Preview

Tang China Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
376 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tang China Case Study
The Roman or Chinese Method in Governing?
Tang Dynasty of China Empire and the Byzantine Empire existed on a similar large scale in the same period. (143 HSW) The territory of Tang Dynasty China expands even larger than the previous dynasty after Taizong Tang gaining territory from the Turks. (189 HSW) Tang China Empire stretched further based on the Han Dynasty’s territory which reaches Korea in the east, Taklamakan Desert in the west, Gobi in the north and Vietnam in the south. (177 HSW) The Byzantine Empire reached Mesopotamia in the east, Visigothic Kingdom (Spain) in the west, Danube River in the North, Egypt in the South. (HSW 204) How did the governments manage and control such immense territory and large population within their frontiers?
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyze the similarites and differences in methods of political control in Han China and imperial rome in the classical period. Essay Example
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze the similarites and differences in methods of political control in Han China and imperial rome in the classical period. Essay Example

    During the late classical period from 206 B.C.E to 476 C.E., the Roman Empire controlled the Mediterranean world and the Han Dynasty stretched from the Yellow River to the South China Sea. Although the Romans and Han empires used powerful militaries and infrastructure to control the peasants and fend off invasions, they differed in the structure and organization of their bureaucracies and the control that the emperors had over the governors of the provinces.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Han China vs. Imperial Rome Essay Example
    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han China vs. Imperial Rome Essay Example

    Han China chose the middle path between the two diverse methods of government and pursued the policies of administrative centralization and imperial expansion. In contrast, Imperial Rome centralized political and military power which coincided with the preservation of traditional republican offices and form of government. The Han government believed that the network of political alliances in the Zhou Dynasty caused chaos between states, but the tightly woven Qin dynasty diminished the reason for imperial family members the sustain the empire. Han China was preferably divided into administrative districts that were governed by officials. These officials reached the emperor’s expectations, but allowed his authority over them while the bureaucrats implied his policies. Although, original forms of governing were adjusted in both places; the military responded directly to the emperor or ruler to avoid the problems caused by generals commanding personal armies. Imperial Rome progressed, from a previous dictatorship, by fashioning a centralized political government and unifying military power. Imperial Rome, in comparison to Han china, handled governmental functions with more concern. The Roman Emperor accrued copious amounts of power for himself and took complete responsibility during these times.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Are The Similarities Between European Rome And Han China
    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Are The Similarities Between European Rome And Han China

    For the differences, Rome was followed up by another great civilization; the Byzantine Empire, while Han China was divided up into separate states after the empire fell. Rome managed to conquer regions…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences And Similarities Between Han Dynasty And Roman Empires
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences And Similarities Between Han Dynasty And Roman Empires

    These two giant empires were able to reach great heights, but they differed in origin. The Han Dynasty was created when Liu Bang pulled the state back together after the near collapse of the Qin dynasty. (Dunn and Mitchell 202) Rome had a much more humble beginning. “When Rome emerged as a republican city-state in late sixth century B.C.E., the peoples of Italy were mostly farmers.”(Dunn and Mitchell 193) These contrasting origins forced these empires to use different methods to maintain their rule.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Sui And Tang Empires
    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Sui And Tang Empires

    * The later years of the Tang Empire saw increasing turmoil as a result of conflict with Tibetans and Turkic Uighurs.…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparative: Roman and Chinese Empires
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparative: Roman and Chinese Empires

    No matter where an empire is located, maintaining a vast empire always comes with many hardships, and the Roman and Chinese Empires were no exception. In the time of city-states, the Romans had developed a Republican form of government, which successfully met its needs. However, the Romans failed to develop a new form of government that catered to the demands of an expanding empire, resulting in the fall of the Republic, and Roman emperors were never able to develop an effective ideology of rule. Coupled with armies' loyalties to generals rather than the state, the empire was prone to bloody civil wars and frequent change in rulers who only reigned for several months or years. Also, the empire's obsession with expanding and protecting its borders also led to an increased demand for military service, after which many small farmers had no work, leading to growing populations stuck in poverty and prone to riots. Furthermore, these small farms, which used to produce grain, were replaced, and the empire had to rely on imported grain for sustenance. These events led to the third century crisis, in which the Roman Empire faced a period in which political, military, and economic problems nearly destroyed the empire. China, despite being located in a different hemisphere, faced incredibly similar problems. Both the Roman and Chinese Empires had significant political and social turmoil due to conflicts between independent regions over power. Because it was impossible to communicate any faster than the speed of a horse, empires relied on autonomous local leaders to maintain control. However, many local leaders and military generals being more interested in their own political power, which led to internal conflicts and civil wars. The expanding borders also required greater protection, and both of the administrative centers of these empires were located far from its long borders. In order to maintain and protect its borders, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome
    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Comparative Analysis
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ap World History Comparative Analysis

    The first reason that the Roman Empire and the Han were so powerful is because both had strong central governments. While they were able to do this, each had varying methods of…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han
    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roman Vs Han

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty are some of the earliest empires that existed. They both lasted around four hundred years (Roman Empire lasted from around 37 B.C.- 476 A.D. and the Han Dynasty lasted from around 206 B.C.-220 A.D.). During this time these civilizations were the most powerful in the world. At their height, these empires had populations of around fifty million people, and they both covered approximately two million square miles. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both sought to protect their trade routes (the Roman Empire had the Mediterranean and the Han Dynasty had the Silk Road). They protected their trade routes by expanding their empires into these territories. Both empires had economies based off of agriculture, so for them the more land they owned the wealthier the empire was. These empires also developed an infrastructure to make communication, access to resources, and movement of military much easier. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both involved in economic activities that were designed to ensure a stable social and political order, and they used bureaucracy and taxation to provision major cities. Both were patriarchal societies where the father of the family had the most power.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Techniques of Administration in Classical Empires
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Techniques of Administration in Classical Empires

    The Persians and Greeks heavily influenced the Romans in their management of imperial administration. During the Qin dynasty, ideas and attributes of those empires may have diffused to the Han dynasty. Like Persia and the Qin dynasty, Imperial Rome and Han dynasty both had standardized currency, weights, measurements, and system of centralized government with a strong ruler. The emperor was the central authority with definite powers. In imperial Rome, Augustus reorganized the military system and created a new standing army with commanders who owed allegiance directly to the emperor and integrated them in the government. Similarly in Han China, the emperor positioned the Grand Commandant, was the irregularly posted commander of the military and then regent during the Western Han period. He owed direct allegiance to the emperor of Han. The government system of both empires was the central government with smaller regional…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Han and Rome Comparitive Essay
    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Han and Rome Comparitive Essay

    Both imperial Rome and Han China had a complex political system which was called a bureaucracy in which they established long periods of peace and prosperity within their empires. The Roman government leadership type was a strange mixture of democracy and the roman republic; in which the true power was held, having the wealthiest people appointed to the Roman senate and Roman republic. In contrast the Han dynasty was a monarchy in which the eldest male within the royal family was appointed emperor upon the decline of the current emperor succeeding him, keeping power confined in the blood lines. Both empires reached immense status of power both differently such as the Han dynasty being more unified, centralized and the emperor ruled following the mandate of heaven. Meanwhile the Romans where more of a republican city state which the emperor had limited power due to the fact that he had to pay homage to traditions.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tang Dynasty Essay
    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tang Dynasty Essay

    The ways in which Chinese society and government evolved and changed over the centuries as power shifted from each dynasty studied varies. First, the Tang Dynasty was the golden age of Chinese civilization with women in power. Second, the Song Dynasty was when China was reunified. For infrastructure and technology, both dynasties come together. Such as, canals and waterways allowed for trade to grow in China and beyond. The mechanical clock developed during this time. Gunpowder was also developed in this time and provided a new weapon source. Also, block printing and moveable type were developed. Along with the infrastructure and technology going together with both dynasties, population growth and agricultural productivity did as well. So,…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Tang Dynasty Analysis
    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tang Dynasty Analysis

    The Tang dynasty is one of the most spectacular dynasties of Imperial China. It saw its founding in 618 by the Li family and knew, thereafter a majestic expansion and an extremely diverse growth and development for almost the rest 200 years. From these developments, the abundance of poetry is particularly distinguishable, as it was an era of intellectual, artistic and literal productivity. Since poetry occupied a paramount position, it was also a reflection of the singular conditions of the Dynasty, the way people lived during that period of time, and most of all the way of thinking and their ideologies philosophies and doctrines. Therefore, those poems highlights the essence of Confucianism and Daoism, two major schools…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rough Draft Intro Paragraph Achaemenid vs Han
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rough Draft Intro Paragraph Achaemenid vs Han

    Under Darius’ rule, the Achaemenid Empire, the largest empire of its time, depended on a balance between central initiative and local administration. Divided into twenty three satrapies spread over thousands of miles, Achaemenid rulers needed methods to discourage local groups from becoming independent and seceding from the empire. Military forces and tax collectors were used to check the power and independence of the satraps who governed each territory. Spies, “the eyes and ears of the king,” were also dispersed throughout the empire to gather and report information. These methods helped Achaemenid rulers keep the empire under control and unified. Lastly, Cyrus and Darius, but not Xerxes, valued the culture and beliefs of the people they ruled. This reduced the chances of people rebelling because they are forced to live following a certain religion. The government also worked on building roads to facilitate trade and communication. The Han dynasty of China primarily used a centralized government. The empire was administered by an enormous bureaucracy, which needed a steady supply of educated candidates. The Imperial University was established to educate students so they will be prepared to government service. Roads were also built during the Han dynasty to assist trade and communication. Both the Achaemenid Empire and the Han dynasty had vast empires to control. While the Achaemenid Empire divided its land with governors for each area, the Han dynasty depended on a bureaucracy to maintain control. The Achaemenid Empire relied on military forces, tax collectors, and spies to maintain the effectiveness of their system of satapies. The Han dynasty relied on a continuous supply of educated officials to become part of its bureaucracy. Both dynasties built roads to help with expansion and to help regulate and expedite trade and…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Han China vs. Mauryan/Gupta India
    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Han China vs. Mauryan/Gupta India

    Analyze similarities and differences in methods of political control in the following empires in the classical period.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics