The Stock Market and Corporate
Investment: A Test of Catering Theory
London School of Economics
Northwestern University, CEPR, and NBER
We test a catering theory describing how stock market mispricing might inﬂuence individual ﬁrms’ investment decisions. We use discretionary accruals as our proxy for mispricing. We ﬁnd a positive relation between abnormal investment and discretionary accruals; that abnormal investment is more sensitive to discretionary accruals for ﬁrms with higher R&D intensity (opaque ﬁrms) or share turnover (ﬁrms with shorter shareholder horizons); that ﬁrms with high abnormal investment subsequently have low stock returns; and that the larger the relative price premium, the stronger the abnormal return predictability. We show that patterns in abnormal returns are stronger for ﬁrms with higher R&D intensity or share turnover. (JEL G14, G31)
In this paper, we study whether mispricing in the stock market has consequences for ﬁrm investment policy. We test a “catering” channel, through which deviations from fundamentals may affect investment decisions directly. If the market misprices ﬁrms according to their level of investment, managers may try to boost short-run share prices by catering to current sentiment. Firms with ample cash or debt capacity may have an incentive to waste resources in negative NPV projects when their stock price is overpriced and to forgo positive investment opportunities when their stock price is undervalued. Managers with shorter shareholder horizons, and those whose assets are more difﬁcult to value, should cater more.
This paper previously circulated with the title “The Real Effects of Investor Sentiment.” We thank an anonymous referee, Andy Abel, Malcolm Baker, David Brown, David Chapman, Randy Cohen, Kent Daniel, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Terrance Odean, Owen Lamont, Patricia Ledesma, Vojislav Maksimovic, Bob McDonald, Mitchell Petersen, Fabio Schiantarelli, Andrei Shleifer, Jeremy Stein, Tuomo Vuolteenaho, Ivo Welch, Luigi Zingales, and seminar participants at Harvard Business School, Helsinki School of Economics, London Business School, McGill University, University of Chicago, University of Virginia, the AFA 2003 meeting, the NBER Behavioral Finance Program meeting, the Texas Finance Festival, the University of Illinois Bear Markets conference, the Yale School of Management, the WFA 2002 meeting, and the Zell Center Conference on “Risk Perceptions and Capital Markets.” We thank Sandra Sizer for editorial assistance. We acknowledge support from the Investment Analysts Society of Chicago Michael J. Borrelli CFA Research Grant Award. Polk acknowledges the support of the Searle Fund. The usual caveat applies. Send correspondence to Paola Sapienza, Finance Department, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Rd., Evanston IL 60208; telephone: 1-847-491-7436; fax: 1-847-491-5719; E-mail: Paola-Sapienza@northwestern.edu. C The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn030
Advance Access publication April 2, 2008
The Review of Financial Studies / v 22 n 1 2009
We rely on discretionary accruals, a measure of the extent to which the ﬁrm has abnormal noncash earnings, to identify mispricing. Firms with high discretionary accruals have relatively low stock returns in the future, suggesting that they are overpriced. We regress ﬁrm-level investment on discretionary accruals while controlling for investment opportunities, as measured by Tobin’s Q.
We ﬁnd a positive relation between discretionary accruals and ﬁrm investment. Our result is robust to several alternative speciﬁcations, as well as to corrections for measurement error in Tobin’s Q, our proxy for investment opportunities.
Exploiting the intuition of Stein’s (1996) short-horizons model,...
References: Abel, A., and O. Blanchard. 1986. The Present Value of Proﬁts and Cyclical Movements in Investment. Econometrica 54:249–74.
Abel, A., and J. Eberly. 2002. Investment and Q with Fixed Costs: An Empirical Analysis. Working Paper,
Baker, M., J. Stein, and J. Wurgler. 2003. When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of
Baker, M., and J. Wurgler. 2000. The Equity Share in New Issues and Aggregate Stock Returns. Journal of
Baker, M., and J. Wurgler. 2002. Market Timing and Capital Structure. Journal of Finance 57:1–32.
Baker, M., and J. Wurgler. 2004. A Catering Theory of Dividends. Journal of Finance 59:271–88.
Barro, R. 1990. The Stock Market and Investment. The Review of Financial Studies 3:115–31.
Bergstresser, D., M. A. Desai, and J. Rauh. 2004. Earnings Manipulation and Managerial Investment Decisions:
Evidence from Sponsored Pension Plans
Blanchard, O., C. Rhee, and L. Summers. 1993. The Stock Market, Proﬁt and Investment. Quarterly Journal of
Bond, S., and J. Cummins. 2000. The Stock Market and Investment in the New Economy: Some Tangible Facts
and Intangible Fictions
Carhart, M. 1997. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance 52(1):57–82.
Chan, K., K. C. Chan, N. Jegadeesh, and J. Lakonishok. 2001. Earnings Quality and Stock Returns. NBER,
Working Paper No
Chirinko, R., and H. Schaller. 2001. Business Fixed Investment and “Bubbles” : The Japanese Case. American
Economic Review 91:663–80.
Cochrane, J. 1991. Production-Based Asset Pricing and the Link Between Stock Returns and Economic Fluctuations. Journal of Finance 46:209–37.
Cohen, R., C. Polk, and T. Vuolteenaho. 2003. The Value Spread. Journal of Finance 58:609–41.
Cooper, M. J., O. Dimitrov, and P. R. Rau. 2001. A Rose.com by Any Other Name. Journal of Finance 56:2371–
Cooper, M. J., A. Khorana, I. Osobov, A. Patel, and P. R. Rau. 2005. Managerial Actions in Response to a
Market Downturn: Valuation Effects of Name Changes in the Dot.com Decline
Daniel, K., and S. Titman. 2006. Market Reactions to Tangible and Intangible Information. Journal of Finance
Dow, J., and G. Gorton. 1997. Stock Market Efﬁciency and Economic Efﬁciency: Is There a Connection? Journal
of Finance 52:1087–1129.
Erickson, T., and T. M. Whited. 2000. Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and Q.
Erickson, T., and T. M. Whited. 2002. Two-step GMM Estimation of the Errors-in-variables Model Using
Fama, E. 1970. Efﬁcient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance 25:383–
Fama, E., and K. French. 1993. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial
Fama, E., and K. French. 2000. Forecasting Proﬁtability and Earnings. Journal of Business 72:161–75.
Fama, E., and J. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy
Froot, K., D. Scharfstein, and J. Stein. 1994. A Framework for Risk Management. Harvard Business Review
Gaspar, J. M., M. Massa, and P. Matos. 2005. Shareholder Investment Horizons and the Market for Corporate
Gilchrist, S., and C. Himmelberg. 1995. Evidence on the Role of Cash Flow for Investment. Journal of Monetary
Gilchrist, S., C. Himmelberg, and G. Huberman. 2005. Do Stock Price Bubbles Inﬂuence Corporate Investment?
Journal of Monetary Economics 52:805–27.
Hand, J. 1990. Did Firms Undertake Debt-equity Swaps for an Accounting Paper Proﬁt or True Financial Gain?
The Accounting Review 64:587–623.
Hribar, P., and D. Collins. 2002. Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research. Journal of
Accounting Research 40:105–34.
Jensen, M. C. 2005. Agency Costs of Overvalued Equity. Working Paper No. 04-26, Harvard NOM; Finance
Working Paper No
Jones, J. 1991. Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigation. Journal of Accouting Research 29:193–
Kaplan, S., and L. Zingales. 1997. Do Financing Constraints Explain Why Investment is Correlated with Cash
Flow? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:168–216.
Lamont, O. 2000. Investment Plans and Stock Returns. Journal of Finance 55:2719–45.
Lintner, J. 1956. The Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings and Taxes.
Maines, L., and J. Hand. 1996. Individuals’ Perceptions and Misperceptions of the Time Series Properties of
Mayer, C. 1988. A New Test of Capital Structure. European Economic Review 32:1167–89.
Mayer, C., and O. Sussman. 2003. New Issues in Corporate Finance. Working Paper, Oxford University.
Miller, M., and F. Modigliani. 1961. Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1990. The Stock Market and Investment: Is the Market a Sideshow?.
Newey, W. K., and K. D. West. 1987. A Simple, Positive Semi-Deﬁnite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation
Consistent Covariance Matrix
Panageas, S. 2005. The Neoclassical q Theory of Investment in Speculative Markets. Mimeo, The Wharton
School, University of Pennsylvania.
Polk, C., and P. Sapienza. 2004. The Real Effects of Investor Sentiment. Working Paper No. 10563, NBER.
Polk, C., S. Thompson, and T. Vuolteenaho. 2006. Cross-sectional Forecasts of the Equity Premium. Journal of
Financial Economics 81:101–41.
Rajan, R., and L. Zingales. 1995. What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International
Rhodes-Kropf, M., D. Robinson, and S. Viswanathan. 2004. Valuation Waves and Merger Activity: The Empirical
Please join StudyMode to read the full document