,800,000$29,400,000$41,400,000$659,000,000To discount the cash flows from the merger, we must discount each cash flow at the appropriatediscount rate. The terminal value of the company is subject to normal business risk and should bediscounted at the cost of capital, while the dividends are equity cash flows, and as such, should bediscounted at the cost of equity. The present value of each year’s cash flows, along with theappropriate discount rate for each cash flow is:…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Microsoft/Intuit

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • The short‐term stock price reaction to merger g y g is neutral or slightly negative. • Over a long period of time,…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scherer, F. M. (2006). A new retrospective on mergers. Review of Industrial Organization, 28, 327–341. doi:10.1007/s11151-006-9105-9…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: • BRUNER, R., F., 2004. Applied Mergers and Acquisitions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp.45-50.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Oliver Williamson has made important contribution to the field of economics of organizations. He developed a modern transaction cost economics and his research has been striving to explain why different types of relationships between firms occur. His early work described inefficiencies that arise in bilateral relationships, for example bargaining under asymmetric information (Williamson 1979). Later on he studied relationship-specific assets and hold-up situations. The concept of hold-up was developed by Klein, Crawford and Alchian in their paper Vertical Integration, Appropriable QuasiRents, and the Competitive Contracting Process from 1978. The idea of hold-up is that when one firm invests in a specific asset that another firm needs but that is of no use for the investing firm, the second firm has a strong bargaining position since the investing firm is depending on getting the investment into use and earning revenue from it. The second firm can therefore after the contract and the investment is made change the conditions of the contract and the investing firm are in no position to decline. There is thus, a risk of opportunism for the investing firm. Williamson (1985) showed that three transaction characteristics are critical for a firm: frequency, uncertainty, and asset specificity. Higher levels of frequency, uncertainty and degree of asset specificity will result in a more complex contracting situation for firms. Therefore a hierarchical relationship can be preferable since it will lower transaction cost, that is, the cost associated with an economic exchange. This can be done through a vertical integration of firms; there are two types of vertical integration backward vertical integration and forward vertical integration. The former is when a firm buys a company that produces inputs to the production of the firms final good and the latter is when a company acquires the distribution centers and retailers that…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Valuation analysis

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Notice that the equity value without a merger is: 35 + 10 = 45. So the…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics