Gun Control Is Bad Essay
Gun Control is when you keep firearms of any type, including handguns, High power rifles and even low caliber hunting rifles such as a .22 long rifle away from people. Many people think that gun control is the right way to go because they think keeping guns away from people will lower the death rate of people by guns. Also, just whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts of violence and negativity pop into the heads of many people, myself included, think gun control is wrong because we know that it is not necessary, since we know that guns were not involved in a large percentage of deaths caused each year. While many other people disagree and think that a law will keep guns out of people's hands and keep them safer. All laws do is keep
…show more content…
Those good people of the United States would have to live their life without personal protection while the real criminals are walking around with guns. A criminal will break the law to own a gun, and the police can't be everywhere at once. That leaves the good people out of luck and left unprotected. Only people that have been arrested or have a record of violence actives for example, murder, robbery and domestic violence should be the people with gun control laws covering them. There should be criminal control, not gun control. In the year 1996 the U.S. Justice Department estimated there were around 660k gang members and almost half so around 310k of these gang members have guns, although gun control laws have already been established in most parts of the U.S. What Happens when those gangs attack good people and they can't protect themselves, good people die. There should not be gun control because even though there are gun control criminals will always have a way to get guns such as through the black market where people make guns and sell them illegally. The vast majority of people buy guns for protection and self-defense along with Hunting depending on what you want out of your firearm. In 1856 the Supreme Courts have ruled that the government does not have a specific duty to protect individuals. In the U.S.
Those good people of the United States would have to live their life without personal protection while the real criminals are walking around with guns. A criminal will break the law to own a gun, and the police can't be everywhere at once. That leaves the good people out of luck and left unprotected. Only people that have been arrested or have a record of violence actives for example, murder, robbery and domestic violence should be the people with gun control laws covering them. There should be criminal control, not gun control. In the year 1996 the U.S. Justice Department estimated there were around 660k gang members and almost half so around 310k of these gang members have guns, although gun control laws have already been established in most parts of the U.S. What Happens when those gangs attack good people and they can't protect themselves, good people die. There should not be gun control because even though there are gun control criminals will always have a way to get guns such as through the black market where people make guns and sell them illegally. The vast majority of people buy guns for protection and self-defense along with Hunting depending on what you want out of your firearm. In 1856 the Supreme Courts have ruled that the government does not have a specific duty to protect individuals. In the U.S.