Preview

Supreme Court Case: The People Vs. Rodrigo Caballero

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
906 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Case: The People Vs. Rodrigo Caballero
C

Supreme Court Case
Bobby Blankenship
CJA/354
July 15th, 2013
P.M. Pollock

Supreme Court Case
Have you ever wondered if there is such a thing as to serious a judgment on a criminal case? In this paper I am bringing to light the case of The People VS. Rodrigo Caballero. In this case Caballero shot at a rival gang, in which he injured one individual. While being charged with three counts of willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder he was given a sentence of 110 years to life. While his crime is a serious offense, was the sentence given just?
What Makes This Case Interesting
This case is interesting because a juvenile was sentenced to 110 years to life without parole which violates the Eight Amendment. The Eight Amendment
…show more content…
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution asserts that “This Constitution … shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” Statutes and ordinances are laws passed by Congress and by state legislatures that make up most of criminal law. Each state has a statutory criminal code as does the federal government.
Appellate court decisions are legal opinions having the status of law as stated by the appellate courts become case law. Such law results from appellate court interpretations of statutory law or from court decisions where rules have not yet been codified in statutes. The purposes of criminal law that relates to this case are: to deter people from criminal activity and to stipulate the degree of seriousness of criminal conduct. The sentencing that was cast from the judge in this case seems aimed more to deter other juveniles from possibly committing the same
…show more content…
An accomplice is often present or directly aids in the commission of the crime. The principle of accomplice liability is based on the notion that any individual who aids, abets, encourages, or assists another person to commit a crime should share in the criminal liability that accrues under law. “Criminal liability is the legal responsibility for a crime against the state, making the perpetrator subject to prosecution in a court of law and punishment (wiseGeek, 2003-2013).”
Accomplice liability in this case would be the gang that Rodrigo Caballero is a member of. They assisted in the crime by driving Caballero to the scene where the rival gang members were. Criminal liability in this case would be Caballero. He committed the crime of willful, deliberate, and premeditated attempted murder which makes him legally responsible for the crime. Since he is legally responsible for this crime, Caballero was prosecuted and punished for his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the People v. Caballero case, the 8th amendment was being denied when 16 year old Graham was served with “…a minimum of 110 years before becoming parole eligible” (People v. Caballero). Terrance Graham’s VIII amendment was violated, he was given a cruel and unusual punishment of a 110 year sentence, and only after that would he be eligible for parole. Graham was a 16 year old boy who was committed for armed burglary and attempted armed robbery, and was sentenced to probation. However, his probation was revoked and was sentenced to life in prison for burglary: “…leaving Graham with no possibility of release unless he was granted executive clemency” (PJDC). The number of given years is cruel because it falls out of a human’s natural life…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Criminal law is very important to the criminal justice system. Criminal law states what behavior is criminal and it gives the punishment for each crime. In this document the sources and purposes of criminal law will be discussed. The jurisdiction information will be explained in order to show how it determines where the laws are enforced and created. The differences in the adversarial system and standard of proof within criminal cases will be explored. The differences between criminal liability and accomplice liability will be evaluated. The definitions of inchoate offenses for example, solicitation, conspiracy and contempt will be determined. Also, these terms will be compared to elements of additional criminal offenses.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently, the United States Supreme Court has decided to hear a Florida case, Sullivan v. State, 987 So.2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), where a minor received a life without parole sentence in a conviction for rape.3 This note will analyze the Sullivan case and predict how the Court will likely rule. There are two dimensions that this note will discuss: First, the Eighth Amendment jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court regarding proportionality in sentencing. And second, the Court’s treatment of minors under the Eight Amendment’s “cruel and unusual” clause.…

    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lit1 Task 1

    • 1519 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Liability - The liability is shared by all partners. If one partner does something negligent, all partners can be held liable.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice has been a prominent controversy in present day society. We can observe how the majority of crimes committed are being perpetrated by adolescents. The disputation arises on whether the Supreme Court justice should abolish mandatory life in prison for pubescents who commit the immorality of murder or authorize the punishment with parole. Although many can challenge this contrary issue, I concur with ideology of the Supreme Court ruling that juveniles who engage in murder could not be sentenced to life in prison due to the protection the 8th amendment granting defense from cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller vs Alabama

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The judgment of the court is mainly based on consolidation of two cases. In Jackson vs. Hobbs, Jackson was at the age of fourteen when he and other two youth went to a store in Arkansas planning to steal from it. In this case, Jackson got charged as an adult and given a life term with no parole. In Miller v. Alabama, Miller was a fourteen year of age. Jackson and another boy set fire to a trailer where they had purchased drugs. Miller was convicted of murder and given a mandatory life sentence with no parole. The decision was reversed by the Supreme Court. The review of the above cases was approved by the Supreme Court presenting the subject of constitutionality of a life sentence without parole for fourteen year olds who committed murder crimes. The two cases follow two previous cases before the Supreme Court. In the case of Roper v. Simmons, it was held that imposition of death penalty on defendants below the age of eighteen violated the eighth amendment. In the case of Graham v Florida, it was held sentencing…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation – Causation is the direct link between the act of the defendant and the outcome of the crime. Causation is the finding out of what caused the outcome of the crime.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Causation: Having been part of negligent activity, however not legally responsible under the law…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evan Miller Court Case

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miller argued that this decision violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment and was cruel and unusual punishment but the final decision did not change. Miller also argued that his sentenced should not have been the same as an adult’s because a 14 year old boy’s undeveloped brain did not allow him to have much control over his behavior. I agree with Miller because I believe that a 14 year old is unable to really understand the consequences of his decisions. When Miller went to his neighbor’s trailer the first time he was looking for drugs, I believe that the environment he was living in should have been taken into consideration when he went on trial. Therefore, in my opinion sentencing a 14 year old to life in prison without parole is cruel and unusual punishment and does violate the Eight and Fourteenth…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An accomplice is a person who helps another to commit a crime, it is also known as “accessories”. These secondary parties participate in the commission of an offence and they will be liable if it was proved that they aided, abetted, counselled, or prosecuted. For example, A encourages D to hit V by a car and kill him, B brings the car to D, and C clears the road making sure no one is watching. If an accused was charged as an accessory they would be charged either with aiding, abetting, counseling or procuring and they are the four types of participating in a crime.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under the eyes of the federal government this person still judge as conspirator, better more if this person know about the plan of the crime and does not communicate to the authorities. This person definitely is conspirator.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Accomplice

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    In the basic sense Accomplice Witness mean a witness to a crime who, either as principal, Accomplice, or Accessory, was connected with the crime by unlawful act or omission on his or her part, transpiring either before, at time of, or after commission of the offense, and whether or not he or she was present and participated in the crime . The word ‘accomplice’ has not been defined by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. An accomplice is one of the guilty associates or partners in the commission of a crime or who in some way or the other is connected with the commission of crime or who admits that he has a conscious hand in the commission of crime .…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a problem is encountered where there are several participants in the crime, the first thing to find out is if there is a conspiracy. If there is, as a general rule, the criminal liability of all will be the same, because the act of one is the act of all.…

    • 8333 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grade 12 Law Exam Review

    • 4637 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * The accused can’t be convicted of aiding in the commission of a crime that he does not know is intended…

    • 4637 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics