Preview

Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
980 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu
Task A
In Maureen Dowd’s opinion column entitled “Happily Never After?” she expresses doubt in the Supreme Courts ability to rule in a way that she feels is fair to the Gay and Lesbian community. In her view the Supreme Court Justices are out of touch with society and they will fail to provide equality for gay couples who are only seeking equal respect in the law; to be treated just like other Americans and have the legal right to marry in their “pursuit of happiness.”
Dowd begins her article with the sentence “I’m worried about the Supreme Court” (Dowd, 2013). The word “worried” reappears in the very next sentence. That, in conjunction with the words “disconcertingly disconnected” (Dowd, 2013) used to describe the Justices in the following paragraph denotes an anxious tone and a concern for the ability of the Justices. Dowd portrays the Justices as being out of touch by referring to the “The Nine” (Dowd, 2013) as being “back there in their Miss Havisham lairs” (Dowd, 2013). This reference to Charles Dickens Great Expectations character Miss Havisham, a spoiled, rich women who has separated herself from reality and knows nothing of real life and its trials, shows that Dowd views the Justices as completely out of touch with the general public and what the general public wants. This view of the Justices as being detached from the pulse of the nation may stem from her upbringing. Dowd was born, raised and attended college in Washington D.C. Her father was a police inspector on the Washington D.C. police force. In 1986, Dowd became the Washington correspondent for The New York Times (Dowd, Bio). Her harsh criticism of anything political comes from growing up in the city of politicians and then having interaction with them as a newspaper reporter. Here she saw first-hand the special treatment and arrogance of those who hold high political offices, which would include members of the Supreme Court. This insight into the attitude of the privileged



Cited: Dowd, Maureen. (2013). Happily Never After? Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/03/opinion/dowd-happily-never-after.html?ref=columnists (accessed April 3, 2013) Maureen Dowd. (2013). The Biography Channel website. Retrieved from http://www.biography.com/people/maureen-dowd-278915. (accessed April, 5 2013) Excerpt from “Happily Never After?” by Maureen Dowd I’m worried about the Supreme Court. I’m worried about how the justices can properly debate same-sex marriage when some don’t even seem to realize that most Americans use the word “gay” now instead of “homosexual”; when Chief Justice John Roberts thinks gays are merely concerned with marriage as a desirable “label,” and when Justice Samuel Alito compares gay marriage to cellphones. The Nine are back there in their Miss Havisham lairs mulling, disconcertingly disconnected. In his zeal to scare people about the “possible deleterious effect” of gay parents adopting, Justice Antonin Scalia did not seem fully cognizant that gays and lesbians can have their own biological children.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kathleen Parker gives her judgment on newly appointed supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch. Her purpose is to denounce the ‘left wing’ slander of this new ‘right wing’ judge. Parker states facts and gives reasoning to show why we should feel secure about Trump’s appointee. In the article, Kathleen Parker using contradicting descriptions of Neil Gorsuch to display his true characteristics. When recalling the Democrats reaction to Neil Gorsuch, Parker says they painted Gorsuch as a ‘cruel and bloodless beast who shrinks from the light and plays havoc with history.’ However, contrasting this view are Gorsuch true characteristics; a man who is ‘courageous in protecting the people and the constitution by adhering to the text and original intent without…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Brethren, co-authored by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, is an in-depth documentary of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1975, under the leadership of Warren Burger. The book attempts to present the reader with what "really" goes on in the Supreme Court. It describes the conferences, the personality of justices, and how justice's feel toward each other, items which are generally hidden from the public. This book is comparable to a lengthy newspaper article. Written more as a source of information than of entertainment, The Brethren is the brutal truth, but not boring. The storytelling is clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is better to be hated for what you are then to be loved for what you are not,” this was said by Andre Gide and there has never been a more true statement. In this paper the topic of Obergefell V. Hodges will be discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic, but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ted Cruz has been so far only GOP candidate to animadvert the same-sex court ruling sternly enough to ignite the social conservatives. While all other GOP candidates showed controlled reaction on the law, Cruz tears the court ruling down and takes the opposition of same-sex marriage as ‘front and center’ of his presidential election campaign. Most of the GOP candidates have criticized the law but ended up obeying it ‘showing respect’ to the law except for Cruz, who has initiated campaigning against same-sex marriage ruling in Iowa. He also has excoriated the court for upholding Obamacare. He suggests that the court has overstepped its bounds.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unless moral judgment is involved, the cost of enforcing the criminal code might well be employed in other areas.” (22) Her later jurisprudence would reflect this attitude. Of Justice Ginsburg, it is said: “Always, she pays careful attention to the history and purpose, fairness and effectiveness, of the rules that shape and direct our justice system. Throughout her speeches and writings, she includes “sideglances” at the justice systems of sister democracies for the light they shine on our own and offers homage to the waypavers and the pathmarkers who have improved our world through law.” (193) These “sideglances” are seen in sections such as one discussing Brown vs. Board of Education and another from a speech discussing the value of diversity.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Back in October Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy gave a nearly irrelevant opinion. The case being about Civil Rights of a jury and his opinion being about the inadequate conditions faced by the inmates in solitary confinement. At the same time Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas disapproved of Justice Kennedy’s claim and went as far as to say “a far sight more spacious than those in which his victims,” regarding to how the conditions of these prisons are much better than the alternative of being in a coffin. The article then goes to mention the many instances that Supreme Court Judges use their power of writing dissenting opinions, and how certain legal historians such as Melvin Urofsky have realized…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judiciary Branch

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The judiciary branch of the United States’ government is comprised of a system of courts, on both federal and state levels, which are used to bring justice to cases between citizens of the States. The power of judicial review gives the courts the authority “to review and, if necessary, declare actions of the legislative and executive branches invalid or unconstitutional” (Ginsberg). It’s interesting that the branch that works to uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution is sometimes viewed as the “least dangerous branch” of our Government. Referring to writings such as Federalist 78 (by Alexander Hamilton) and Brutus 12 (by James Madison), clears up exactly what the judiciary was set up for, why it is important to have in our Government system, and how it might affect the other branches, the executive and legislative. It is clear while reading the works that the two writers have opposing views. Therefore, it is crucial to study both works and compare their ideas to our current Judiciary to understand how our country has undergone changes within the system.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout this semester we have learned about the processes, decision making, and what influences judges in their siding on court cases. We have learned that judges make decisions based on their political party affiliation. They also make decisions on according to their own beliefs or morals. But what makes someone fall into the political party they are in? Most say their beliefs and morals, however I do not disagree, I believe there is more to it. Taking it a step further, how or why someone believes what they do can usually be traced back to their parents, upbringing, family, and region of the United States they are from. For example take the Bush…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the first time in Supreme Court history, gay men and women were seen not as some powerful lobby trying to subvert America, but as the people we truly are—the sons and daughters of countless mothers and fathers, with all the weaknesses and strengths and hopes of everybody else. And what we seek is not some special place in America but merely to be a full and equal part of America, to give back to our society without being forced to lie or hide or live as…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author is reflecting on the potential position on the then nomination of John Roberts, who is…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an arrogant and hostile tone, Margaret Court writes that homosexuals should not be able to get married, that the marriage between people of the same gender is against the “fundamental Christian values”. Throughout the opinion piece, Court portrays gays as a negative mark on society, she says that “they” are taking everything that is “good” in society and “pushing it to the side”. Basically stating that homosexuals are negatively affecting “us”, she uses exclusive language to make it seem as though homosexuals are not human, as though they are different to humans, separating us (the audience) from them. Margaret Court believes that a person is not born gay, she believes that it is a “work of the flesh”. Meaning she believes that if a person grows up in a household were he/she is told that they are gay, that soon enough they will believe that they are homosexual. Margaret Court argues that if we…

    • 1166 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays