Preview

The Four Causes of Aristotle: a Summary of Pre-Socratic Thought

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Four Causes of Aristotle: a Summary of Pre-Socratic Thought
Aristotle, being the first historian of philosophy, categorized his predecessors according to how they’ve answered the central questions of the human mind – the question of the first principle of all things. It is otherwise known as the Four Causes. He defined science as knowledge through causes. This doctrine of causes is scattered in different Aristotelian treatises but have its highlight in his book Metaphysics. This principle of causality is an essential part of Aristotelian thought. In his mind, Aristotle argued that events happen for a cause which will explain its origin, end and the way it came to be. For him, “everything that comes to be is due to causes.” He criticized his predecessors for their not having clearly explained the why of this, that, and so on. Chance, mythology or fortuitous events are not sufficient enough to solve the problem of cosmology. These causes are divided into four distinct types. He developed this principle from the standpoint of being. For this reason, the basic Aristotelian division is between actual and potential causes, contrary to the traditional division made by the scholastics between intrinsic and extrinsic. As for the actual cause, there is the formal, efficient and final causes and for the potency only the material cause; in the traditional scholastic division, material and formal causes made up the intrinsic cause while the remaining two makes the extrinsic cause. Each of these causes can be shortly defined as follows:
1. Material Cause is the constitutive element from which something is made from.
2. Formal Cause means the form of something, “it is what determines its essence to be what it is”
3. Efficient Cause is the being who made that something.
4. Final Cause is that for what sake something exists, “it is what constitutes the perfection of the being” . In other words, it is the purpose of that being. The final cause is the summation of all other causes; it is where every other cause can be founded.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The final cause – the purpose of the object, i.e. to provide shelter, warmth, comfort, safety.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chrysippus argued that the cause is action or event that results in another action or event. He also stated that the cause, as well as, the body is all existent. The event that results from the cause is non-existent instead, therefore, a predicate. The cause of an event is inferred as ‘because’ while that which it causes is inferred as ‘why’. The cause and effect, according to Chrysippus, are not only relative but also inseparable. Chrysippus provided a distinction between “auxiliary and proximate” causes and “perfect and principal” causes. He argues that antecedent causes, when they are auxiliary and proximate, render their effects necessary. Perfect and principal causes, when they are antecedent, render their effects necessary. On the other…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will: (i) state the premises and conclusion of St. Thomas Aquinas's “Uncaused Cause” argument, I will argue that the argument is a deductive argument. Merriam-Webster.com's definition of cause is: “something or someone that produces an effect, result, or condition: something or someone that makes something happen or exist”. (www.merriam-webster.com) A deductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that the conclusion is true. An inductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that in most cases the conclusion is true. I will argue that the argument is a priori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that can be obtain based…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the four causes answer a "why?" question. Aristotle believed that to gain a complete answer we needed to know the answer to each of the four causes. But not all objects will have four causes. For example a universal triangle has a final cause that states its definition but it does not have an efficient cause as it does not come into being but it purely exists. Nor does it have a final cause and it does not have a goal or end.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This then leads Descartes to put the causal principle and ideas together, establishing causal principle ideas. Descartes asks if the cause of the idea of something can be a mode. As stated above, the cause of an effect must have more reality that the effect itself. An idea…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Teleological Argument

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A "teleological" argument or explanation is one that explains the cause of things or events in terms of the aims, intentions, ends, or "designs". The word "design" in these discussions is used in the sense of a "pre-arranged purpose". Intelligence is implied in any being with plans and designs, and when "intelligent design" is proposed as a cause for anything, this means that something can not have happened purely by chance or "dumb luck" The concept of harmony within the universe begun in classical philosophy and evolved throughout time.…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Answer: God is the first cause of everything. The cause Aquinas has in mind is not about chronological set of events, but rather simultaneously existing dependency relationships.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Aristotle’s book The Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle goes in depth on the differences between voluntary and involuntary actions. Aristotle poses and the question, as humans, what makes our actions voluntary or involuntary, and when should we be held responsible for our actions? Are there exceptions to the differences between voluntary and involuntary actions in certain scenarios? When can we truly hold an individual responsible for their actions, and are there exceptions for this too? Aristotle makes it apparent that the differences between what is involuntary and voluntary can, at times, be difficult to identify, and often times there is a blurred, fine line between the two. Because of this, many possible scenarios are border-line between being voluntary and involuntary. This causes further dilemma when asked, “If someone’s action cannot decisively be determined to be one of the two, can you still hold the person responsible?” In this paper, I will examine the differences, as described by Aristotle in The Nicomachean Ethics, between voluntary and involuntary actions, and argue when individuals should be held responsible for their actions.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Hume, an empiricist and a materialist, was bent on showing that all ideas are derived from impressions we gain through sensory experiences by means of the three principles of association namely, resemblance, contiguity in time and place and cause and effect. Causal relationships (cause and effect) are the basis for all reasoning concerning matters of fact. Human beings believe that to know something fully, one must know the cause upon which it necessarily depends. Hume criticizes this notion by raising some arguments which would be discussed in the paragraphs that follow.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now, we go all the way back to the beginning of existence. The separation of the idea of cause from the beginning of existence is possible in the imagination. Hume says that we do not need to associate a cause with the beginning of…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9 of Aristotle's Physics: A Guided Study can be understood in such a way that it…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Aristotle. “Metaphysics.” Great Books of the Western World. Ed. Mortimer J. Adler. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 1993. 499-626.…

    • 2865 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle S Four Causes

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle observed that the world was constantly changing, a movement from potentiality to actuality. One of Aristotle’s examples, whiteness, shows that something that is ‘not white’ has the potential to become ‘actually white’. Aristotle came to the conclusion that there are stages, due to the movement from potentiality to actuality. He called these the ‘four causes’: Material, Formal, Efficient and Final causes.…

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle and His Numerous

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As an important figure head in the field of philosophy, Aristotle and his numerous influences will be detailed. Identification and evaluation of key concepts and analyses that comprised his theories will be discussed along with identification and description of his contributions to the field of philosophy will also be offered. Lastly, further discussion will focus on how the culture and the time period influenced his ideology.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics