The Cosmological Argumentative Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.
Rowe suggests that premise 2 “seems to be a necessary truth.” But it certainly is not if we take Clarke’s analysis of premise 1. If a living thing exists and it is not the case that something has always existed, then it does conclude that something has been produced out of nothing.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful