Preview

The Flaws of the Socratic Method

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Flaws of the Socratic Method
The Flaws of the Socratic Method
In Plato’s Republic, as well as in most of his other works, the philosopher writes dialogues between the character of his mentor, Socrates, and various figures meant to illustrate contradictory positions. He carefully scripts the engagements in a form of discussion now called the Socratic Method, where Socrates critiques the positions of the other characters in order to find flaws in inaccurate arguments. Although this method is prevalent even today, I will make the case that even when Plato himself is using it, the Socratic Method, while not without benefits, is an extremely flawed way of conducting educational discourse.
The Socratic Method is a dialectic method of argument, meaning that the participants are ideally emotionally detached from the sides which they’re arguing, and are approaching things solely with the intent of capturing the truth of the matter. In practice, the Method consists of someone taking a position and his opponent asking leading questions in order to ferret out the flaws in his opponents’ position. These questions often take the form of application of the relevant concept in an effort to find a plausible scenario or comparison in which the proposal is self-contradicting. When such a scenario is discovered, the argument can be discarded as inaccurate and a new, different position is put forth, which is similarly subject to deconstruction.
Plato applies the Socratic Method liberally and to a wide variety of subject matter. In Republic, he is concerned most with the nature of virtue and justice, the exploration of which is couched in the formulation of a flawless society. In Gorgias, his Socrates engages several political and religious figures on the merits of rhetoric versus his own method of discourse. He uses his style of argument to explore very fundamental and complex topics, and it allows him to make strides in clarifying and refuting many deeply seated assumptions contained in a variety of



Cited: "Avoidance Behaviour". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2014. Web. 05 Mar. 2014 Canney, Ryan Patrick. “The Dialectic Today.” Illinois State University. Web. Mar 15 2014. Chen, Alan, and Celia Taylor. "Criticisms of the Socratic Method." University of Denver: Law School Learning Aids. N.p.. Web. 5 Mar 2014. . Ford, Christopher. "The Socratic Method in the 21st Century." United States Military Academy. United States Military Academy, n.d. Web. 5 Mar 2014. . Ingersoll, Jenna. "The Failure of Socrates: Limitation or Defect?" Sewanee.edu. University of the South, n.d. Web. 5 Mar 2014. . Plato. Gorgias. Hackett Publishing Co., 1986. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical thinking in our book is described as a variety of deliberative processes that assist us in evaluating arguments and analyzing claims.…

    • 591 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    TTTC Notes

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The term “dialectic” means “the art or practice of arriving at the truth by using conversation involving question and answer.” The “dialectic” was the method Socrates used to teach his students how to be actively engaged in the struggle to derive meaning from an unfamiliar and challenging work.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One noticeable omission in the otherwise ever flourishing literature on Plato's Crito (and one might say on the early Platonic dialogues in general) is the recognition that Plato is presenting a problem from a virtue ethical angle. This is no doubt due to the fact that Aristotle, rather than Plato is regarded as the originator of Virtue Ethics as a branch of philosophy.1 Plato's own contribution to the discipline is more…

    • 5091 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived a life of inquiry in order to achieve a fulfilled life of eudaimonia and success. I argue that the Socratic examined life is a process, which should be valued because it teaches one to be critical thinkers, and aids us in the understanding our true actions.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of the dialectic method of reasoning is the resolution of an argument through rational discussion, and ultimately, the search for truth. Numerous techniques are applied. One way to proceed is the Socratic method that shows a given hypothesis leads to a self contradiction.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Socratic Method is a form of teaching or arguing that is executed by asking leading questions to someone rather than just stating a conclusion or opinion outright. The broad goal of the Socratic Method is to ultimately have the person who is being asked the questions personally figure out, disagree with, or agree with whatever it is that is being debated by themselves. Such a method, which is adopted by Socrates in The Republic, is essential in philosophy because it is the only way to acquire wisdom or insight-virtues that cannot be physically or verbally transferred to another-is from within. Socrates believes that people have the raw materials within to figure out philosophical questions; they just need to channel them. That idea is the basis behind his belief that a teacher should not merely insert knowledge into an empty mind, but rather help individuals harness the raw materials they already posses to find "truths" in life. According to Socrates the human mind, much like the varying definitions of justice, is overwhelmed with confusion and jumble.…

    • 979 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soratic Questioning Paper

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    she responded. “Everything in my life bad or good has always shone me a reason…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology by Plato

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For the majority of his life, Socrates spent a good deal of his time asking questions of the people of Athens. His goal was to arrive at a set of political and ethical truths. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know (Grube 26). The questions Socrates asked forced his audiences to think through a problem and arrive at a logical conclusion. At times, the answers seemed so obvious his opponents often looked foolish. His “Socratic Method” of questioning as it came to be called later, was adored by Socrates’ followers but despised by others throughout Athens (“Socrates Biography.”).…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanism In Greek Art

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pre-Socratics used rational thought to explain their world; if nature causes it, nature can cure it. They tried to explain natural occurrences without the use of religion. The Sophists suspected that Absolute Truths and Ideals are relative to the individual; they are not set by a higher power, but we decide them ourselves with our own human ideas and experiences. This idea seems to put a lot of power in our hands. Socrates, the father of philosophy, used the Socratic Method to teach; he asked questions, allowing students to use their own prior knowledge to form answers, looking within to find truth. His student Plato’s story, “The Cave,” emphasizes that humans may independently take the intellectual journey to enlightenment, reach the Realm of Perfect Forms, and discover truth for themselves. Both teacher and student insisted that Man himself had to reach truth, as it is not received from a higher…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I explicate connections between Socrates’ descriptions of himself and his role as a citizen and educator in his home city, Athens, as portrayed in Plato’s Apology. The Apology depicts the trial of Socrates, and its entirety is narrated from the point of view of Socrates. Therefore, in the account of this trial, we have a lens through which we can view Socrates’ ideologies and convictions. Additionally, because Socrates is speaking directly to a jury of five hundred and one Athenians, from this dialogue we can interpret how Socrates saw his life and purpose in relation to Athens and her people through his direct interaction with them.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates contends that the art of oratory reveals the weakness of democratic rule by which the best orator rather than the most knowledgeable can convince the masses without reason or logic. In his dialogue with Gorgias Socrates affirms this claim that a speaker “could…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spera

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In classical philosophy, dialectic is an exchange of propositions (theses) and counter-propositions (antitheses) resulting in a synthesis of the opposing assertions, or at least a qualitative transformation in the direction of the dialogue. It is one of the three original liberal arts (the other members are rhetoric and grammar) in Western culture. In ancient and medieval times, both rhetoric and dialectic were understood to aim at being persuasive (through dialogue). The aim of the dialectical method, often known as dialectic or dialectics, is to try to resolve the disagreement through rational discussion. One way — the Socratic Method — is to show that a given hypothesis (with other admissions) leads to a contradiction; thus, forcing the withdrawal of the hypothesis as a candidate for truth. Another way of trying to resolve a disagreement is by denying some presupposition of the contending thesis and antithesis; thereby moving to a third (syn) thesis.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nothing

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    when presenting information leads to more learning transfer. Importantly, it also focuses on cognitive load,…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato’s method of dialogue engaged in systematic, logical examination of all points of view… Plato’s idea was that the philosopher-king must be not only a thinker but also a doer.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays