Preview

Supremacy of Eu Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supremacy of Eu Law
Supremacy/ Primacy of European Union Law

Introduction:
State sovereignty and supremacy of European Union law are traditionally seen as fundamentally opposite in nature. The rights of states to deal with national issues internally, in compliance with national law, versus the obligation on states to subordinate national law to Community law.
Where it is contained:
Historically the EEC treaty contained no provision dealing with the concept of supremacy of Community law over the national law of member states. In fact, treaties were generally silent as to the nature of the relationship between EU law and national law except for a general obligation contained in article 4 (3) TEU which states:-
“‘Pursuant to the principle of sincere cooperation, the Union and the Member States shall, in full mutual respect, assist each other in carrying out tasks which flow from the Treaties.
The Member States shall take any appropriate measure, general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of the Treaties or resulting from the acts of the institutions of the Union.
The Member States shall facilitate the achievement of the Union's tasks and refrain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the Union's objectives.’
The concept of Supremacy is now, however, contained in declaration 17 within the Treaty of Lisbon. The declaration is not a formal provision and has no binding basis within the treaty due to the dropping of the proposed provision at the behest of the European Council in 2007, largely due to the controversial reception by member states of the ambiguous provision. Declaration 17 provides that:
“In accordance with well settled case law of the court of justice, the treaties and law adopted by the union on the basis of treaties have primacy over the law of Member States, under conditions laid down by the said case law”
Development of concept:
Since no formal provision was contained within the treaties concerning the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1996 Apush Exam

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The unconditional adherence of the United Stated to the charter of the League of Nations…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 Essay Example

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Establishes clear obligations for member countries to ensure that their legal framework is in line with the provisions of the Convention’…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Greenfield Venture

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Consolidated version of the treaty on European Union. (2010). Office Journal of the European Union, 115(17), 13-44.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Micheal Dougan in “When worlds collide: competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy” opined that the principle of supremacy has been used as a tool to exclude national law which is inconsistent with EU law.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Enforcement of Eu Law

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When the EC makes a law it is up to the individual state to implement the legislation. An example of EU law which has been passed which has been adopted in the UK is that of the directive 75/117 which states that men and women should receive equal pay. The UK government adopted this directive with the 1975 Sex discrimination Act.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government

    • 2602 Words
    • 11 Pages

    If the European government decide on a law then the other countries have to follow. For example: no guns; this means that the UK cannot use guns.…

    • 2602 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Parliament must now legislate consistently with European Community Law. The terms of the European treaties as interpreted by the European Court of Justice require member states to limit their sovereignty, by Parliament giving direct effect and primacy to EU Law. The European Court of Justice states that European Community Law should be enforceable in the courts of member states and that EU law prevails domestic law of member state, which includes the United Kingdom. The ECJ, as the judicial institution of the Community, is the backbone of that system of safeguards. It is responsible for interpreting questions of EC law and provision is made in the Treaty for references to the ECJ by national courts. Decisions of the ECJ, upon a reference, are reached by majority vote and are binding on all domestic courts of all Member States. Under Article 234 the ECJ has achieved the principle of supremacy and its uniform application in all Member States when Community law may be in conflict with domestic…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To some extent the EU has become a superstate due to federalist features that combine the member states of the European Union closer together. For Eurosceptic British who oppose the further integration between the states have defined the EU’s superstate to be a huge, centralized Brussels Bureaucracy limiting the sovereign authority of member states. This can be controversial as those in favour of the EU would prefer to grant some powers to a central body as they can achieve benefits in return for example the single market.…

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History of NATO

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They agreed upon that NATO member being attacked are considered as attacks against them all. Consequently they agreed that, in case of such an attack, each of them will do whatever it takes to restore and maintain the security.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument that shows there is conflict between judges and government minsters is that EU law is superior to British made law. This means that any government legislation that does not coincide with EU law, will not stand up in the European Court, so…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The courts held that 'as Community law now stands, the Community has no competence to accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.' A lot of logics and reasons were given for this conclusion, the most important one included the fact that under Article 3(b) of the EC Treaty, the nation and the community is to act within the scope and the extension of its capacity as defined by the provisions of the Treaty and nothing else. Moreover, the judges decided to grant the ECHR special community relevant status in previous case law , so this would be the most they would carry on going without being proclaimed legally binding. Craig and De Burca also complained that the ECJ and ECtHR should classify themselves as two separate and different legal entities watching over certain rights that would be relevant to their jurisdiction.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The European Communities Act 1972 has been enacted by the parliament and it’s sought to bring a voluntary end to parliamentary sovereignty or at least render it as secondary. This has made the EU law a definitive supremacy as the parliament can’t make any laws that are in way of the current EU law. This is shown in the case of Costa , where the European Court of Justice shows supremacy over the member states. On the other hand the Factortame i case shows that the parliament still has control over its…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lisbon Treaty

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The aim of the treaty, as stated in the preamble was "to complete the process started by the Treaty of Amsterdam [1997] and by the Treaty of Nice [2001] with a view to enhancing the efficiency and democratic legitimacy of the Union and to improving the coherence of its action."…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays