Preview

Summary: Religious Indoctrine And False Teachings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: Religious Indoctrine And False Teachings
Chapter 2
Religious Indoctrine and False Teachings

In AD 833, the Council of Nicaea had made up a plan to let the Caucasoid be seen as human by putting himself in a place of God, i.e., Jesus Christ. Constantine, one of the helpers to create Christianity and other religions, was a Roman emperor and an absolute tyrant. He murdered anyone who didn’t or wouldn’t conform to religion; this included his own blood. He killed his wife of twenty years, his son, daughter, and brother-in-law, and he strangled his mother to death. If this isn’t enough evidence that religion enslaves you, Constantine’s advisor and good friend was a man named Naziansus. Constantine also named a city after him. The feeding of the lions was actually the feeding of the Kemetic
…show more content…
Yes, religion broke these two apart and hoped they do not come together to create a more full form of enlightenment. The Roman Christian pastors knew about the metaphysical teaching of the Moors but were too scared to speak out on the flaws of the religion. Constantine and Nero were tyrants that would’ve done anything to keep too much light away from weak eyes. If any of the church fathers would have spoken openly about Christianity, they would have been killed, fed to the lions, and tossed aside as nothing then rewritten in history as villains, Caucasoids, or commoners. This is why the Valentinian Gnostics were the Moors who conform to Christians in mainstream but, secretly, were teaching esoteric knowledge to people who they thought they could trust. Valentinus was a Moor from Kemet or what most people would refer to as Egypt. He was exceptional at writing and philosophy. When Valentinus was of age, he set out to the rest of the world to eventually start the Valentinian …show more content…
The cast of those plays were Jesus, Mary the Virgin, Mary Magdalene, John the Baptist, and the apostles. Those characters were and are set in place to represent principles of yourself in relation to everything else in existence. The Setian Gnostics are the ones who openly say that Jesus never existed. He was a mythological character based on a composite of energy signatures that exist long before him. Biblically, Seti or Seth who would be seen or betrayed as the third son of Adam and Eve, had attained esoteric knowledge from the teachings of his parents. Seti is also an allegorical god (deity) in Kemet. Predynastically, he represented Satan, which is the subconscious part of you that is so old it doesn’t have a point of origin—it just is. Dynastically, Seti represented Cain and Abel because Seti killed his brother Ausar (Osiris) then chopped Ausar’s body up to thirteen to fourteen pieces, with the last piece (the phallice) eaten by the catfish. As you begin to understand Gnosticism, you will see that Gnosticm itself is an ever-growing comprehension of yourself. Seti or Seth is a deity or a character that survives directly from the shifting of myths through the age of hierarchy to Christian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Chhi 520 Task 1

    • 2800 Words
    • 12 Pages

    However, like most Christians, an understanding of his own Christianity would have most likely increased. It is clear that he supported Christianity because he believed the experience he had was divine and the victory his troops had won would not have been possible without the help of God. It does appear to be clear that Constantine’s conversion was convenient for his own aspirations; he did support a unity and “harmony” of the church and state and he pursued and implemented policies to end Christian persecutions and provide an inclusiveness and flexibility for Christians and extended poser to the authority of the church and his subjects.12 It may be prudent to hold judgment regarding the validity or authenticity of Constantine’s Christianity when one understands Constantine’s motives or actions. One such action which leads one to judgment is the fact that Constantine delayed his own baptism until near his death in 337 and that Constantine had his wife, Fausta, and his son Crispus murdered for political reasons. However, in Constantine’s mind, such actions may not have been contradictory but a necessity of the responsibly he may have felt for the religious welfare of his subjects and the state along with personal weakness from being simply human, despite his conversion. Individuals within scripture were at times no different. King David and Moses come to…

    • 2800 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the rule of Constantine the empire became increasingly bound together by the spread of Christianity throughout its people and its rulers. Constantine not only tolerated Christians, but embraced them and became one. Under Constantine’s leadership, the Roman Empire was transformed from Pagan to Christian and transposed from West to East. The issue of whether Constantine had indeed "seen the light" or if he simply saw Christianity as a political tool gain control of the empire is still a matter of debate. Regardless of his motives there was a fundamental change in church-state relations under Constantine. Where previous Emperors would persecute Christians, Constantine sat among bishops and talked theology with them. It is important…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If you are looking for both sides of the argument Integrative Approaches to Psycology and Christianity is your book. If gives the different models and different theories to back each one up completely. Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity was a great read. Entwistle did an amazing job on putting together a great read with some different aspects to things. The author’s thoughts are trying to explain the truth of God’s word and show the insights it has on psychology. Integration which there were several different theories and approaches to the two, is what this book revolved around. The argumentation of integration and psychology are still a question with no right or wrong answers. While most of his arguments had biblical truths with in them he could argue that they didn’t. The psychology world has seen many pros to people believing in Christianity. It’s been a great stress reliever as well as a different mindset for people. The book explains that t sacred and secular combatants when it comes to the truth. Human nature is we are all born with sin having good and evil within our souls and hearts. Within the reading society has seemed to always struggle on integrating the two. You have government that tells us we must separate church and state, you have some within society that would like to see the two integrate together again. We have seen in Entwistles works that people have within the church come up with science ideals. These approaches and studies however were hidden because religion was scared they no longer had the answers. For these two different parts of life to truthfully integrate people are going to have to put their feelings aside and work together; compromise is the only way these two will always over shadow the other. Epistemology, metaphysics and philosophical anthropologies are important to exam within the worldview of things. By examining the two books…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Roman Empire

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the main differences between the two empires was their religions. Christianity, in Rome, was greatly opposed by religious institutions of the native Judaea and had to go against the official cults of Rome and also the “mystery” religions including Isis, Mithra, and Osiris. After the acceptance of Constantine, the Roman empire became mainly Christian. Constantine discontinued the persecution of Christians and supported the church. Christianity eventually influenced a lot of beliefs and decisions of the future rulers of Rome and appealed to lower class people…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman religion and Christianity both express many similar foundational and structural ideas. Romans and Christians share the same base of strong moral as well as respect for authority. The Roman family’s shrines to the gods although not exactly the same is very similar to Jesus’s followers enamored by his teachings, and in turn was very cult-like. They were passionate about their gods, and needed to express that. Both religions believe in sacrifice. Roman’s would sacrifice themselves, food, and objects in order to please the gods, while Jesus sacrificed himself for humanities sins, others who followed in Jesus’s footsteps were considered Martyrs. Another similarity belongs in the hierarchy and social status, Rome was very structured with the patron-client system, which focused on respect. The hierarchy of Christianity was focused on doctrine and keeping internal strife at bay, as did Rome’s hierarchy.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we saw in class, according to the Gnostic interpretation of Genesis, the creator god of the Old Testament is a bad god because he imprisoned Adam’s and Eve’s soul in a world of misery. Through this understanding of creation, this creator god created man incapable of distinguishing between good and evil, ignorant of his origin and destination. In this way, the Gnosis believes that the creator god did not want man to know his true origin. It seems that the Gnosis believe that the creator God does not want man to realize in which spiritual situation he is in, who he is, and why he was created. In other words, this creator god wants man to remain in ignorance.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    C.S Lewis

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bibliography: Lewis, C. S., C. S. Lewis, C. S. Lewis, and C. S. Lewis. Mere Christianity. London: Fount, 1997. Print.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the 4th century, the status of Christianity changed due to the efforts of a single person, Constantine the Great, who officially promoted and allowed Christianity in the empire of Rome. Christianity may lead people to think about the great saints, leaders of the church, bishops or martyrs. But it is believed that in the starting of the 4th century, Constantine the Great made a revolutionary transformation which cemented the unbelievable connection between the Christian Church and the civil state. Facing many obstacles, Constnantine had to create a full political, religious and social transition, in order for Christianity to secure a main stream foothold and thus spread. This becomes evident during the reign of Constantine, as the Christian religion that had been persecuted as a perilous sect became licit, and was incorporated into the life of the empire.…

    • 4839 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dark Ages Notes

    • 1026 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4. The Romans hired foreign soldiers to help protect their borders. What term describes such a…

    • 1026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. How did the term “Christian” originate? A derogatory attack against the Disciple in Antioch (Acts 11:26)…

    • 9120 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Celsus aimed to answer and examine, as assuming questioning Jew, the entire Christian faith. He dissects its irrational beginnings to the unoriginality of their beliefs. "Many of the ideas of the christians have been expressed better-- and earlier-- by the greeks, who were however modest enough to refrain from saying that their ideas came from a god or a son of god (Celsus pg 92-93). And the…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Image of God

    • 2518 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “The most distinctive feature of the biblical understanding of man is the teaching that man has been created in the image of God”. (Hoekema, 1986). The bible refers to man being made in God’s image in both the Old Testament and the New Testament. In the Old Testament, the book of Genesis references man being made in God’s image in the Creation Story, in explanation of the generations of Adam to Noah and also again in the Covenant With Noah. Genesis: 1:26-28; 5:1-3 and 9:6. The New Testament references in many different books that man was made in the likeness of God and also speaks frequently of Jesus as being the perfect man who is made in the image of God. Hoekema states “Since Christ was totally without sin (Heb 4:15), in Christ we see the image of God in its perfection”. Christian belief follows that man was made in the image of God; however, differing theologians have developed differing theories over the years in regards to what it means to be made in the image of…

    • 2518 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think the intellectuals we have learned and talked about this chapter really helped me out with how they felt. I agree with what the person had said because the people talking were very intelligent and they knew what they were talking about. I think religion was very important because it let you do what you wanted and believe in what you want to believe in. It lets you be different than everyone else and no one judges you.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morton Hunt, the author of the article – “The Biological Roots of Religion- Is Faith in Our Genes” summed up the socio-biological theory of the roots of religion as: “genetically built into early human beings was a set of mental, emotional, and social needs that caused culture to develop in certain ways, including the development of various religions, and caused culture reciprocally to favour and select for evolution those human traits that provided socio-cultural advantages to the individuals possessing them”. Morton wrote the article by posing a fundamental question – why are unbelievers so different from the overwhelming majority of their fellow human being? In response, he stated that throughout civilized history, a small minority never…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Religion it the opium of the masses” is one of the most frequently paraphrased statements of the German economist Karl Marx, “the father of communism”. The meaning of this statement is that religion is the equivalent of opium (a type of drug) to make masses of people feel better. Marx quoted that “religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless wold, and the soul of the soulless condition.”…

    • 526 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays