Strict Gun Laws Essay
Restricting open access to guns not only complies with the constitutional standard but also ensures the safety of the general public by limiting who purchases and acquires guns. There are numerous ways to access guns in the United States - legal ways include gun stores, pawn shops, gun shows, private citizens and Internet sales and illegal ways are not limited to gun trafficking, theft and straw purchases. It’s notable that background check is only required by federally licensed gun dealers. Guns sold at private ends by unlicensed dealers who are not required by law to perform background check are uncountable.
People who repeatedly buy and sell firearms with the intention to make a profit regardless of the means of transaction and the occasion …show more content…
In this case, states have come up with the universal background check that requires background check for all sales of firearms by both licensed and unlicensed dealers before a transaction. Eight states including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington State and D.C. enforce universal background checks. Among which, New York, California, Massachusetts, Illinois, Rhode Island and Maryland even require background checks at private sections. It’s also a common phenomenon that states with strict gun laws tend to have lower murder rates and suicide rates than states with loose gun laws. Strict gun law states could have achieved lower criminal rates if bordering states enforce more regulations on firearms transactions. Take Illinois, a state with strict gun laws and low crime rates, as an example. The crime rates in Illinois could have been lower if it were not for Wisconsin and Indiana’s lax regulation on gun sales. Another compelling example would be Chicago, a city with meticulous gun regulation laws. It’s shocking that out-of-state guns compose more than fifty percent of all guns confiscated by the police in criminal activities. As a result, Chicago serves as a firm advocator of a nation-wide universal background
People who repeatedly buy and sell firearms with the intention to make a profit regardless of the means of transaction and the occasion …show more content…
In this case, states have come up with the universal background check that requires background check for all sales of firearms by both licensed and unlicensed dealers before a transaction. Eight states including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington State and D.C. enforce universal background checks. Among which, New York, California, Massachusetts, Illinois, Rhode Island and Maryland even require background checks at private sections. It’s also a common phenomenon that states with strict gun laws tend to have lower murder rates and suicide rates than states with loose gun laws. Strict gun law states could have achieved lower criminal rates if bordering states enforce more regulations on firearms transactions. Take Illinois, a state with strict gun laws and low crime rates, as an example. The crime rates in Illinois could have been lower if it were not for Wisconsin and Indiana’s lax regulation on gun sales. Another compelling example would be Chicago, a city with meticulous gun regulation laws. It’s shocking that out-of-state guns compose more than fifty percent of all guns confiscated by the police in criminal activities. As a result, Chicago serves as a firm advocator of a nation-wide universal background