Preview

Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg
My Own Words, written by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, is an autobiography presented through a series of collected written works and lectures. Co-Authors Hartnett and Williams provide context to Justice Ginsburg’s works, ranging from an editorial written by a young middle schooler Ginsburg to several of her Supreme Court arguments and rulings. Ginsburg, the daughter of a middle-class Brooklyn Jewish family, rose far beyond her humble upbringing to become only the second female Supreme Court Justice. Justice Ginsburg uses her background as a template throughout the book to discuss not only her views of Constitutional jurisprudence, but also her views on feminism, society, and beyond. There are several prevalent themes throughout …show more content…
“One is that we were betraying our most fundamental values, and, two, that legal skills could help make things better, could help to challenge what was going on.”” (21) The then student Ginsburg would take that advice to heart, especially later in her academic career as she began arguing cases in front of the Court and promoting feminist causes writ large. It would be at Cornell that she made her first foray into Constitutional law in a letter to the Cornell Daily Sun wherein she questioned the use of wiretapping against suspected communists by the federal government: “In the first place, what is the purpose of the criminal sanction? Is it just to put a man behind bars, or is it to attach the moral condemnation of the community to certain forms of behavior? Unless moral judgment is involved, the cost of enforcing the criminal code might well be employed in other areas.” (22) Her later jurisprudence would reflect this attitude. Of Justice Ginsburg, it is said: “Always, she pays careful attention to the history and purpose, fairness and effectiveness, of the rules that shape and direct our justice system. Throughout her speeches and writings, she includes “sideglances” at the justice systems of sister democracies for the light they shine on our own and offers homage to the waypavers and the pathmarkers who have improved our world through law.” (193) These “sideglances” are seen in sections such as one discussing Brown vs. Board of Education and another from a speech discussing the value of diversity. The book also includes several of her own Court opinions and dissents in which this principle is illustrated – namely, her dissents in Shelby vs. Holder and Gonzales vs.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kathleen Parker gives her judgment on newly appointed supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch. Her purpose is to denounce the ‘left wing’ slander of this new ‘right wing’ judge. Parker states facts and gives reasoning to show why we should feel secure about Trump’s appointee. In the article, Kathleen Parker using contradicting descriptions of Neil Gorsuch to display his true characteristics. When recalling the Democrats reaction to Neil Gorsuch, Parker says they painted Gorsuch as a ‘cruel and bloodless beast who shrinks from the light and plays havoc with history.’ However, contrasting this view are Gorsuch true characteristics; a man who is ‘courageous in protecting the people and the constitution by adhering to the text and original intent without…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article gives the concise information about the nomination of Sandra O’Connor. First, Reagan nominated O’Connor because of his previous promise. Next, Sandra O’Connor was an attorney, a judge and the first female state Senate majority leader in the country. The author also provides the names of the two famous people who support her. They are Barry Goldwater and William Rehnquist. Lastly, the article tells how long she served on the Supreme Court and her impact to the percentage of female law students from her nomination to her…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobby Lobby Case

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As an avid observer of both law and philosophy, it is with utmost honesty that I try to look at the application of policy through both lenses of social consciousness and thorough use of logic. In my findings, it is almost certain that liberalism adheres to no such system that allows for nuance or exemption. In applying liberalities as it pertains to the law, it is assured that one finds oneself stuck in a paradox of one kind or another, whether or not such contradictions are scrutinized closely or from afar.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal scholars and sociologists have debated the effectiveness of litigation and whether it is an effective tool for bringing social change to marginalized groups. Gerald Rosenberg is one of the legal scholars that believes that courts are ineffective due to the fact they are inherently constrained by political and constitutional limitations. According to his first perspective, Rosenberg believes courts by design are unable to hear social reform claims, courts lack independence from the political branches/public opinion and lack the power to implement their decisions (McCann 1992, 717). His second perspective the “dynamic court view” he argues that the dynamic court contains a judiciary that is powerful and can be starters of change, but not…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Columbia Law School, Cornell University, and Harvard Law School graduate, became the second woman to ever be given a position in the Supreme Court. Born into a low income family in Brooklyn, New York on March 15, 1933, Ginsburg was frequently exposed to gender discrimination throughout her college years—as there were “only 8 other females in a class of 500 students” at Harvard Law—as well as in the work force. This ultimately pushed her to fight for gender equality. She began her career as a clerk and then teacher, becoming Columbia University’s first tenured teacher who was a woman. Following this, she took on several projects in which she fought for the rights of woman in front of the Supreme Court of the United…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    since 2002. The lack of Congress’s concern to transfer the remaining prisoners to facilities located…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dowd portrays the Justices as being out of touch by referring to the “The Nine” (Dowd, 2013) as being “back there in their Miss Havisham lairs” (Dowd, 2013). This reference to Charles Dickens Great Expectations character Miss Havisham, a spoiled, rich women who has separated herself from reality and knows nothing of real life and its trials, shows that Dowd views the Justices as completely out of touch with the general public and what the general public wants. This view of the Justices as being detached from the pulse of the nation may stem from her upbringing. Dowd was born, raised and attended college in Washington D.C. Her father was a police inspector on the Washington D.C. police force. In 1986, Dowd became the Washington correspondent for The New York Times (Dowd, Bio). Her harsh criticism of anything political comes from growing up in the city of politicians and then having interaction with them as a newspaper reporter. Here she saw first-hand the special treatment and arrogance of those who hold high political offices, which would include members of the Supreme Court. This insight into the attitude of the privileged…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scalia vs Breyer

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, Stephen Breyer promotes a highly specialized Constitutional philosophy known as the living constitution or evolutionist approach. In his book Active Liberty, he illustrates this approach to constitutional interpretation, which focuses primarily on making America’s experiment in democracy functional by giving a voice to the people through the collective opinions and judgments of the nine unelected Justices of the Supreme Court. The notion of active liberty allows not only a democratic boost of power to American citizens by giving their convictions influence over judges’ interpretation of the Constitution, but also focuses practically on the consequences that rulings have for the American people…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in the First Amendment to the Constitution. So why do we need to be concerned…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chester, Burke. Individual rights, not human rights. (Letters)(Letter to the editor). Florida Bar News (Oct. 15, 2008) p.2(1) General OneFile Retrieved from Gale Apollo Library on Nov.14, 2008. http://find.galegroup.com.ezproxy.apollolibray.com/ips/retrieve.do?…

    • 2544 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We the People

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How do Classical Republicanism and Natural rights philosophers affect the Founders view about government because, both the Classical Republicans and Natural Rights philosophers impacted the Founders view about the government. In the preamble it shows that there are more Classical Republicans signatures and a few Natural rights philosophers’ signatures. The three court cases that I chose were Betts v. Brady, Bowers v. Hardwick, and Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan. In the first case Brady v. Betts in 1995, Betts was the offender, who robbed a place in Maryland but could not afford and attorney. The 6th amendment then comes into play because it sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. Betts could not defend himself in the case and he was sent to jail. Classical Republicanism is shown here because Betts stated he did not have an attorney to the judge. And the Judge and said that in the 6th amendment it did not include the rights to an attorney. Which also rules in favor of Natural Rights philosophy? The second case I decided to go with was Bowers v. Hardwick 1985, Michael Hardwick was being observed by a Georgia officer while he had been engaged in sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex. Hardwick’s first amendment rights were violated by the police officer by observing Hardwick in his own personal life. In this case it shows a huge chunk of Classical Republicanism because the court had agreed with Hardwick that he had violated his rights. Although the officer had denied the fact that he violated the rights of Hardwick, the court still sided with Hardwick. In my last case Lorreto v. Teleprompter Manhattan 1982, a company had violated a customer’s rights to privacy which means violating the fourth amendment. Classical Republicanism is shown in this case because they say it is a violation of privacy. Natural rights Philosophy is show because they say that the company…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Interview

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the United States Constitution was established, the founding fathers devised the core of the court system that is present in today’s society. The state and federal government each have a version of a Supreme Court which is typically led by a Chief Justice. The states level Supreme Court Justice governs the issues that pertains to the citizens within the respective state. These individuals will also take part in hearings or proceedings that impact of law of the state and hear constitutional cases with regards to the state. On the federal side, a Supreme Court Chief Justice will operates more on a national level, ruling over cases that such as states taking one another to court. The federal court has authority over anything to do with the United States Constitution and this paper will interview State Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on the current issue of same-sex marriage that was recently passed for the state of Alabama.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Supreme Court was established pursuant to Article Three of the United States Constitution in 1789, the extent to which the Supreme Court can affect social change has always been disputable. Scholars developed different definitions of social change and looked in different fields to discuss the Court's effect. Expanding on their ideas, I argue that the Court is successful in generating attention from society to the cases it decides on, yet it takes time for changes in public opinion and implementing the rulings. Focusing on three significant cases decided by the Court— Brown v. Board of Education (Brown) in 1954, Roe v. Wade (Roe) in 1973, and Obergefell v. Hodges (Obergefell) in 2015, and drawing together and analyzing data and…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays