Preview

Key Features of the Cosmological Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Key Features of the Cosmological Argument
Examine the key ideas of the cosmological argument.

The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God on the basis that the universe has not always been in existence and so for it to be created, an external cause was necessary; this outside agent is viewed as God. It creates à posteriori knowledge which provides inductive explanations and makes conclusions on ideas based on actual experiences. It is a non-propositional argument so it cannot be proven but can be argued by offering experience as support.

Although the cosmological argument was expressed by Aquinas it was originally introduced and influenced by Aristotle. Aristotle stated ‘the series must start with something since nothing can come from nothing’. This suggests that Aristotle believed that the creation of universe is dependent on a supreme, ultimate primary mover, and is therefore an ‘unmoved mover’. Overall it is the vital cause of the creation of the universe, and is identified in Christianity as God. Aristotle persuaded this using the idea of planet motion which he highlighted as the cause of the change of seasons. For this transformation to happen, it required an ‘unmoved mover’ who would be capable of upholding order of the universe during the alterations. Aquinas used this concept as the labour of God.

Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.

Aquinas proposed the way of motion through the idea that in the world some things are in motion and whatever is moved is moved by another. He argued that it is impossible for something to be both mover and moved. Motion is therefore a change of state and is not just movement in time and space from one place to another. But motion requires an explanation since nothing can be in both potentiality and actuality in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People use the Cosmological argument to claim that this uncaused cause has to be God and there is no other explanation that could change that the initial cause of the universe is God. According to William L. Rowe in “The Cosmological Argument”, the cosmological argument has several key elements that make the argument into one that is to be taken into…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russell and Copleston

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before Copleston gets going with the Cosmological Argument, he uses two other arguments to suggest the existence of God in his introduction. These are:…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He examined that everything that exists was in a permanent state of 'movement' or 'motion'. By 'motion' Aristotle was linking it to the Greek word 'motus' which refers to change. He noticed that everything in the universe is in a state of change, for example, the weather and seasons are always changing. Even the human body is going through the process of change every single day. Everyday the body changes, we grow old and age, we lose hair and skin cells.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas proposed the way of motion through the idea that in the world some things are in motion and whatever is moved is moved by another. He argued that it is impossible for something to be both mover and moved. Motion is therefore a change of state and is not just movement in time and space from one place to another.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas's argument for the existence of God is a deductive argument. This assessment is based on the nature of the premises in the argument. As discussed during classroom lectures, the argument's premises and conclusion can be translated as evaluate the truth value of the premises and how they support the conclusion.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the cosmological argument is a strong argument for the theory that the universe it is a weak argument for the existence of the classical theological God.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Teleological Essay Philos

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What are the main strengths and weaknesses of the teleological argument for the existence of God?…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cosmological argument and the Experiential argument, I believe, are the most compelling evidence that God exists. The idea that something that begins must have a beginner or creator. That creator would have to be something that never begins. Saying that something that begins is not created from something is difficult to hold true. It may hold true if all the universe was just physical. Which would indicate that God would have to be physical and thus must have begun. But since God is spiritual then that would not work. The experiential argument is also a compelling argument because it shows people's experiences and the results are better people. Showing the causes is good because the end result is…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument for design has evolved over time as both theologians and philosophers have needed to adjust their arguments supporting this theory to address an ever changing landscape of scientific, biological and cosmological discovery. Despite this the essence of the argument remains intact those in support of the theory would argue that our existence on this earth and in this universe is far too complex a chain of events to have happened by chance. That in fact the existence of the universe is itself the result of a set of such improbable circumstances that there has to be intelligence behind its creation an architect, a creator or in religious terms a God (Chappell, 2011, p. 55). The versions of this argument are in my opinion interesting…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The religious belief of the creation of the universe is based on the notion that God created everything including the universe. Aquinas presents an argument to support the religious belief. The Cosmological Argument presented by Aquinas for the existence of god is quite simple; the basic idea is that everything in the natural world has a prior cause. Since the chain of causes can not go back to infinity, there must be a first cause. The first cause has to be self occurring in order for the chain to commence. Since nothing in the natural world is self-occurring, the first cause has to be super natural. Hence the supernatural cause/being is God.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first argument was based on motion, he did not believe in movement only from one place to another, but also in the movement of change of quality or quantity. Aquinas argued that everything is in motion, and for something to be in motion something must have been put in motion by some sort of object or force. He believed that the process of moving and being moved cannot be infinite. Therefore there must be a first mover or prime mover that itself is unmoved, this mover must be outside the universe. This mover is God.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This can be, and often is, used as evidence against the cosmological argument, but many cosmologists continue to believe it can work alongside God being the creator of the universe. Some people postulate that the Big Bang happened randomly, and does not need a cause – instead, it was itself the cause of the universe (however, this argument can potentially lead to design rather than causation). This reasoning, in my opinion, is very logical; there is no logical reason for God to necessarily be the ‘necessary being’ – it could, in fact, be the universe itself, as Hume stated. People who argue for the existence of God based on causation believe that the Big Bang must have had divine causes, and, although the Big Bang may have been the physical beginning of the universe, God is the being that started it off.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The cosmological arguments are one of the most important arguments for the existence of God, this argument is the most used around the world. For example, the existence of God and the beginning of the universe. The arguments states that everything on the earth had to have a beginning of existence and it could not be because it just appears on the earth something had to have created it, something…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, Aquinas concludes that common sense observation tells us that no object can create itself. In other words, some previous object creates it, but there cannot be an endless string of objects causing other objects to exist. Aquinas believes that ultimately there must have been an uncaused first cause that begins the chain of existence for all things. I quite assent to the idea that there must have a first unmoved mover to put the universe into motion. As we all know, everything has a beginning and an end, so as to the universe. That “Prime Mover” must exist to start the motion of the universe. Moreover, most supporters of the cosmological argument say that the universe could only have come into existence if it was caused by an unmoved cause. The unmoved mover is a philosophical concept described by Aristotle before Aquinas as the first…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays