Preview

The True Meaning Behind Google's Logo

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The True Meaning Behind Google's Logo
Julio Beltran
Dr. Skinner
Introduction to psychology
October 9, 2013 Google’s Logo and its Color Interpretation

Many of us have seen the google logo and its colors, but how many of us can recall the colors of the logo in its exact order?
The theory behind this notion is that we as individuals do not remember things depending on the sequence in which we see them. Remembering a commodity, weather its short term or long term, is often more durable when it holds a significant value or relevant purpose towards you. In other words, we tend to remember things that can be useful to our survival and wellbeing rather than the unnecessary ones. With that said it makes sense that most of us would not quite remember certain objects that are seen on an everyday biases, such as Google’s color arrangement or the way Abrahams face is facing to right side. Things that hold no significant or materialistic value to us are rapidly forgotten.
Although this is truly a fascinating theory, it is only a theory and therefore it should be treated as mere speculation. Research has demonstrated that even memories which have not been rehearsed or remembered are remarkably stable in long-term memory.
Now, let’s address the true meaning for why we are going into detail of this theory, regarding memory. Google is by far one of the most commonly known names and logos in the search engine industry, and being the professionals they are, we have to expect some sort of mind stratagem being used on their logo to achieve some sort of end result, weather that would be making the software more suitable and memorable or just simply making the colors look staggering. We can’t help but wonder what lies behind googles color trademark. After all we do see this take place in other multi-billion dollar corporations such as Facebook.
Although there are many assumptions made as to why google picked this odd color motif of blue, red, yellow, blue green, red. The truth is particularly plain and



Cited: Mohs, Richard C..  "How Human Memory Works"  08 May 2007.  HowStuffWorks.com. 10 October 2013. Widrich, Leo. "Why Is Facebook Blue? The Science Behind Colors In Marketing | Fast Company | Business Innovation." Fast Company. Fast Company, 6 May 2013. Web. 10 Oct. 2013. Zjawinski, Sonia. "The Brains Behind Google’s Primary Logo." Wired.com. Conde Nast Digital, 16 Jan. 2008. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doogle Analysis

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On certain occasions, the logo on Google's webpage will change to a special version, known as a "Google Doodle". Clicking on the Doodle links to a string of Google search results about the topic. Google doodles are also used to depict major events, like its own anniversary, the celebration of historical events ect.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    wk 6 individual

    • 2031 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Strauss, S. (2013, May 22). Think Branding, with Google - Conference Keynote - "Branding in the New Normal". Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1l2CUjkg0ug.com…

    • 2031 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doogle Research Paper

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Google takes into consideration all of the visual elements in each design that goes into the creation of Google as a whole. The designers keep a harmony between icons. If you look at the icons, they all maintain a similar visual connection. The same shade of the four colors in the Google logo are repeated within the Google icons. Everything is simplistic, and makes up straight forward geometric forms. All of the icons face forward. Some contain a degree of shadow. The shadows follow the curvature of the form. Typically, the color is always repeated in the same order when on a graphic; Blue, Red, Yellow, Green. In order to make the icons the same sizes, they are lined…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our memories are also constructive and easily influenced by all sorts of factors: stress, expectation, belief, and the introduction of new information. Added to all this is the selectivity of memory. We selectively remember certain things and ignore others, setting up a recall bias. No wonder the recall of eyewitness is often unreliable.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humans store vast amounts of info in long-term memory: relatively permanentand limitless storehouse of the memory system…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stage

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This can be used as a criticism of the multi-store model of memory because the MSM implies that the only way that you will remember something is through rehearsal but (as this case study proves) you are also able to remember things if they are interesting, funny or distinctive, therefore making them “stick in the mind”.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Invisible Gorilla

    • 1012 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book, The Invisible Gorilla, Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons introduce several different illusions and discuss how our intuitions are easily capable of deceiving us. Upon reading this book, I find the second chapter, Illusion of Memory, one of the most interesting ones. In this chapter, it reveals that an individual’s memory is very limited and unreliable. The certainty of one’s recollection does not always guarantee correctness. Chabris and Simmons explain how the majority of people tend to believe that memories are stored forever exactly the way they happened and remember every detail, however, their brain really only stores significant events not every little detail.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inside the Mind of Google

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Google’s greatest creation is its Internet search engine. In 2008 it is estimated that Google earned more than $4 billion in profits and more than 95% of that profit was tied to its advertising coming from its search engine. Google’s search engine was able to revolutionize the way an Internet search engine gave results to a particular search that was conducted. A basic search engine would stack results based on the amount of times your search term appears on each site. On the other hand, Google stacks its results based on its relevance and importance to that…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, an issue to raise with this theory is the question of what is actually is that we are remembering. We cannot know what it is we are remembering if we have no knowledge of it in the first place. ' Admittedly this assertion of the impossibility of knowing what a thing is like without knowing…

    • 1049 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “How stupid is Google making us?” by William Badke responds to Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr supports his argument by stating the fact that he has totally lost his ability to think and read and that the longer we work online, the less tolerance we have to concentrate and contemplate. William Badke seems to support his argument but not completely. He discusses his opinion on technology and whether it impacts human thinking. He is against the fact that Google is indeed making us stupid. He stated that there are different versions of stupidity and it depends on how the people use that stupidity. He said that people have the ability to use their intellectual skills to great potential. William Badke’s quote, “…the deep reading capability is never actually lost.” Prior to that quote, he mentioned that the long-term brain activity is still available to the people but the fact that the internet is meeting most of the people’s needs and deep concentration is not called upon. He stated, “This doesn’t mean they are stupid, just their priorities are different. True, it now appears that we can continuously rewire our brains throughout our life-times depending on what we do with them.” Basically, what Badke is trying to say that we are have not become stupid because of the internet. He is contradicting Nicholas Carr’s idea on the fact the internet has made us become stupid.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person’s memory is one of their most prized possessions. We use our memory to store or recall information, along with some of our most deeply treasured moments caught in time. The memory process has baffled scientist, along with the common people of the world, over centuries. The memory process and the brain is a tedious organ in the body that is extremely difficult to comprehend. An everyday analogy for a person’s memory is it is like a library.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay is going to look at how the Multi Store Model of Memory works and how it compares with The Working Memory Model. It will also look at three theories of forgetting (Cue Dependent, Interference and Trace Decay) and show the evidence that supports or criticises the models and theories.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Numerous studies have been conducted seeking to understand human memory. For some time it was believed and widely accepted that memory operated in a multistore approach (Craik & Lockhart, 1972). This approach comprised of memory going through three levels: sensory storage which is when information is stored whether someone is paying attention to the information or not, short-term memory (STM) which is when information can be recalled in a short amount of time, and long-term memory (LTM) which is when information can be recalled after a considerable amount of time (Craik & Lockhart, 1972). While the multistore approach did address the overall structure of memory, it was not without its criticisms, such as, the exact amount of information that…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    psychpaper

    • 1224 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: 1. Hockenbury, Don H., and Sandra E. Hockenbury. "Chapter 6- Memory." Psychology. 5th ed. New York: Worth, 2010. 282-83. Print…

    • 1224 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Rise of Google

    • 1772 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kettler, S. (2014). The google chronicles: 7 facts on founders Larry Page & Sergey Brin. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://www.biography.com/news/google-founders-history-facts…

    • 1772 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays