Preview

The Free Soil Party's Opposition To Slavery From 1860 To 1860

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Free Soil Party's Opposition To Slavery From 1860 To 1860
From the 1760s to the 1860s opposition to slavery grew and morphed, culminating in the outbreak of the American Civil War. The writing of the Three-Fifths Clause, in 1787 (Source 1) reveals how, from the birth of the Union, the issue of slavery forced sides to come to uneasy compromises. Slavery at this time was purely a political and economic issue. Throughout the 100 years however, the opposition to slavery evolved. The formation the single issue party, The Free Soil party, in 1848, symbolised a shift towards a moral opposition to slavery. Although the Free Soil Party had an economic incentive to push for the abolition of slavery, they also argued that free men on free soil offered a morally superior system to slavery. Magee depicts the multifaceted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Slavery, by Stanley Elkins, is a text that does its best to analyze the institution of Slavery from all angles in a more analytical, rather than purely emotional, manner. It also proves that the topic, which many believed was decided upon and done with at the end of the Civil War, was still as powerful and controversial in the 20th Century as ever. Elkins approached the topic from several viewpoints, including anthropological, sociological and psychological, even starting the text by examining the works of many “experts” in the field who attempted to analyze it after the end of the Civil War.Though originally published in 1958, the analyses within hold up as well today as they did then, and the additions of even more analyses in the second and third editions give even more insights on how historians are still focusing on this area of American history.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American Anti-Slavery Society was an abolitionist group that fought to end slavery in America. The Society was started in 1833 by William Lloyd Garrison. This took place two years after the Nat Turner Slave Rebellion and Southerners wanted to increase restrictions on slavery. The Society was a response to the increased restrictions. The society grew to around 250,000 members and had over 1000 local charters. Members included people like Susan B. Anthony and Fredrick Douglas. The south was not happy with the growth of the society because they feared it foreshadowed Congress ending slavery. In 1839, the society spilt into two groups, one radical, anti-organized religious, and feminist and the other group was conservative, religious, and anti-feminist.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Anti-Slavery Society, what used to be the AASG charged William Lloyd Garrison with writing the organization's new declaration. The document condemns the institution of slavery and accuses slave owners of the sin of being a "man-stealer". It calls for the immediate abolition of slavery without terms, and is critical of the efforts of the American Colonization Society. At the same time, it declares the group to be pacifist, and the signers agree, if necessary, to die as martyrs. The black clergyman Theodore S. Wright was a significant founding member and served on the executive committee until 1840.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Controversy arouse in from the years 1793 to 1860 on a wide scale of topics regarding the Slavery as well as North and South arguments lead to impact America throughout these years. Controversy and discussion, even war, were brought about with how the topics such as how cotton developed the “Cotton Kingdom”, the aristocrats of the south, slavery and its systems, how slaves were treated, abolitionism, and the effects of antislavery on the North and South were handled. All of the topics discussed are vital parts that helped to lead the United States into Civil War in 1861.…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was steadily growing. However the reasons for this growth are debated among historians' as to…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With drama now rumbling in the American underbellies, the small weight of anything slightly bad could set off a secession bomb. A freesoiler does not want to spread slavery, but he is okay with keeping it in a state it is already in. When the idea of popular sovereignty came about with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A), those freesoilers in office were pushed harder…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Reagan once said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the blood stream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” Reflecting on Ronald Reagan’s quote of freedom and Slavery one might wonder how all of England’s North American colonies allowed slavery till the late 1700’s. Researching the southern middle and New England colonies one can identify the similarities and differences within the justification of slavery, types of slavery within the colonies, and the treatments of the different slaves. Considering all of the elements of why slavery was allowed before the 1700’s understanding the similarities and differences between the different colonies had more slaves than others.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Abolitionist Movement involved both White and African American people, free or slave, male or female, famous or not famous, all of them contributed to the movement to eradicate slavery. Back in 1873, the American Anti - Slavery Society found 29 anti - slavery societies in Connecticut alone. To reach their goal of abolishing slavery, they had employed several methods including colonization schemes, legal or political actions, expressing slavery as a sin and “Moral Suasion” (Appealing to the ethic principles of the public to convince them that slavery was bad and wrong). They also used several “Weapons” such as anti - slavery publications, conferences, public speech, purchases, legal challenges and petitions to the General Assembly and the…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery took a hard hit in the 1830’s as Abolitionists began to harshly criticize the institution of slavery. There was also a few slave rebellions that ultimately failed that scared slave owners and other southerners. To combat this rough criticism and rebellion southern evangelicals interpreted the Bible as being literal and began to use certain verses to support slavery. “They pointed out, for example, that the patriarchs of Israel had owned slaves. Slavery had been practiced throughout the Roman world at the time of Christ, they noted, and the apostles had urged obedience to all secular laws, including those governing slavery.” (The American Journey Ch.11 Pg. 301) Ironically Northern evangelicals used the Bible to argue that slavery was…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    why the war came

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the TerritorieLincoln Reconsidered: Essays on the Civil War Era: David Herbert ...…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secession Dbq

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800s, slavery was a very important talked about subject matter in politics, economics, and culture. It was such an important aspect of the time period that it was on everyone’s mind, and everyone had an opinion on it. This tore the country in half, and forced the South into secession. Many people wonder if this was legal, but due to the fact that the North had also broken laws and that the lawbook was in their favor, the South was entitled to secession.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. finally claimed more land after the Mexican War, the Southern and Northern States slowly began to move farther apart. Even though Northern congressmen supported the Wilmot Proviso, which banned slavery in all new Western territories, the Southern congressmen completely disagreed and went against it. The Compromise of 1850 was set to hopefully smooth these disputes over by supporting the idea of popular sovereignty, western lands having the right to determine by themselves whether they would be free or slave states. The Free-Soil Party also had a big impact. They opposed slavery’s expansion in the Western territories in the late 1840s and early 1850s.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1800’s there was much turmoil over the debate of slavery and whether it was inhumane or not. Slavery caused the nation to separate into 2 factions; the north, who believe in abolishing slavery and the south who thought that slavery was a “benign institution” as quoted by Ulrich B. Phillips. There is much debate whether slavery was the prominent cause of the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, slavery was not the ultimate cause of the Civil War; in fact the economic, cultural, and political differences between the North and South played more prominent roles in the instigation of the Civil War and influenced the beginnings of slavery.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fugitive Slave Acts

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By the middle of the nineteenth century, the issue of slavery had caused a deep division between North and South. Slavery was an important part of the Southern way of life, and slave labor was a major aspect of the Southern states' economy. Northerners opposed slavery yet were concerned that the political, economic, and conflict with the South over slavery could threaten a civil war between the two sides. The conflict intensified over the issue of fugitive, or escaped, slaves. Because slaves were treated as property in the South, slave owners felt it was their right to seek out and recapture slaves who had escaped to free Northern states. Northerners tended to view this practice as kidnapping. Many wondered if officials in the free states had a right not to interfere with the slave owner or in fact had the power to declare the slave a free person. Article 4, section 2 of the Constitution stated that slaves who escaped to free states had to be surrendered to their owners upon demand. Although the Constitution recognized the institution of slavery and the rights of slave owners, it was still unclear just what the law required of the people and officials in free states in regard to the matter of fugitive slaves. In other words, enforcement of the Constitution on this matter was a gray area decades before the Civil War.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1787, at the time of the Constitutional Convention, slavery in the United States was a harsh reality. The census of 1790 counted slaves in nearly every state, the only exceptions being Massachusetts and the "districts" of Vermont and Maine. In the entire country 3.8 million people were counted; 700,000 of them, or 18 percent, were slaves. These statistics are a striking example of the prominence of slavery in the history of the United States. They also exemplify the obvious contradiction between the institution of slavery and the advocacy of equality presented by the framers of our Constitution. Despite the freedoms reserved in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, slavery was not only tolerated, it was regulated.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays