Preview

Treaty of Lisbon

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Treaty of Lisbon
Treaty of Lisbon

The Treaty of Lisbon (initially known as the Reform Treaty) is an international agreement which amends the two treaties which form the constitutional basis of the European Union (EU). The Treaty of Lisbon was signed by the EU member states on 13 December 2007, and entered into force on 1 December 2009. It amends the Maastricht Treaty(1993), which also is known as the Treaty on European Union, and the Treaty of Rome (1952), which also is known as the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEEC). At Lisbon, the Treaty of Rome was renamed to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Prominent changes included the move from unanimity to qualified majority voting in at least 45 policy areas in theCouncil of Ministers, a change in calculating such a majority to a new double majority, a more powerful European Parliament forming a bicameral legislature alongside the Council of ministers under the ordinary legislative procedure, a consolidated legal personality for the EU and the creation of a long-term President of the European Council and a High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. The Treaty also made the Union's bill of rights, theCharter of Fundamental Rights, legally binding. The Treaty for the first time gave member states the explicit legal right to leave the EU, and a procedure to do so.
The stated aim of the treaty was "to complete the process started by the Treaty of Amsterdam [1997] and by the Treaty of Nice [2001] with a view to enhancing the efficiency and democratic legitimacy of the Union and to improving the coherence of its action." Opponents of the Treaty of Lisbon, such as former Danish Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Jens-Peter Bonde, argued that it would centralize the EU, and weaken democracy by 'moving power away' from national electorates. Supporters argue that it brings in more checks and balances into the EU system, with stronger powers for the European Parliament

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Versailles. DBQ

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The summer of 1914 in Europe came along with one of the mast disastrous and bloody wars that ever existed on the planet. The Great War of World War 1 as it is called, violent discontent between so no many different countries in the world in which many died. By 1917, after many difficulties of neutrality, the United "States had to enter the Great War.…

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Versalliers

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The viewpoint to ratify the Treaty because it would create a safer more peaceful Europe(point1) has good intentions; however, without the input of all nations affected , you will most certainly have distrust from other nations who don’t have a “seat at the table”. They needed to be included in the decision making in order to feel empowerd about their future. The Creation of “a genral association of nations”(point 14), while also a noble cause, dosen’t work if all nations are not members. You would have only some nations following the rules which allows the nations that aren’t part of the League of Nations to stockpile weapons and invade other countries, which is what started WWI in the first place. Every country has to be a member in order for it to work.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Paris

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Paris of 1763 was a treaty that officially ended the French and Indian War. This treaty was signed on February 10, 1763 by England, France, and Spain. The French and Indian War was a more wide European conflict in which England and Prussia went against France, Austria, Russia and Spain. The major cause of the war was the struggle for territorial expansion among the land west of the Appalachian Mountains, know then as the Ohio Territory.This war was also known as the Seven Years War and The Treaty of Paris concluded it. During the Treaty of Paris in 1763, France lost Canada and all claims to the territory east of the Mississippi to Great Britain, but gained back Martinique and Guadeloupe. Meanwhile Spain with the desire to recover Cuba, which Britain had taken from them gave up Florida in exchange. To recompense its ally France gave all of Louisiana west of the Mississippi and New Orleans to Spain, but with these being the only exceptions, England now had the whole land of North America east of the Mississippi in its power. The majority of Spanish and African occupants of Florida left and established somewhere else in parts of the Spanish empire, but all French settlers maintained occupying Canada, the Illinois country, and Spanish Louisiana. Over all the triumph, on the race for the most power, was for England. As understood the British colonies were experiencing great happiness at this point because the warfare seemed over at last. For them this meant that the colonies could now develop their extensive resources in an imperial partnership and share their never before experienced prosperity. However, this treaty was only going to begin to tear the colonies and the mother country…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Treaty of Paris 1783

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Short after the battle of Yorktown in 1781, talks of peace began to linger in the English Parliament and in the Continental Congress. Although, back in those days Parliament was infamous for being unstable, and most of the time it depended on the House of Commons and the good favor or the King. When the news of the defeat…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Versailles

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Though the opposition to the Treaty by Congress may have had some part in its failure, Wilson’s inflexibility and bullheadedness on his views and ideas toward the Treaty of Versailles was the main factor in its downfall. Wilson did everything in his power to convince the people of the United States that the Treaty of Versailles should be approved by the Senate. Wilson's strong feelings toward the Treaty made it difficult, even impossible, to convert his thoughts of it to anything other than what they already are. He felt he had already compromised enough, letting France, Great Britain, and Italy scrap most of his 14 Points; he wasn't about to let his own country throw out the one thing he still had: the League of Nations.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three European communities, with the Economic Community as the most prominent, were established by the 1951 Treaty of Paris and the 1958 Treaties of Rome. As an Integral part of this new system, The European Court of Justice created a large amount of new case law, it was stated that this case law was different to International law and so a new legal order had been established. It was different due to the involvement of the individual. This is reflected via the provision in the Treaty of Rome that elections to the European Parliament should now be direct which allows citizens of every member state to directly participate. Although the Parliament had existed before, the extent to which it was representative was doubtful, this change increased the importance of the European Parliament and therefore gave more force to the legislation that it drafted. The direct elections give the European parliament a legitimacy that other international institutions lack and it was argued that this new found legitimacy…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Treaty of Versailles

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles marked the official end of the Great War, with all the major combatants arriving at a resolution to the conflict. Simultaneously, the treaty also set the stage for the following world war in that the terms agreed upon by the treaty upset the centuries-old European balance that sought to prevent continental conflict. Germany, defeated by the Allies during the Great War, was not in a position to dictate the terms of surrender. Simultaneously, social and political factors in Britain, France and Italy forced treaty terms inimical to both short and long-term interests for Germany. While the Central Powers during the Great War comprised of more nations than Germany alone, the brunt of reprisals fell upon Germany as the leader of the defeated alliance. The resultant effect of the treaty obligations imposed upon Germany by the majority of the victorious allies were felt across the board in Germany in terms of financial strictures and burdens that crippled the German economy, preventing her rise (articles 119, 217, 259, 292). Moreover, the victorious nations demanded nothing less than what amounted to a decimation of Germany’s defensive capabilities, insisting upon the crippling of her military (articles 43, 428, 433). In addition, the Allies imposed territorial losses to the victors that not only stripped Germany of much needed economic means following such a destructive war but also divided the nation. These included not only colonial possessions across the world but more intimate losses in the form of Alsace-Lorraine, Northern Schleswig, Posen, Silesia and others (articles 31 - 33). Considering the number of impositions and treaty obligations Germany faced, pinpointing a singular item on the articles of the treaty that proved most burdensome to the average German citizen is difficult. However, considering the historical…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    World War I, known as the Great War, was the first total war between the European nations. Many soldiers had died in the terrible conditions of the trenches. Not only were countless lives lost in the war, but land, especially in France and Belgium, were also destroyed. There were also many controversies when the Great War finally ended. Many leaders had different and conflicting opinions on how the treaty was going to be put together. Some, like Clemenceau and Lloyd George of Britain, wanted the Treaty of Versailles to punish and blame Germany for starting the war. Others, like Woodrow Wilson of the US, felt that laying blame would not lead to peace. The United States, France, and Britain were called the "Big Three," since they dominated in…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    treaty versailles

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Treaty of Versailles, making peace between Germany and the ratifying allied powers, NOW IN EFFECT!…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Entering the EEC (after the treaty of Maastricht changed its name to EU), UK needed the provisions of the…

    • 1457 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The First World War, one of the most devastating wars to ever take place in the history of mankind, had finally ended in 1918. However, after the defeat of Germany a dilemma arose over how the world should end this massive war so that it will prevent any other wars from ever taking place and under what terms and punishment Germany will now face. The "Big Four" (Lloyd George of Britain, Orlando of Italy, Clemenceau of France, and Woodrow Wilson of the U.S.), leaders of the four strongest nation during the era, met on June 28 1919 in Paris, where they came to an agreements on terms under one document known as The Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty of Versailles, ratified in 1919, was created with intentions to end a war that will end all wars (First…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Article 1 of this treaty makes it clear that 'The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty and on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as 'the Treaties '). Those two Treaties shall have the same legal value. The Union shall replace and succeed the European Community. '…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    - The Treaties (the TEU and the TFEU) would cease to apply, including as part of those, the fundamental freedoms (free movement of goods, services, capital and persons/workers) meaning that the protection of UK citizens either living in or intending to move to an EU Member State will disappear. UK nationals will require visas just to visit any MS and stringent requirements will apply to workers visas. Such rights, which derive from fundamental freedoms and are directly enforceable in UK courts, will be deprived to nationals of other Member States residing in the UK.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Treaty of Sevres

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between 1914 and 1919 millions of lives were taken by the First World War. It created chaos socially, economically and politically leaving nations devastated. After the First World War a peace conference took place in Paris in which representatives from 27 nations across the globe gathered. This peace conference was to decide the fate of the defeated countries which included Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. While the situation in Europe held priority for most delegations the ‘Middle Eastern Question’ also required intense discussion. The Treaty of Sevres was drawn up at the San Remo conference, which dealt with the fate of the Ottoman Empire, in April 1920. This treaty primarily abolished the empire and eradicated Turkish sovereignty. It also created an autonomous Kurdish zone and granted Armenia independence. Economically, capitulations were reintroduced and the allies took control of the Empire’s finances through the Ottoman Bank. It has been argued that the Treaty of Sevres was too harsh and that disaster was inevitable as a result. This essay will look at certain aspects of the treaty which contribute both for and against the argument. It will look mainly at the Ottoman Empire as a whole; from the partitioning of the land which neglected to acknowledge ‘true’ Turkish territory to the effect of the allied total control over the economy through the Finance Commission. Contrastingly, the Treaty of Sevres has been seen by some as realistic considering the circumstances. As well as this, the treaty complied to a certain extent with the idea of self determination. This affected the Kurds and created the democratic republic of Armenia by granting autonomy, independence and international recognition to these zones. The above points are all valid when considering how the Treaty of Sevres should be viewed in the 21st century.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Union itself, and for the approach for any actions outside of the EU. That’s how the…

    • 4208 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays