Preview

Supreme Court Case: Gideon Vs. Wainwright

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
297 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Case: Gideon Vs. Wainwright
The case Gideon V Wainwright all started when Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for possibly stealing pocket change, bottles of coke, beer, and wine. When Gideon went to trial Gideon believed that an attorney should be appointed to him under the 6th amendment the right to counsel ;however, the state of Florida decided that was for federal cases only. After Gideon lost his trial against the state of Florida Gideon found a way to take it further and appealed to the Supreme Court. Once Gideon appealed the supreme court took it from there mainly Hugo Black a justice that firmly believes that everyone deserves an attorney according to the 6th and 14th amendments in which he lost earlier in his career betts v. brady. Once the case was finished being
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Appellant Vs Fridays Case Summary
    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Appellant Vs Fridays Case Summary

    On April 11, 1996, Appellant Sandra Mitchell was having dinner at Appellee Friday's restaurant. Appellant was eating a fried clam strip when she bit into a hard substance which she believed to be a piece of a clam shell.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

    Defendant Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with breaken and entering a poolroom with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Defendant was denied request for appointed counsel on the grounds that under the laws of Florida only a defendant charged with a capital offense was entitled to such an appointment. Defendant was without funds. Defendant conducted his own defense. Defendant was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of five years in the state prison. Defendant filed in the Supreme Court of Florida the present habeas corpus petition, attacking his conviction on the ground that his federal constitutional rights were violated by the trial court's refusal to appoint counsel. The appeal was denied by the Florida Supreme…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Billy Graham V. Tchividjian
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of Billy Graham V. Tchividjian

    Rev. Billy Graham’s grandson Tullian Tchividjian has resurfaced from an adultery scandal with a new wife and a preaching on God’s redemption.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Summary
    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Summary

    In the case District of Columbia ( DC ) vs Heller an officer for DC got declined for the permit to have a gun in his home for the year. After this he decided that this was unfair and took it to court. He pointed out that he was a police officer and he carries a firearm with him at all times for the protection of others and himself, but the court denied him the right to have a firearm for the protection of him and his family. The constitutional issue with this case is the fact that it’s how DC wanted gun owners to break down their guns, have a trigger lock on it, and keep the ammo away from the firearm even though the gun is broken down without the trigger lock.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gideon V. Wainwright Case Study
    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gideon V. Wainwright Case Study

    In today’s information age, news is spread at lighting speed. News, gossip, sports scores, data can be reached from just about anywhere. Do we have access to too much information? Well the right to be informed in engraved in the constitution under the first amendment. This smorgasbord of news ensures that the people know details about the professional and sometimes even personal lives of elected and selected officials. When the conviction in the Supreme Court’s Gideon v. Wainwright was reversed, news spread across the country and those who were convicted without given the right to legal counsel could petition to have their cases retried as well.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Gideon V. Wainwright
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary: Gideon V. Wainwright

    Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), is a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution to provide lawyers in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Justice: Gideon vs. Wainwright, U.S. vs. Bagley, and In re Gault
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criminal Justice: Gideon vs. Wainwright, U.S. vs. Bagley, and In re Gault

    The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person brought into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, can’t be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law, can’t be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case

    Wainwright case that that everyone that ends up going to court has to be appointed a counsel to help defend themselves. People who can’t afford a counsel gets to get one through the state. They might not be the best person to help you though the case, but at least you get somebody to help you defined yourself during court. No matter how much money you have or don’t have you are required to have somebody no matter if you're the one who finds your counsel or if the supreme court finds the counsel for you. You are required to have one no matter what case it is or who it is against, even if they know you won’t come out free they are still inquired to give you a counsel. The impact that this court case made has help a thousand of people today win or lose cases. Hopefully many times it was helping them because your person you get for your counsel is suppose to make your case better and help you out not make it worse for…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gideon's Trumpet
    • 5160 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Gideon's Trumpet

    In his filing to the Court, Gideon�s case was originally titled Gideon v. Cochran.Gideon�s primary submission to the Court was a 5-page petition for writ of certiorari, which is a petition asking the Court to bring the case up from the lower court.Gideon had been convicted of breaking and…

    • 5160 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Inadmissible: The Superior Court Case
    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Inadmissible: The Superior Court Case

    The Superior Court ruled that the appeal should be allowed, and that this evidence should be considered inadmissible since the accused chose not to make any statements - he was practicing his right to remain silent. The police violated his right under s. 7 of the Charter by tricking him into opposing his decision, which then made the trial unjust. An undercover police officer must serve the purpose of observation of suspects, rather than actively drawing out evidence or information in violation of the person’s right to remain silent. Seeing as the statements were the only piece of evidence the Crown had in order to be able to prove the individual guilty, it’s evident that under the current conditions, it’s the admission of the evidence rather…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Speedy Trial Analysis
    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Speedy Trial Analysis

    The first pertinent point to make on behalf of the argument that Flordia must provide a lawyer for Mr. Gideon is that the 6th Amendment guarantees a person the right to consult a lawyer in his or her defense. For example, every person, no matter…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fisher V. University of Texas
    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fisher V. University of Texas

    This case was granted writ of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 and argued on Wednesday, October 10, 2012. The petitioner in this case is Abigail N. Fisher and the respondent is the University of Texas at Austin. Fisher filed suit with the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the court decided in favor of the University of Texas. The state of Texas has legislature that was enacted in 1997 that requires the admission into the University of Texas of all students that rank in the top 10% of their high school graduating class. The petitioner was not in this category, and was therefore judged on admission according to other factors. She was denied admission, and therefore sued the University based on violation of her Fourteenth Amendment Rights under the Equal Protection Clause.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Furman v. Georgia
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Furman v. Georgia

    In the history of Georgia, as well as in the rest of the United States, execution, or what is better known as the death penalty, was the result of a defendant found guilty in such crimes as murder and rape. In 1972, in the case of Furman v. Georgia the U.S. Supreme Court placed a moratorium, which is a delay or suspension of an activity or law, on the sentencing of Furman for capital punishment. They made the decision to end it in 1976, with the case of Gregg v. Georgia. Several court officials wrote that the use of capital punishment was cruel and unusual and it violated the 8th and the 14th amendments set by the U.S. Constitution. They also expressed similar concerns that it was racially targeting black defendants.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Brief Gideon V Wainwright
    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Legal Brief Gideon V Wainwright

    On June 2, 1961 there were some items stolen from Bay Harbor Pool Room, such as five dollars and a few bottles of beer and soda. Henry Cook told the police that he had seen Clarence Gideon walk out of the pool hall with a bottle of wine and his pockets filled with coins, then got into a taxi and left the joint. Major people that were involved were Clarence Earl Gideon the plaintiff, Louie L. Wainwright the defendant, H. G. Cochran, Jr. was the original respondent. The question about this trial was should a poor person be able to have an attorney provided for them so they can have a fair trial as same as the people could afford the attorney.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phelps v. Snyder
    • 2816 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Phelps v. Snyder

    “God hates you.” “You’re going to hell.” Could you imagine having to bury your child that returned to American soil, dead, after fighting a war, listening and seeing these kinds of statements? When burying a loved one, a person should not have to deal with people picketing at a private funeral. That person is in enough pain and emotional loss for having to bury a family member. This is not more of an inappropriate or inconsiderable time than ever to be causing a negative scene and displaying a strong sense of hatred on someone who just recently lost their life fighting for this country. Albert Snyder, father of the late Matthew Snyder, has every right in his power to be suing Fred Phelps, pastor and founder of Westboro Baptist Church and the congregation, in seeking redemption for Matthew on numerous grounds. I, personally, have the right to be buried and laid in peace as does everyone else. A family should have the right to bury their loved one with no interference from others. Burying a person is part of life and to invade one’s personal right is unlawful. Westboro Baptist Church did not have the right to be present at Matthew Snyder’s funeral and in doing so I believe the decision made by the United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit should be reversed by the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 2816 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics