Preview

Use of Scientific Management in the 21st Century

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1202 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Use of Scientific Management in the 21st Century
Use of Scientific Management in the 21st Century
Roberta Larkins
Jones International University
April 14, 2010

Abstract

The 19th and 20th Century gives the foundation of the shift in management modeling. Frederick Taylor, Henry Gantt, and Lillian Gilbreth gave great insight into the need for a paradigm shift in business. The elements of this shift form the basis of the four principles of Scientific Management. The principles of Scientific Management and their use in the 21st Century are the elements of this paper.

Use of Scientific Management in the 21st Century

The management of an organization that has a structural system which clearly defines the functions of the departments, groups, and individuals can be defined by the term Scientific Management originated by Frederick Taylor. (Nelson, 2003, p.1) The Encyclopedia for Business (n.d.) defines Scientific Management as “methods aimed at determining the best way for a job to be done. (n.d., pg 6). While the initial use of Scientific Management in dealing with issues of efficiency and productivity is rooted in the history of management theory during the 19th Century and early in the 20th Century, the same organizational needs are evident in business today and the usage of the fundamentals of Scientific Management can be used to effectively increase both efficiency and productivity in a 21st Century organization.

The Pioneers

Frederick Taylor, known as ‘the most influential business guru of the 20th century’ (154), began his journey into business in an apprenticeship to a patternmaker for a pump manufacturing company in Philadelphia.(Wren, 2004, 121) It is here Taylor has the opportunity to see firsthand what the employees are experiencing and make note of the elements of discourse. Wren describes the conditions as "worker restriction of output, poor management, and lack of harmony between labor and management" (2004, p.122). As Taylor continued to advance in his career, he stood



References: Darmody, P. (2007). Henry L. Gantt and Frederick Taylor: The Pioneers of Scientific Management. AACE International Transactions, 15.1-15.3. Retrieved from Business Source Premier Database. Hodgetts, R., & Greenwood, R. (1995). Frederick Taylor: Alive and Well and Ready for the 21st Century. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 218-222. Retrieved from Business Source Premier Database. Nelson, D., (2003, Jan) Scientific Management, Dictionary of American History, Retrieved from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-3401803768.html Pioneers of Management. (n.d.). In Encyclopedia of Business (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Or-Pr/Pioneers-of-management.html Wren, D., (2009) the evolution of management thought (6th Ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Ryan (2008) stated management is a set of activities (planning, and decision making, organizing, leading and controlling) directed at an organization’s resources, with the aim of achieving organizational goals efficiently and effectively.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wren, D.A. (2011). The Centennial of Frederick W. Taylor 's The Principles of Scientific Management: A Retrospective Commentary. Journal of Business & Management, 17, 11 – 22.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Maqbool, Mugheera., Zakariya, Ahmad., & Paracha Naveed, Ahmer. (2011). A critique on Scientific Management. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(4), 846.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firstly, big companies are often divided into several departments to focus on specialization, since the change in structure “allows them to divide the tasks of the whole organization into manageable sub-tasks and allocates them to organisational units that are responsible for their completion” (Rollinson, 2005: 461). However, when the organization’s structure does not include specialized jobs concerned with analysing the environment, the companies usually fail to adapt to changing circumstances (ibid: 463). So, scientific management works better with small companies which do not usually need to react to change (Caldari, 2007: 74). This lack of flexibility, the main defect attributed to the Fordism model (which adopted Taylorism’s Principles with just a different philosophy during 1960-1970) was the key word for the development of Post-Fordism (Caldari, 2007: 72).…

    • 2320 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If Scientific Management is as outdated and inhuman as many organizational theorists believe, why is it so prevalent in contemporary organizations?…

    • 3192 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What are the main features of Taylor’s approach to ‘Scientific Management” and what criticisms have been made of it? Do firms use scientific management today?…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The principle object of management should be to secure maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for the employee…” (Taylor, 1911, p.9)…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Scientific management also known as Taylorism (Mitchan 2005) is a set of rules that govern job design in manufacturing department. Taylor(1911), the pioneer of scientific management first came up with the theory in the late nineteenth century after viewing widespread inefficient work or soldiering among workers. Taylor’s promotion of time and motion study, production-control methods and incentive pay” (Burrell and Morgan 1979,Littler 1982 cited in Green 1986) has made great contributions to the boom of production since they were applied in practice. With the emergence of knowledge and information society which is science, technology and innovation intensified (Fagerberg, landstorm,Martin 2012 ),whether scientific management is still appropriate and effective in the modern society is uncertain. This article will explore suitability of scientific management in the new era. Firstly, principles of scientific management and influence of these principles in practical management will be reviewed followed by critiques of scientific management pointed out in the human relations movement. Then analysis of appropriateness and inappropriateness of scientific management in modern organizations will be illustrated in detail. Finally, conclusions will be made upon how to apply scientific management in the modern organization with modification of its demerits and giving full play to its merits to satisfy the demand of modern society.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Management approach was initially described and theorized by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. In his book “Principles of Scientific Management”, first published in 1911, Frederick Taylor formulated a view on management that was highly inspired by engineering principles. As such, the studies of Frederick Taylor can be seen as a culmination of a series of developments occurring in western industrialized countries, in which engineers took the lead in developing manufacturing productivity and in industrializing organizations. Frederick Taylor developed Scientific Management out of the belief that tasks could be optimized scientifically, and that Scientific Management could design the best rational way of performing any task, which would lead to enhanced productivity and profitability. Enhanced productivity would not only lead to greater profits for the employers, but also for the workers, who would be given the tools and training to perform at optimum performance.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) Scientific management: In Principles of Scientific Management (1911)Fredrick Winslow Taylor, the “Father” of scientific management utilises scientific methods to define the “one best way” for a job to be done…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Scientific Management was the product of 19th Century industrial practices and has no relevance to the present day. Discuss.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Daniel, N 1992, ‘Scientific Management in Retrospect’, in D Nelson (eds.), A Mental Revolution: Scientific Management since Taylor, Ohio State University Press, pp. 5-32, retrieved 20th March 2012, .…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Management approach was initially described and theorized by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. In his book “Principles of Scientific Management”, first published in 1911, Frederick Taylor formulated a view on management that was highly inspired by engineering principles.. Frederick Taylor developed Scientific Management out of the belief that tasks could be optimized scientifically, and that Scientific Management could design the best rational way of performing any task, which would lead to enhanced productivity and profitability. Enhanced productivity would not only lead to greater profits for the employers, but also for the workers, who would be given the tools and training to perform at optimum performance.(Wu, 2009) This theory was intended at studying the liaison between thephysical nature of the work and physiological nature of the workmen.It also stresses the importance of technical competency which will improve the organizations efficiency (Wu, 2009). Taylor’s four universal principles include: constructing a science for each element of the workers tasks; scientifically select, train, teach and develop the workers managers need to fully cooperate with the workers and the work shall be shared equally between managers and workers (Wu, 2009). According to Bell and Martin (2012), “it is important for managers to use Taylor’s scientific methods of determine the component tasks identified with a specific job and how long it takes to perform each component in order to know if the work load is balanced between all of the workers, or if the work needs to be reapportioned” ( p. 111).…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taylor started this paper by quoting then President of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt. Stating that "The conservation of our national resources is only preliminary to the larger question of national efficiency." Taylor pointed out that while a large movement had started to conserve material resources, the less visible and less tangible effects of the wasted human effort was only vaguely appreciated. He argues the necessity of focusing on training rather than finding the “right man,” stating “In the past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first,” and the first goal of all good systems should be developing first-class men. He listed three goals for the work:…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taylor’s Scientific Management theory illustrates that instead of using rule-of-thumb, managers should develop a science for each element of a man’s work. They scientifically select, train, teach and develop employees.( Frederick Winslow Taylor ,1911) Workers have to be fully cooperated “without asking questions or making suggestions”( Frederick Winslow Taylor ,1909,P87). However, in Mayo’s Human Relations Management workers and managers make decisions together and workers have certain degree of freedom of controlling their own job. Differences can also be seen in job design in two approaches, Taylor believes that work should be deskilled to the simplest parts that workers will do repetitive task, while Mayo’s principle is in the opposite way. He believes that it is important for workers to have various tasks in their work and also being able to see the finish products is motivational to workers. Furthermore, Taylorism claims that there is a scientific basis for incentive wage. (Fredrick W. Taylor, 1895) In contrast, Mayo states that work is a group activity. The communication between workers and management influences workers’ morale and productivity. The recognition, security and a sense of belonging also determine workers’ morale and productivity. ( Miller,D.,& Form,W.H,1964)…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays