Preview

Accomplice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2837 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Accomplice
ACCOMPLICE WITNESS- ASSIGNMENT

In the basic sense Accomplice Witness mean a witness to a crime who, either as principal, Accomplice, or Accessory, was connected with the crime by unlawful act or omission on his or her part, transpiring either before, at time of, or after commission of the offense, and whether or not he or she was present and participated in the crime . The word ‘accomplice’ has not been defined by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. An accomplice is one of the guilty associates or partners in the commission of a crime or who in some way or the other is connected with the commission of crime or who admits that he has a conscious hand in the commission of crime .
To the lay man, accomplice evidence might seem untrustworthy as accomplices are usually always interested and infamous witnesses but their evidence is admitted owing to necessity as it is often impossible without having recourse to such evidence to bring the principal offenders to justice. Thus accomplice evidence might seem unreliable but it is often a very useful and even invaluable tool in crime detection, crime solving and delivering justice and consequently a very important part of the Law of Evidence.
Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with the Accomplice Witness. It says that an accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.
Usually most of the crimes are committed at secluded places where there will not be any eye – witness to testify regard to these offences, and it would not be possible for the police to get sufficient evidence to prove the guilt of the accused. In such cases what police does is that it picks up one of the suspects arrested who is usually least guilty and offers to him an assurance that if he is inclined to divulge all information relating to the commission of the crime and give evidence against his own colleagues, he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Where there are suspicions that a crime may have taken place, the police should be contacted immediately and physical, forensic and other evidence should be preserved.…

    • 38861 Words
    • 156 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When a crime is reported to police, they have to gather enough information to make an arrest and sustain charges to be proven in court, beyond reasonable doubt.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evidence is crucial in forensic science because it can help solve crimes and clues in mysteries. We can find out who killed people in order to establish safety or solve crimes such as burglaries. All the evidence we had found played an important role in…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The evidence collection process is very extensive and must be accurately recorded and preserved. First there should be a plan of action. This includes making sure everyone at the scene knows how the evidence will be documented. If not all are on the same course of action important evidence could be damaged or removed. For example if an investigator walks on a footprint that was left by the suspect it probably won’t be able to get an accurate picture of the evidence and it is lost.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some kinds of evidence rely on honesty and trust. Direct evidence and testimonies both require help of people in the case you are in. Those people can twist the story, make the situation seem better for them, or sometimes they completely lie without a speck of truth. Forensic evidence doesn’t have to rely on truth. The evidence you gain from it has no argument. If you ask them if they committed the crime, they could lie and tell you no.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If you commit the crime, you are guilty”(Rush Limbaugh). Even though not all crimes are reported to the police, crime rates have fallen since the early 1990’s. For example, the country of Honduras has the average highest murder rate at about 90 people per 100,000 people. The criminals that commit the crime are most likely going to lie to you. They may make up stories and pretend it was something else. Queenie Keithley is guilty because she left the country club 10 minutes early, she was in an argument with her husband, Joe, and the glass in Joe’s hand was not broken after he “fell” down the stairs.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    to convict them which makes it harder for the detectives and attorneys to keep the suspects off…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime seems to be on a rise, from low poverty areas to the white collar vicinities. Today’s technology however, is assisting with the apprehension of criminals through the means of cameras, computers, fingerprinting and others. However, something that technology cannot help with is to identify the exact actions of individuals, nor can you duplicate what is seen by others. Eyewitnesses are so important when it comes to the criminal process. It’s vital for individuals to give accurate account of crimes witnessed. It is just as important for those that are gathering the information, or witness statements, to assess each eyewitness correctly, for that statement can put an innocent man in jail and a criminal back in the streets.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness testimony accounted for a majority of the convicted while others contained forensic evidence such as fingerprints, blood evidence, and hair comparison. A small percentage accounted for informant testimony which were found to be inaccurate. When pertaining to the court of appeals results showed that defective evidenced was not reviewed effectively. Consequently the convictions that were reversed only accounted for 14% with almost half consisting of actual inaccuracy. When reviewing the case at the appellate level justifying guilt or innocence is at the highest regard. Unfortunately this can often be difficult when having to make such a ruling while also deciding if an error exists. Defendants that pursued the appellate process were seldom successful challenging innocent claims. Due to the expense and difficulty of challenging the evidence. Convictions that did go to appeal for eyewitness identification were not reversed. Cases pertaining to federal claims did not proceed to appeal, even if they were innocent. Also defendants that gave false confessions only half actually raised a challenged, but none acknowledged a…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. It is important because, if you don’t have the right evidence and facts, you can’t find the criminal that did the crime. You might have evidence but the evidence could be false and you might take an innocent man and put him through trial for something he didn’t even do. So it is important to use the proper methods when you are collecting evidence.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Typically when a crime is committed one of the first questions that an investigator solicits becomes if there may have been anyone in the area of the crime at the time the crime occurred that would be able to identify the person responsible for the crime.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eyewitness Research Paper

    • 2540 Words
    • 11 Pages

    References: Doyle, James M. "True Witness: Cops, Courts, Science ... - James M. Doyle." Google Books. Web. 08 Nov. 2011. <http://books.google.com/books?id=vFx43Hmm4nMC>.…

    • 2540 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PACE

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss problems within the investigative process prior to The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). It will then go into detail as to when and why the Police and Criminal Evidence act was introduced and the codes entailed in it. Furthermore, it shall explain the advantages of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act being introduced and how it may have helped the investigative process including cases, as well as any disadvantages it may have caused, ending up with a clear conclusion of what the Police and Criminal Evidence Act is and whether or not it has helped or hindered the investigative process.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evidence builds the basis of any criminal trial. The judge regulates the evidence that is introduced into court. Evidence can be deemed inadmissible if it was illegally obtained under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), for example, police forcefully acquired the confession out of the suspect. Most evidence is in the form of oral statements – witnesses that are competent, compellable and non-privileged are called to testify. There are many issues regarding the reliability of evidence. Most trials take place a few months after the crime and witnesses are asked to recall information after this substantial amount of time. The witnesses may not remember all the information correctly or forgetting details as to what had occurred.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An interesting case that was currently brought before the Supreme Court was Missouri vs. Frye. I found this case interesting due to the injustice that was provided by Frye’s counsel, and that Frye insisted on committing the same crime over and over again even though he knew he had an open case concerning driving under a suspended license. There were many sources and jurisdictions related to criminal law that also relates to this case. Criminal liability is when one takes responsibility for committing a crime, and accomplice liability is when someone helps someone commit a crime. Actus reus means guilty act, mens rea means guilty mind, and concurrence means the equality of rights. Actus reus and mens rea are both necessary in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays