Preview

Steven Truscott: Miscarriage of Justice

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Steven Truscott: Miscarriage of Justice
Courtney White
Mrs. Schweitzer
CLU 3M
December 8 2013
Steven Truscott: Miscarriage of Justice
“The only two people that know I am innocent, is myself and the killer.” Imagine being blamed for a crime you did not commit, and nobody would believe you no matter what you said. Steven Truscott had forty-two years of his life taken from him for being charged with a crime he did not commit. He was charged at only the age of fourteen for murdering and raping twelve year old Lynne Harper. He then became the youngest death-row inmate after one of the most famous trials in the history of Canada. Steven Truscott should never have been convicted for the murder and rape of Lynne Harper due to the fact the forensic evidence was questionable the witnesses were untrustworthy and the investigation was insufficient.
The evidence that had been used at the trial in 1959 against Steven Truscott was very questionable. Police immediately accused Steven Truscott- a boy with no criminal record or no history of violence. Steven was the last person to be seen with Lynne Harper. So therefore, according to the police logic, he must have raped and killed her. The police did not even bother checking up on local sex offenders in the area or verify if it was one of them. Clearly they did not have enough evidence in 1959 because in 2006 they found new evidence on the time of her death. In the 3 week hearing about the new evidence they stated that Lynne Harper died between 7:00pm and 7:45pm therefore, the Crown argued that if Ms. Harper died between 7:00pm and 8:00pm that Mr. Truscott was the murderer yet if she died after 8:00pm he was not. Also they found stomach contents that suggest she was killed on the night of June 9th 1959, but they also said the state of her body, the weather conditions and histology, she was killed the night of June 10th 1959. The fact that they did not include these facts in the first trial is very questionable.
A key feature that needs to be strong in a trial, are



Cited: Canada Classic Edition. Timeline of the Truscott Case. 25 November 2013. 26 August 2007 City TV News. The Steven Truscott case Timeline. 19 June 2006. 3 November 2013. Hendley, Nate. Steven Truscott and the Death Penalty. Crime Story. 29 January 2010. 24 October 2013. Ontario Justice Education Network Timeline Events for the Steven Truscott Case. November 2 2013 Patrick, K. I lied at Truscott trial, witness allegedly said. National Post 23 October 2013. Sher, Julian. Last Chance for Justice PorchlightCanada for the Missing and Unidentified Canadian Crime> Steven Truscott. 14 July 2006. October 24 2013

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This aboriginal man claimed to have been there the night of the murder and testifies that Tshuanahusset was the one that murdered William Robinson. Yet, he did not firsthand see Tshuanahusset kill William Robinson, nor did he immediately report him for the murder either. It was fifteen months before Sue Tas went to the authorities with information on the murder, and this rose no suspicion for neither the authorities nor the judicial system. The fact that Sue Tas waited this long to inform the authorities rises suspicion that perhaps he was lying because there was belief that Sue Tas was Tshuanahusset killed. Although this suspicion was out in the open, the authorities and judicial system still solely relied on Sue Tas as the only witness and did not look further into these circumstances. This could have simply been that Sue Tas saw the opportunity to pin an open case murder on Tshuanahusset which would explain why he reported him much later from when the murder actually occurred. Also, Sue Tas was threatened by his own tribe and chief after he went to the authorities and reported Tshuanahusset. This information was set aside by all authorities because they simply did not want to complicate the investigation and close it as soon as possible. This information could have meant that Sue Tas did something that was unforgivable by his tribe and this would not be revealing information, but perhaps this could be that he lied about the information to falsely convict Tshuanahusset. Furthermore, the complication of Sue Tas as the only witness should have encouraged authorities and the judicial system to look further into the murder case of William Robinson and not solely rely on one witness, yet through they perfunctory behaviour they closed the case quickly and…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steven Truscott's Case

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Steven Truscott was a Canadian man. He was born in Vancouver, British Columbia. He was sentenced for death in 1959 for the murder of Lynne Harper. His death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment and he continued to maintain his innocence until 2007, when his conviction was declared a miscarriage of justice and he was formally acquitted of the crime. Truscott was scheduled to be hanged. On December 8, 1959; however, a temporary reprieve on November 20, 1959 postponed his execution to February 16, 1960 to allow for an appeal. On January 22, 1960, his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. On November 29, 2001, Truscott filed a section 690 Criminal code application for a review of his 1959 murder conviction. Hearings…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) The media comes up with their own ideas on the case and sways everyone else's opinion and half of the information stated is false. The media should not play a role in the legal system and it should be left to the court. I don't think we should tell the media as much as we do because they tend to sway opinions.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lizzie Borden

    • 2502 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On the day of April fourth, 1892, a husband and wife were murdered with an axe in Fall Rivers, Massachusetts. With no witnesses to the murder, it is hard to find who the murderer of this case was. With some suspicion, circumstantial evidence, and inconsistent answers this case could have been overcome to figure out who the killer really is. Lizzie Borden, the Daughter of Andrew Jackson Borden, was accused of murdering her father and step-mother, Abby Durfee Gray Borden. Without any direct evidence, meaning evidence that can be shown and is not just inferred, pointing to Lizzie for this murder, she was found not guilty by the jury. This case came down to only the circumstantial evidence, meaning evidence that can be inferred, which in my eyes is enough to prove that Lizzie was indeed the murderer. With all of the odd happenings that in some way linked to Lizzie, this case should have ended with her behind bars. This trial lasted from June fifth to June twentieth of 1893 and still to this day this “miscarriage of justice” is looked upon as a great historical trial (Dershowitz 187). To this day people are convinced that Lizzie is the murderer of her father and her step-mother and that she got away clean with nothing but a little song written about her. “Lizzie Borden took an axe, and gave her mother forty whacks. When she saw what she had done, she gave her father forty-one.” A look at the circumstantial evidence will show you, that Lizzie Borden is guilty of murdering her father and step-mother but “the sheer brutality of the murders was enough to convince most people that no woman could have been responsible for such crimes” (Hixson 8).…

    • 2502 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Innocent until proven guilty”, one of the most well-known quotes heard in media coverage on some of the highest profiled cases trial in the United State Courts System. Acquiring the comfort to know that everyone is assumed innocent until evidence proves otherwise can only be done knowing that all evidence would be collected to the fullest of the law and in the best upheld standers of the court system. The integrity of the evidence is what balance’s out the outcome of all criminal cases and the integrity of the first responder as well as that of the police department. If anything everyone present at a crime scene is responsible during the collected evidences. From the moment it was discover until the scene is cleared. Identifying evidence has it challenges because evidence can be everything within the proximity of a crime scene or many miles or continents away. Distance and jurisdiction alone is difficult to uphold and control. Properly identifying, collecting, and processing the evidence is what makes a…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bibliography: 1. Kerr, Margaret, JoAnn Kurtz, and Olivo Laurence M.Canadian Tort Law. 3rd. Canada: Thomson Reuters, 2009. Print.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most think that the justice system gets it right most of the time. Unfortunately this is not the case. Many people go to prison or end up on death row despite being innocent, like Anthony Graves. In 48 Hour’s “Grave Injustice” we see Anthony Graves’ case; Graves was put on death row for a crime he did not commit. In this case like many others out there the fault is not in the system itself but the people. In the Graves case there were many discrepancies that came to light after the conviction..…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Earl Jones Ponzi Scheme

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Andrew, C. B. (2010). Canada update-highlights of major legal news and significant court cases from january 2010 through april 2010. Law and Business Review of the Americas, 16(3), 603-612. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/759759421?accountid=3455…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hey Now

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jennifer Thomson’s main argument and theme that she brings up in all of her lectures are that of capital punishment. She does not believe that capital punishment should be legal, especially after what happened to the man she accused of committing the rape against her. Jennifer states that capital punishment is unacceptable because sometimes the criminal is innocent; like Ronald Cotton. She argues that if capital punishment was a law in North Carolina at the time, that he would have been put to death, a man who had not committed any crimes or done anything wrong would be put to death. She stated that our criminal justice program does make mistakes, and we cannot afford to make those mistakes with people’s lives by ending them.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever heard of the court system acquitting someone that the public unanimously believed was guilty? Casey Anthony was a young mother who appeared outwardly to be a promiscuous woman who was living life with a rough childhood behind her. She appeared like a normal young person, trying to find herself, until she was accused of the murder of her two-year-old daughter, Caylee Anthony. An abundance of evidence, holes in her story, and the lack of concern in Anthony’s attitude lead the world to undoubtedly point fingers at her.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    criminology

    • 2197 Words
    • 9 Pages

    It is with great expectation that society as a whole believe that the criminal justice system is a fair and effective system. The system obtains evidence for guilt which is seen to be overwhelming and clearly more convincing than the defendants claim to innocence.(Walker,1993) However in recent years some court cases have not been subject to this as miscarriages of justices have occurred. A ‘miscarriage of justice’ can be defined as a failure to attain the desired end-result of ‘justice’. (Walker,1993) With the expectation of justice in the democratic society we live in today, the states role should treat individuals with equal respect for their rights and for the rights of others. However in the system we use Packer (1969) gives the alternative view and recognizes that the possibility of human fallibility and error can thereby yield grave injustice. (Packer,1969) Giving an indication as to why sometimes miscarriages of justices can occur due to the setup of the way we convict defendants. There are many factors that enable miscarriages of justice, and therefore must be evaluated as to why miscarriages arise in the criminal justice system, and how it should and has responded in the past. This being barriers that impact on a fair trial, flaws evidential sufficiency, politics, race, media, or even the legal institutions itself such as the police.…

    • 2197 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, the reader learns from Steve Harmon’s experiences that sometimes guilt or innocence of a person might not be determined by solid evidence but by onlooker’s opinions and interpretation of the crime. There is not a large amount of scientific evidence in the case against Steve Harmon, so the jury must rely on Steve’s background information, their opinions of guilt and innocence, and the testimonies of the witnesses who are mostly criminals.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Conviction

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Looking at the death penalty system in action, it is fundamentally flawed in use and there is a serious risk of executing innocent people. Many unjust convictions have shown that serious flaws such as: Lack of eyewitness identification, False confessions, and the access to have DNA testing have caused our countries criminal justice system to convict many innocent individuals, who were sentenced to death.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    McLachlin, B. (2004, June 7). Judges of the Court. Retrieved from Supreme Court of Canada: www.scc-csc.gc.ca…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays