Preview

Guilt Or Innocence In Monster, By Walter Dean Myers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guilt Or Innocence In Monster, By Walter Dean Myers
In Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, the reader learns from Steve Harmon’s experiences that sometimes guilt or innocence of a person might not be determined by solid evidence but by onlooker’s opinions and interpretation of the crime. There is not a large amount of scientific evidence in the case against Steve Harmon, so the jury must rely on Steve’s background information, their opinions of guilt and innocence, and the testimonies of the witnesses who are mostly criminals. From Steve’s trial, the reader learns that a persons guilt or innocence is often determined by their status in life, even by coincidence. In a journal one of Steves entries he ponders, “What did I do? Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around. Is that what I’m

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Steve always changes his story, telling the jury one thing but writing something else in his notebook. While on the stand, his lawyer begins to question him: “O’Brien: ‘Mr. Harmon, were you in the drugstore owned by Mr. Nesbitt, the victim, on the 22nd of December of last year?’ Steve: ‘No, I was not’”(223).…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve experiences an internal conflict regarding the way in which he wishes to be acknowledged. In chapter five, within Steve's journal, we see Steve experiencing this desire to be seen as a good person. "...What did I do? Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around. Is that what I am on trial for? I didn't do nothing!..." (P. 115) Here he proclaims is innocence in his jorunal. In chapter three, Steve has to deal with some strong prejudicial stereotypes that may affect jurors. For example, O' Brien's words to him are "...You're young, you're black, and you're on trial. What else do they need to know?..." (P. 78-9). Here she is saying that the jury is pre-judging him before the case is over and nothing so far is evidence as to him being innocent. Steve's sense of his self-identity is further strained when he realizes that his father is no longer sure of who he is. When Steve asks his father if he believes that Steve did nothing wrong, the father is unable to give him the reassurance he…

    • 738 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This summer I read a book called Monster. The author is Walter Dean Myers. I was reading through the titles of books i could of read and when i saw Monster it reminded me that people told me it was 10/10. I never like the books i read but i know for sure that this book was the best book i have ever read!!!! Even though i only read like 4 book’s in my life but trust me i know it most more than just good.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monster

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How would you like to be on trial for something you didn’t do? In Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon is on trial for felony murder. I believe that Steve Harmon is innocent because he didn’t know Bobo Evans, the store wasn’t clear, and there was no signal.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    guilt in frankenstein

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    English 3 Honors 16 October 2013 Guilt in Frankenstein Guilt plays a major role in the story Frankenstein. Victor feels guilty for the deaths of William, Justine, and Henry. Guilt can be seen through the monster when he kills William, and Justine was forced to believe she was guilty in some way for the death of William.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel, Steve struggles with the thought of himself as a monster. Most people around him think he is guilty, he starts out in court admitting to what he does but nobody believes him. If he was to have killed the clerk he would have admitted it. Nobody wants to believe him just because he is black and he starts to think is he really a monster. “Maybe I could make my own movie. I could write it down and play it in my head. I could block out the scenes like we did in school. The film will be the story of my life. no , not my life, but of this experience. I'll write it down in the notebook they let me keep. I'll call it what the lady who is the prosecutor called me MONSTER.” Before they even started the whole court scene the prosecutor was already calling him a monster. This scene shows what people really think of him and why he is questioning himself. “He has been found not guilty. Steve turn toward O’BRIEN as camera closes in and film grows grainer. STEVE spreads his arms to hug O’BRIEN, but she stiffens and turns to pick up her papers from the table before them.”(p,276) This scene shows how the lawyer thinks Steve is really a monster. By the lawyer not hugging him shows that the lawyer only won the case because it's her job not because she wanted, or even believed, Steve innocent. She bassically said “i'm not hugging you, you're a…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sixteen-year-old Steve is on trial for murder. But he's having trouble understanding why. "What did I do? I walked into a drugstore to look for some mints, and then I walked out. What was wrong with that? I didn't kill Mr. Nesbitt"(p. 140). Nothing is wrong with that, of course--unless the purpose of that casual trip was to give the "all clear" for a robbery that ended in the murder of the store's owner. Then, something is very wrong. Like his character, Walter Dean Myers grew up in New York. As a young man, he struggled with a speech impediment that caused many of his classmates and teachers to ridicule him and think him unintelligent. Myers often got into trouble at school and on the streets when trying to defend himself against the ridicule, causing many to label him a “Monster” (hence the name of his memoir), much like Steve Harmon was labeled a "monster." Later, while working as a construction worker, Myers decided to follow advice given to him by his high school writing teacher and began writing at night after work, just as the character Steve Harmon writes throughout the novel.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Csi Effect

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to accurately depict how the CSI Effect strongly influences our society’s view on crime and courtroom proceedings, I will be comparing different CSI episodes to those methods and theories which apply. Throughout the paper, I will be explaining how CSI has shaped peoples’ minds in believing false claims and investigation beliefs. Watching and comparing episodes of CSI to the CSI Effect will be a prime reference in explaining how the media is placing a spin on CSI television shows.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is more evidence suggesting of Steve’s misconduct then of his innocence. Testimonies of other convicted criminals, Steve’s own thoughts and words, and his lawyer show strongly suggesting signs of Steve’s wrongdoing. Though he might not have been convicted, Steve Harmon is truly guilty of felony…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Criminals are tried in our court system everyday for crimes they are accused of committing. In these court cases, witnesses are called to give an account of what happened in the particular incident and then a jury of twelve members decides the criminal's ruling on the case. The jury does not listen to just one witness; it takes into account the stories of many witnesses in order to decipher the truth. "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin and "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson show one cannot fully rely on what other people say in certain situations.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men “Reasonable Doubt” Theme The play, “Twelve Angry Men” is of how there could’ve been flaws in the Judicial system; however one juror tries to prove that the man isn’t guilty and persuades the others to follow his reasoning. One of the many themes is reasonable doubt, meaning a doubt of the guilt in a criminal due to lack of evidence or thorough examination. Reginald Rose feels that reasonable doubt is often portrayed in many real life juries partly because of testimonies, lawyers, consideration, and facts or opinions.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We know that Steve was in the store the day of the killing, and that he had discussed his role with James King. Steve says he did not signal the others, they say he did. We are never shown directly what happened when Steve emerged from the store. Steve's own father and his defence attorney both seem to have doubts about his innocence. Under the law, if he conspired with others to commit a felony (the robbery), and someone dies in the course of that felony (no matter how the death occurs), all of the conspirators may be guilty of felony murder. So there are hints that he may be guilty.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steve Harmon Case

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of The State of New York vs. Steve Harmon the examination of flashbacks, journal entries, and tried testimony’s proves that Steve Harmon is guilty in the robbery and felony murder of Mr. Nesbitt. During the testimony of Sawicki, the prosecutor asks him if Steve attended film club on the afternoon of December 22nd Sawicki responds with, “No, he did not”. Steve not going to film club on the day of the robbery brings up suspicion, the Jury can imply that he goes to film club all the time and he just “happened” to not be there on the day of the robbery. The Unknown is where was he, that is the Jury’s decision on where he “was”. While Steve was in his cell, in his journal he writes, ”I thought about writing about what happened in the…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black people back then weren't treat right. Steve was accused of being the murder because he is black and any black person would do that. For example, the story says, “ Do you think I should have got a black lawyer?” she asked. “ Some of…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monster O Brien Summary

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    O’Brien and Harmon: Is it Race? Monster presents its audience with a unique experience: they get to decide the fate of the main character by being presented with the facts, before the judge presents the final sentencing. It is a story of racism and class and how that affects the judicial system. The idea maybe innocent until proven guilty, but in many cases of African Americans on trial, the sentence is often decided before the trial begins. This conflict of race not only applies to the person on trial and the judicial courtroom, but can find itself with the lawyers that defend them. At the end of Monster, Steve Harmon’s lawyer, Kathy O’Brien, turns away from Steve after he has been found innocent of murder. We, as the readers, are never…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics