Preview

Violations of Laissez Faire by the U.S federal government between 1865 and 1900

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violations of Laissez Faire by the U.S federal government between 1865 and 1900
The principle of laissez faire is that the an unobtrusive government is the best government; that the government necessarily only 'maintain domestic tranquillity, defend the people from invasion, and protect them when travelling.' To leave economic workings of the country to the people and let the 'motives for production' be that of the people not the government. Our government took such a stance in its early decades, but as national debt rose, interstate commerce became indomitable, and the economy lost its strength, the need to patch the economy became very important. The government found that the needed patch was much more important than the laissez faire freedom previously given to monopolistic trusts, who were loosing favor with the majority of the lower class, who shared on 50% of the nation's wealth. As an attempt to end all that ailed the country the government began limiting land grants, instituting interstate commerce laws, and passing anti-trust bills, like The Sherman Anti-Trust Bill.

As the railroads became larger and more powerful, the need to give away land to million dollar companies became ludicrous to many citizens, especially in light of the declining economy. These changing feelings among the people (voters) moved congress to decide that 'no subsidy in money, bonds, public lands, indorsement, or by pledges of public credit' should be given to the railroad or any other private company, when it could be spent on the common good of the public, or kept as capital in the Public Treasury. The idea that no land need be given to the companies anymore was also supported by the growing feeling of being cheated by the railway through rebates, and other discriminations between large and small business.

The decision to regulate interstate commerce grew mostly out of the rebate, and long-haul, short-haul discriminations of the railroads. The growing feeling that the business were running their businesses only to end in a monopoly is led the Congress to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The growth of railroads was very beneficial to industries across America, but analyzing this fact was not very helpful for the farmers. Although, the benefits bought to these companies were at the expense of farmers. These practices seriously hurt the farmers by raising their shipping rates in order to lower that of larger companies. The increase the rates of Railroad companies not only made farmers lose profits but it even caused many of those farmers bound by contract to fall into debt. Although these Railroad companies gained the business of larger companies they hurt the business of farmers, and thus the farmers’ complaints were valid. These brought as a consequence those farmers from the north and from the south stared think a similar though that initialized a Alliance against the principles or the government.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Railroads as Industries • The railroads received federal support in starting their businesses. In America the railroads set the standard for big business • Myth that the government involvement is always bad • Government gives land to RR cheaply or free. • Wide right of ways allow railroads to sell valuable land History ..... Chapter 1 7...... p. 2…

    • 1163 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    they worked for regulation, if not public ownership, of the railroads as was called for by…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the government would not intervene with most of the economics of this time then that meant that the big businesses had the power to do anything they wanted no matter who it hurt, which was mostly the lower working classes. In Samuel Gompers Forum, "Letter on Labor in industrial Society", he tried to explain how the industries did not care for the lower classes by stating that, "Year by year man's liberties are trampled under foot at the bidding of corporations and trusts, rights are invaded and law perverted." Samuel went on to say, "You [a federal judge] may not know that the labor movement as represented by the trades unions, stands for right, for justice, for liberty," which meant that as the lower classes tried to fight back against the big businesses the government pushed them down to make sure the upper classes had no problems. Knowing all of this, it raises the question on how much of a laissez - faire government was America at that time?…

    • 698 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his Inaugural Address, he stated that many ideas in which supported Teddy Roosevelt. One, Interstate commerce railroads was a large element to the country and market of the railroad business. He wanted them to be more secure and have the Industry be more productive. Taft, in (1910) created the Mann-Elkins Act which strengthened Interstate Commerce Commission, made the original long-short haul clause more effective, and created more government control on railroad businesses.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apush- Monopolies

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During this era, the government practiced laissez-faire, an ideology that called for minimal government regulation of economic affairs. The government did not interfere with these monopolies and their negative impact on the economy. The railroads were viewed as one of the largest monopolies during this time. The railroad corporations could lower wages, provide bad working conditions, and fire workers without justification. When the government did take action in these affairs, they usually favored the corrupt…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Congress letter by John Randolph in 1816 discussed how Congress should regulate commerce and not levy taxes. The taxes favored manufacturers, and they became wealthy, while the southern farmers were extremely poor because of these duties (Doc A.). Along with extreme taxing, came great expansion west because of the population growth. This would seem like a good thing, but only to some parts of the US; particularly the North. The “National Road” was the first improved road to be funded by the federal government. Therefore, the north received roads, canals, and federal aid. The East received protective tariffs, and the South received close to nothing. Slavery was still prominent in the south, and no government aid was provided. In a letter from Anna Hayes Johnson in Charleston, South Carolina, to her cousin in Raleigh, North Carolina, she discusses the slavery dispute in the North and South. Slavery was temporarily dealt with by the Missouri Compromise in 1820; but it was not until later that a permanent abolishment was made (Doc G.). Another instance of Sectionalism was the Panic of 1819. What caused this was the deflation in crop prices; especially cotton as Britain demanded drops and cheaper resources. Also, over speculation of the land made the western farmers unable to pay loans from the US banks. The Bank of the US had suddenly tightened their credits; which incorporated tougher loan requirements, and requirements for specie from state banks. Lastly, politically, sectionalism was very obvious. In maps of popular votes and electoral votes from 1820 and 1824, it was clear that by 1824, different states had begun to vote for different presidents (Doc I.). Eventually, the US was divided into different political parties; and thus, political emerged and changed the US forever. In summary, sectionalism had emerged and what seemed…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt Presidency

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roosevelt didn’t like the impact that trusts had on local small business. But at the same time he believed that large-scale production and industrial growth were necessary and beneficial to the economy and country and control was needed. Hence, he made a policy to differentiate and pick out the “good” and the “bad” trusts. Supporting the good ones and eradicating the bad. He went after the Northern Securities Company for a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. This company was made up big shots like such as Rockefeller and J. P. Morgan. The Supreme Court ordered the company to be disband. He also went after then the American Tobacco Company, New Haven Railroad, and Standard Oil. All made things for his successor –Mr. Taft-…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main driving factor of the reform movements that took place following the Market Revolution was the obscurity of republican values. Despite the positive influences the Market Revolution had on quality of life and transportation, many Americans feared the corruption of their individual liberties. They had proper reason to believe that this would be an occurrence caused by the unbalanced power that was established during the Market Revolution. One example of this unbalance was the increasing power of banks, more specifically addressed by Andrew Jackson…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton a Constitutional elite of the time, had the following to say, “Can a democratic assembly who annually revolve in the mass of the people be supposed steadily to pursue the public good? Nothing but a permanent body can check the imprudence of democracy.” With views similar to this one the founding fathers empowered the federal government the right to collect taxes, appropriate money and deny the states the right to impair obligation of contracts. When comparing the resources of the wealthy might have compared to an average citizen, these contracts tended to favor the rich. Two examples of these contracts extend from employer to employee and landlord to tenant. The federal government was given the power to protect the interest of the owners of such contract through laws and by force if necessary.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Commerce Clause was merely placed in our Constitution to ensure that states couldn’t establish laws or regulations that would hinder with trade and economic commerce, in result gave Congress the power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.” To me, the Commerce Clause was once legitimate in the sense that the economic activity was mainly trade based and to prevent the intense rivalry among states, Congress needed to have the power to control interstate commerce to render conflicts. When creating and establishing the Commerce Clause I believe it could have been thought through and furthermore written in a more distinct and detailed way to accommodate the issues we have had. Because it wasn’t stated, U.S. Supreme Court ruled Congress to control intrastate commerce as long as the commerce significantly affects commerce involving more than one state, resulting from Gibbons v. Ogden. Sometimes I wonder if it’s realistic to think Congress will get to the point of controlling every aspect of our life, until something like the Affordable Care Act comes into consideration and keeps me questioning, what will be next.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What should have been the role of the federal government in regulating the economy during the Gilded Age?…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jackson served to fight for the rights of the lower class when he vetoed the bill to recharter the bank because he believed that it only advantaged the upper class. This Bank War was supported by the Jacksonians as they felt that he was fighting the rich monopoly and supporting the underprivileged. The same went for the case of Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge. The interests of the common man were once again represented when the Charles River Bridge proprietors were rejected the right to a monopoly to have the only bridge spanning across the river. Free enterprise was to become an invaluable part of the American economy. The topic of political democracy continued to make a resurrection throughout Jackson’s presidency as well. As self-proclaimed guardians of the constitution, the Jacksonians’ effort did not go unnoticed. Their prevalence throughout the 1830’s was so well felt that even foreigners, like Harriet Martineau,…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Late Nineteenth Century

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the late 1800's, farmers believed that the railroad companies were strangling away their profits and the government was in favor of big business thus justifying their feelings of discontent.". The farmers had every right to be upset about their situation because the government saw a need for reform which alludes to the fact that problems existed, the railroads had a monopoly on shipping which raised costs and affected profit margins, the value of crops had deflated, and big business was hostile towards farmers.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the government did begin to pass policies to intervene, the wealthy found ways to get around them or use them to their own advantage. The Sherman Antitrust Act was passed in 1890 to prevent illegal trusts from being developed to “eliminate competition or restrain free trade” was largely ignored by the federal government who ignored most trusts (Keene p…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays