Preview

The Kansas-Nebraska Act

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Kansas-Nebraska Act
The Kansas-Nebraska act was a proposal by Sen. Stephen A. Douglas which said that Kansas and Nebraska territory could be allowed to govern for itself whether or not to be a slave state or a free state. By a vote of its residents the territories would become a slave or a free state.This caused many fights between Northerners and Southerners. As a result many people were killed.

This act was fair because it gave the majority of the population the choice. This would be better because if the government just said that the land was a free state the people who had slaves would have to move out of their state and travel to a slave state, so they could keep their slaves and not have to sell them. It would be good because the people who have the choice
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment
    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment

    Kansas Nebraska Act- 1854 created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opened new lands, repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and allowed settlers in those territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil war political system
    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil war political system

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the sparks to the civil war. This Act allowed Kansas and Nebraska to become a territory in the United States. But there was a law called Popular Sovereignty. In these two new territories there were pro-slavery people and anti-slavery people. Popular Sovereignty stated that the people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska could vote on whether or not there would be slavery in the territory. Now if you think about it there are people that are for slavery and people that are against slavery in the same territory voting on whether or not there should be slavery in that territory. Of course there was going to be some tension between all the people, and tension leads to fights and arguments. Fights and arguments lead to wars, civil wars!…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Controversy Before the Civil War
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Controversy Before the Civil War

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act and Dred Scott Case (1857) decision highlighted the slavery disagreement and caused even more problems between the Northern and Southern States, pushing the U.S. even closer to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, passed in 1854 as a small compromise, enforced popular sovereignty in Kansas and Nebraska, creating disagreements over whether these territories would choose to become free or slave states. The Kansas-Nebraska Act even created tensions over the overturned Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had held the nation together by allowing slavery north of the already created line. In result, pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups flooded Kansas and battled in the…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Causes of the Civil War
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Causes of the Civil War

    The issue on slavery was one of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South’s economy. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery, which they thought was a disgrace to the Union. Compromises were proposed working toward an end to slavery. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise, which made Maine, a free state, and Missouri, a slave state, and everything above the 36° 30 north latitude free. Other compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 did please both sides. The Compromise included admitting California as a free state and interstate slave trade to be abolished which went in favor of the North. The Compromise also went with the South when it included stricter fugitive slave laws in document 7, the Kansas Nebraska Act, made it possible for new states to decide if they were going to be free, or slave states. The North and the South were far from settling the slave issue.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise Analysis
    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Analysis

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny Definition Essay
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Manifest Destiny Definition Essay

    The Kansas-Nebrask Act was an 1854 a bill that mandated "popular sovereignty" -giving settlers the choice to decide whether slavery would be allowed or not. Making each state a pro-slavery state or an anti-slavery state. The pro-slavery and anti-slavery states later caused huge peridos of viloence in the time line like the Bleeding Kansas, and was a major part in the reason the…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War inevitable
    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil War inevitable

    Nevertheless, after seizing Mexico and the spreading of territories westward the South depended highly on slavery because of the "cotton king". One of these territories included the Kansas-Nebraska where many newcomers and the proslavery settlers began to move into the territory. In this territory after the 1852 election, the temporary peace of the Compromise of 1850 came to an end. Senator Stephen Douglas passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act which created two new territories of Kansas and Nebraska. The status of slavery in the area was decided to be by popular sovereignty. This act wrecked two compromises The Compromise of 1820, and 1850, and the democratic party. While the act formed a new party: the Republicans.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bleeding Kansas

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 set the scene by allowing the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide by popular sovereignty, an idea advocated by US Senator Stephan A. Douglas, if they would be free or slave states. The government assumed that few slave owners would attempt to settle in Kansas and make it a slave state, because it was thought to be too far north for profitable exploitation of slaves. Instead, it resulted in immigration to Kansas by activists from both sides, which began the bloody wars of slavery which lasted from 1854 to 1858.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The 1820 Missouri Compromise
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The 1820 Missouri Compromise

    Research Task- Describe the role of the 1820 Missouri Compromise in the campaign against slavery!…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850

    (3) The Kansas – Nebraska Act was a piece of legislation and Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois was their spokesperson, this was partly because he supported the construction of a transcontinental railroad which linked Chicago to California. (4) But, for this act to be effective it was necessary to repeal the Missouri Compromise. As well as the boundary restrictions on the territorial extension of slavery that was in place with the Missouri Compromise. This act wasn’t effective and because it was ineffective. This act did not…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Slavery and States' Rights
    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Slavery and States' Rights

    Southern dependence on a staple crop (mostly cotton), and northern industrialist society caused a contrast between the views of the north and south. While the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed pro- and anti-slavery factions to coexist for a time, growing economic differences between the northern and southern states made it much harder for compromises to exist. In 1850 a very thin majority was willing to accept a North where slavery was barred and a South that had the institution. That was the status quo. Unfortunately, rumors of succession floated the air and concerned many northerners. In a speech to the Senate, Senator Daniel Webster stated, “I hold the idea of a separation of these states-those that are free to form one government and those that are slaveholding to form another- as a moral impossibility.” (Doc D) This is mentioned to show that the states could no separate by any line because they wouldn’t be able to satisfy everyone. The Union must stay together in order to prosper. In 1854, trying to keep the South from succeeding, Sen. Stephen A. Douglas very foolishly got a law passed that changed the status of slavery. Instead of…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Missouri Compromise
    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Compromise

    In 1819, the territory of Missouri applied for statehood. It was the first new state to be taken from the land acquired in the Louisiana Purchase. The issue of Missouri attempting to become a state sparked much debate and controversy. The debate in Congress was mainly about sectional power and not whether slavery was right or wrong. The people from the North disagreed with the added representation in Congress and in the Electoral College. Since Missouri would be a slave state, they would be able to count three-fifths of their slave population towards representation. The three-fifths rule had already added significant power to the South. In 1790, the South controlled 47 percent of Congress while only having 40 percent of the white population. The crisis brought the commitment of slavery and the resentment of Southern political power to a heated collision. The North vowed to give up no more land to slavery, while the South began talks of dissolving the union and civil war.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    The Missouri Compromise is commonly thought of as the beginning of American sectionalism, although the signs were visible long before 1819. The crisis solved by the compromise certainly alerted the South for the need for political unity in order to maintain its way of life in the face of a more populous North. Likewise, it alerted both regions to the political problems inherent in westward expansion. The Missouri Compromise did not create sectionalism, but it is important as the first possible signs of sectionalist differences in the US.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Research Paper
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Research Paper

    The Missouri Compromise was created in 1820 to put an end to the conflict between the slave and non-slave states, however, it only caused the conflict to worsen. The dispute began to get worse and worse, eventually making the sectionalism between the North and South increase. The Missouri Compromise ignited sectionalism within the United States, which further contributed to a terrible War.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding Kansas: The Cause Of The Civil War
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bleeding Kansas: The Cause Of The Civil War

    Bleeding Kansas also took part in causing the Civil War. Bleeding Kansas was a war between the anti-slavery and pro-slavery activists. It took place between 1855 to 1861 (Ponce). Missouri was a slave state and Kansas had not yet decided to be pro-slavery or anti-slavery, and because the two sections did not agree with each other, that caused a war. “Yet the violence that broke out in the 1850s was an unintended consequence of the territory’s organization” (Ponce). President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in May 1854. Kansas could settle anywhere under the doctrine of popular sovereignty and allowed residents to determine their state institutions for themselves (Ponce). “While its geography should have meant a free Kansas, residents…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics