Preview

The Creation Of The Free Soil Party

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
659 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Creation Of The Free Soil Party
The individual that I chose isn’t one person but a group of individuals who were disgruntle politician who were anti slavery supports known as The Free Soil Party. The party consisted of various parties including the Democrats, Whigs the liberty party and New York State anti-slavery group call Barnburner. The Free Soil Party was a short-lived political party in the United States active in the 1848 and 1852 presidential elections, and in some state elections. This Party was founded in Buffalo, New York it was a third party that largely appealed to and drew its great strength from New York State. The issue that I chose was The Wilmot Provision, which was an amendment that was attached to requests for funding from the government that prompted …show more content…
They wanted farm families to settle the western territories and install democratic republican values and institutions there. Motivating its members –mostly white yeomen farmers was their belief that slavery benefited “aristocratic men”. The Wilmot Proviso of 1846 was an event that prompted the creation of The Free Soil Party. The Wilmot Proviso was a bold attempt by opponents of slavery to prevent its introduction in the territories purchased from Mexico following the Mexico War. The Proviso never passed through Congress, but it did ignite an intense national debate over slavery that led to the creation of the antislavery Republican Party in 1854. The Mexican War was fueled by the desire to annex Texas. President Polk asked congress for 2 million to help negotiate peace and settle the boundary with Mexico. David Wilmot attached his proposal The Wilmot Proviso to President Polk’s funding measure, which would prohibit slavery in the new territories acquired from Mexico, including California. This injected the controversial slavery issue into the funding debate, the House approved the bill and sent it to the Senate for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Links connected the forecoming of Lincoln during the anitiwar Whig who aimed for free labor. He won the election by his famous slogan ‘’free soil, free labor, freeman’’. Abraham Lincoln was elected to be president in 1860 because of the division between the North and the South over the spread of slavery upon the new states and territories. The War with Mexico created the debate more dangerous, which Lincoln called for free labor. Mr.Lincolsn election was mostly from the political and ideological difference between the North and South over the extend of slavery in the new states and…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Free-Soil Party was created in 1848. It was formed for whites that opposed slavery expansion. Additionally, the supporters believed the desecration that black men and women could bring to the new western land. Furthermore, Many Free-Soil party supporters were hostile towards blacks. Yet, a few black and white abolitionists supported their movement because they thought it was away to fight slavery.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Polk died just three months after leaving office, Senator Lewis Cass of Michigan took his place. To maintain the one party unity on the issue of slavery, Cass proposed a new idea, squatter (popular) sovereignty. Under this concept, Congress would allow the settlers in each territory the right to determine their status as a free or slave territory. Sadly, Cass’s plan of squatter sovereignty failed to persuade the northern democrats because they joined the Free-Soil Party which prohibited the expansion of slavery in the western territories. Squatter (popular) sovereignty was important because without it, the rights and liberties of the citizens in the US wouldn’t be fully protected by federal measures.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Essay

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    - Polk describes his perspective on the war with Mexico he explains that he originally tried to negotiate peacefully with Mexico by sending in various people to negotiate with the Mexican government and governor such as Mr. Slidell. But the Mexican government never negotiated with the USA delegates send to the Mexico.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the 1760s to the 1860s opposition to slavery grew and morphed, culminating in the outbreak of the American Civil War. The writing of the Three-Fifths Clause, in 1787 (Source 1) reveals how, from the birth of the Union, the issue of slavery forced sides to come to uneasy compromises. Slavery at this time was purely a political and economic issue. Throughout the 100 years however, the opposition to slavery evolved. The formation the single issue party, The Free Soil party, in 1848, symbolised a shift towards a moral opposition to slavery. Although the Free Soil Party had an economic incentive to push for the abolition of slavery, they also argued that free men on free soil offered a morally superior system to slavery. Magee depicts the multifaceted…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Wilmot Proviso was an amendment proposed, by democrat David Wilmot, to the bill for peace with Mexico in 1846. The amendment stated that all land attained in the treaty with Mexico would be slave free. This proposed amendment would be a debated for years and set out a pressing issue dealing with westward expansion. Southerners thought it was unfair because, “all Americans should have equal rights, including the right to move their property.” Polk tried to compromise by suggesting that we expand the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific Ocean, with the same rules no slavery in the north of the line and slavery would be allowed south of the line. Another idea that came into play, because of this issue was, “popular sovereignty,” each territory had the right to choose for themselves and with their own representative whether or not they would be free or slave territories. In the election of 1848 both parties tried to avoid this issue as much as possible and a new party formed. They new party opposed slavery as the Free-Soil Party, their candidate was Martin Van Buren. The Free-Soil Party supported the Wilmot Proviso. Although they did not win the election it was an important event in American politics and it showed the lack of capability the current parties had to please the people on the issues. This led to the fall of the second party system.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo cede territory north of the Rio Grande, California, and New Mexico. In addition, assume financial responsibility for its new citizens (if they had any claims with Mexico), and paid Mexico $15 million. The expansion of the United States territory led to the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Never boring: simple words that describe the simple life of one of the greatest American Heroes of all time. Over the years we have come to understand the Great Emancipator’s struggles and his determination to push for a better future for his nation. In the blink of war, Lincoln came to the nation’s rescue. But was Lincoln really the Great Emancipator? Was Lincoln actually opposed to the slavery movement? Or did he not consider the blacks to be an equal race? Did he make an active effort to free the slaves? Or was the emancipation a never Lincoln’s priority? In my opinion, although freeing the slaves was never Lincoln’s top priority during his tenure as president, Lincoln was sympathetic towards them. His main issue was the war and the probability of the union getting split into two. I believe that Lincoln may not have always seen the black race as equals and that the emancipation came about as a by-product of the Union getting saved.…

    • 2916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Knox Polk Dbq

    • 2332 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This created a hot debate over the war itself and the spread of slavery. In 1846 a congressman introduced an amendment to a spending bill, Wilmot Proviso. The bill asserted that slavery wouldn’t be allowed to exist in the territory acquired from Mexico (Dusinberre 148). Polk found the entire bill to be “foolish and mischievous”, believing that there was no connection between peace with Mexico and slavery (Nevins 138). Polk claimed to have no interest in extending slavery but it was noted that he was an avid slave owner and many even considered racist. He even bought and sold slaves while in the White House and took measures to keep it a secret (Nevins…

    • 2332 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World History Study Guide

    • 2705 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Wilmot proviso - one of the major events leading to the American Civil War, would have banned slavery in any territory to be acquired from Mexico in the Mexican War or in the future, including the area later known as the Mexican Cession, but which some proponents construed to also include the disputed lands in south Texas and New Mexico east of the Rio Grande.…

    • 2705 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, Polk's accused Mexico of insults and lack of payments. The message was sent to the congress on May 11, and approved the next day. The unjust war of conquest had begun. The Mexican government understood perfectly the impossibility of…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the ironies of the Civil War era and the end of slavery in the United States has always been that the man who played the role of the Great Emancipator was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. Abraham Lincoln, whatever his larger reputation as the liberator of two million black slaves, has never entirely shaken off the imputation that he was something of a half-heart about it. "There is a counter-legend of Lincoln," acknowledges historian Stephen B. Oates, "one shared ironically enough by many white southerners and certain black Americans of our time" who are convinced that Lincoln never intended to abolish slavery--that he "was a bigot...a white racist who championed segregation, opposed civil and political rights for black people" and "wanted them all thrown out of the country." That reputation is still linked to the 19th-century denunciations of Lincoln issued by the abolitionist vanguard.…

    • 5760 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people during this time thought that slavery should be abolished. However, just because these individuals thought slavery should be done away with does not mean that every one of them actually voiced their concerns and stood up for the slaves. For example, George Washington was a slave owner himself, but after fighting a huge battle for his own independence he soon began rethinking being a slave owner. Washington never voiced his opinion on slavery, but freed every one of his slaves in his will. Many people thought that slavery should be abolished because of the way that it violated the slave’s human rights and gave the so called masters total control and the ability to dictate. Phyllis Wheatley was one of the many people that fought for the enslaved African American. Phyllis was a writer who wrote and spoke about the injustice of slavery. James Otis was a white colonist that believed slavery was “a huge violation of the law of nature.” John Allen shares the same beliefs as Otis and did all that he could to let his voice be heard and free slaves.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays