Preview

David Hume on Causal Relations

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume on Causal Relations
David Hume, an empiricist and a materialist, was bent on showing that all ideas are derived from impressions we gain through sensory experiences by means of the three principles of association namely, resemblance, contiguity in time and place and cause and effect. Causal relationships (cause and effect) are the basis for all reasoning concerning matters of fact. Human beings believe that to know something fully, one must know the cause upon which it necessarily depends. Hume criticizes this notion by raising some arguments which would be discussed in the paragraphs that follow. First of all, Hume asserts that, the causal relationship between any two objects is based on experience, and is not known through reasoning.. No one can reason to find an effect in a cause. For instance, if Adam were created with perfect rational faculties, prior to experience, he still could not tell from the properties of water that it would suffocate him. He would know this through experience alone. However, our inductive reasoning regarding experience is derived from custom and not from understanding. Hence, experience cannot establish a necessary connection between cause and effect. Secondly, to Hume, the reason why we mistakenly infer that there is something in the cause that necessarily produces its effect is because our past experiences have inclined us to think so. However, we can imagine, without contradiction, a case that a cause does not produce its usual effect. For instance, there would be no logical contradiction if one was to postulate that the sun will not rise tomorrow because to Hume, it is not the case that the future will always resemble the past. He therefore asserts that, knowledge of unobserved facts cannot be attained.
In a nut-shell, Hume doubts the rational foundation of everything that is useful and helps us get by in the world. All actions and speculations are based upon supposition of cause and effect. He asserts that the link we establish between cause and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Hume argues that all a priori knowledge is of relations of ideas, and so analytic. All knowledge of synthetic propositions, matters of fact, is a posteriori. It depends either on present experience or causal…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume argued, that although sometimes a good motive does not bring about pleasurable outcomes, we are able to appreciate it . This is made possible by our imagination and our belief of cause and effect, with which we are able to visualize thus appreciate the supposed good outcomes of such a good motive under normal circumstances, and thereby approve of the motive, even if the imagined good outcomes are not realized in the reality . A good motive with good resulting effects realized certainly strikes us more strongly, but when the good effects are not resulted, we tend to correct our sentiment because luck carries no moral value .…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume states that if you can explain the parts of something then you don’t need to explain the process as a whole or that there may not be a cause there for the process in total anyway. For example if there are twenty eggs, Hume states that you can explain the eggs individually and not need to explain the eggs as a whole. However there are flaws here that make Hume’s argument fall apart. The explaining of parts individually is not sufficient for example Hume would explain a chicken with an egg and an egg with a chicken. This presents the problem of circular logic in that we learn nothing of the process and instead have the infinite regression problem of the argument going back and forth between the two particulars. To have a satisfactory conclusion we need to explain the whole process.…

    • 437 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Hume, D. (2008). An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In J. Feinberg & R. Shafer-Landau, Reason and Understanding (pp. 237-263). Boston: Wadsworth.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chrysippus argued that the cause is action or event that results in another action or event. He also stated that the cause, as well as, the body is all existent. The event that results from the cause is non-existent instead, therefore, a predicate. The cause of an event is inferred as ‘because’ while that which it causes is inferred as ‘why’. The cause and effect, according to Chrysippus, are not only relative but also inseparable. Chrysippus provided a distinction between “auxiliary and proximate” causes and “perfect and principal” causes. He argues that antecedent causes, when they are auxiliary and proximate, render their effects necessary. Perfect and principal causes, when they are antecedent, render their effects necessary. On the other…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume¡¦s moral theory arose out of his belief that reason alone can never cause action. Hume proclaimed virtue is always accompanied by a feeling of pleasure and correspondingly vice by a bad feeling or pain. We are compelled to commit a virtuous action because it creates pleasant feelings and we avoid doing a vicious act because it would cause pain. This moral theory is, therefore, a virtue-centered morality rather than the natural-law morality, which saw morality as coming from God.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age of Reason

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thesis: To discuss the philosophers who participated and had an affect in The Age of Reason.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His education was through a faith based system that he knew that this information was impounded into his mind. So reasoning was out, he accepted the education he received but felt that learning from the world itself to obtain knowledge was far important. He know that we were all born with reasoning skills that will help us through our lives and education is the key factor becoming knowledgeable. Many faith based individual are not knowledgeable of their minds, they are too into the customs that they have been brought up. This is what shapes their so called reason even it disobeys the laws of nature. This is their capacity of reasoning and unfortunately people who have doubts are considered atheist. This is what Hume encountered in his time, being known as an atheist. Hume only wanted to determine an argument that was from centuries old known miracles, that it was the possibility of falsity of man’s testimonies. Humes Quote from section 2 “Nothing is so convenient as a decisive argument of this kind, which must at least silence the most arrogant bigotry and superstition, and free us from their impertinent solicitations. I flatter myself, that I have discovered an argument of a like nature, which, if just, will, with the wise and learned, be an everlasting check to all kinds of superstitious delusion”. As Hume provided with his views on miracles and not relying on testimonies. From…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why for Hume a true philosophy is true skepticism? Often, Hume is categorized as an atheist, but such categorization needs to be questioned, for Hume does not necessarily deny the existence of God, but rather he inquires about the true nature of God in Dialogues by presenting three characters with different philosophical positions. Hume's attempt to substantiate the rationality of religious belief, I argue, renders Hume's skeptical stance as an affirmation of the possibility for the existence of God. Hume argues in his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding that knowledge is established from experience (Hume, 545a).…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s main point in his article is his claim that a person consists of a collection of thoughts, memories, experience, and knowledge. He states that there is no existence of an individual self area of our being and we are instead just a “bundle” of psychological items. Hume is a type of skeptic as he believes that since we cannot internally or externally prove the existence of a soul or distinct self that it in fact does not exist.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume argued that conditions are based upon experience and they are always subject to change. And linking the fact to the science behind the secret nature of body which is learned from the past experience, changes subsequently without change in their sensible qualities. Foundations of substance are always established after the subject has been developed, not before the development. For example, science, after carrying out certain number of experiments, comes with a conclusion, which is established as the scientific truth. The future conditions/occurrences are imagined as well as believed to be based upon the summary of the science, which is…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although distinctions similar to Kant’s a priori–a posteriori distinction and his synthetic–analytic distinction have been made by thinkers such as Hume and Leibniz, Kant is the first to apply two such distinctions to generate a third category for knowledge. Hume, for instance, does not distinguish between what Kant calls the analytic and the a priori and what he calls the synthetic and the a posteriori, so that, for Hume, all synthetic judgments are necessarily a posteriori. Since only a priori truths have the important qualities of being universal and necessary, all general truths about reality—as opposed to particular observations about unconnected events—must be a priori. If our a priori knowledge is limited to definitional analytic judgments, then Hume is right in concluding that rationally justified knowledge of universal and necessary truths is impossible. Kant’s coup comes in determining that synthetic judgments can also be a priori. He shows that mathematics and scientific principles are neither analytic nor a posteriori, and he provides an explanation for the category of the synthetic a priori by arguing that our mental faculties shape our…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays