Preview

Soft Determinism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1913 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Soft Determinism
Determinism currently takes two related forms: hard determinism and soft determinism [1][1]. Hard determinism claims that the human personality is subject to, and a product of, natural forces. All of our choices can be accounted for by reference to environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary (biological) causes. Our total character is a product of these environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary forces, thus our beliefs, desires, values and habits are all outside of our control. The hard determinist, therefore, claims that our choices are determined by these factors; free will is an illusion because the choices and decisions we make are derived from our character, which is completely out of our control in creating. An example might help illustrate this point. Consider a man who has just repeatedly stabbed another man outside of a bar; the other man is dead. The hard determinist would argue that there were factors outside of the killer's control which led him to this action. As a child, he was constantly beaten by his father and was the object of ridicule and contempt of his classmates. This trend of hard luck would continue all his life. Coupled with the fact that he has a gene that has been identified with male aggression, he could not control himself when he pulled the knife out and started stabbing the other man. All this aggression, and all this history were the determinate cause of his action. Soft determinism touts itself as a looser form of determinism; it maintains that a modicum of freedom can exist within determinism. For the soft determinist, the personality or character of the agent is still derived from environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary factors. The agent's actions are still a result of this character. However, the soft determinist maintains that we are free because freedom is not a freedom from all causes but is a freedom from some causes. One might argue that there was no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    "There is a continuum between free and unfree, with many or most acts lying somewhere in between." (Abel, 322) This statement is a good summation of how Nancy Holmstrom 's view of free will allows for degrees of freedom depending on the agent 's control over the situation. Holmstrom 's main purpose in her Firming Up Soft Determinism essay was to show that people can have control over the source of their actions, meaning that people can have control over their desires and beliefs, and because of this they have free will. She also tried to show that her view of soft determinism was compatible with free will and moral responsibility. While Holmstrom 's theory about the self 's being in control, willingness to participate, and awareness of an act causes the act to be free, has some merit, her choice to incorporate soft determinism ultimately proved to invalidate her theory.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem that Taylor finds with Soft Determinism is that it does not allow us to be completely free. In soft determinism, Taylor believes that if a person says the action is free than it also means that they could have acted differently. Taylor’s alternative is the theory of agency (self-determinism). The theory of agency (self-determinism) means that the person causes the free actions and it is not caused by something inside the person but by the whole person. I believe Taylor’s alternative has some problems. I am not exactly sure if I understand this theory. On page 134, Taylor states that the data “rest upon nothing more than fairly common consent. These data might simply be illusions”. I do not exactly understand how this works. But…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The stereotypical definition of determinism, to the layman, goes something like this: "All events are predetermined so we have no free will." Actually, this is more or less the definition of hard determinism. Determinism, however, according to professor of philosophy Sandra LaFave, can co-exist with free will in the form of soft determinism, the philosophical theory that all events indeed have causes but that humans can still act voluntarily. Soft determinism provides a more widely-acceptable definition of determinism that agrees more with common usage of the words "free will" and "cause."…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate between freewill and determinism stems from the apparent conflict between the universal rule of causality that is deeply rooted in nature, and between the apparent ability of human beings to choose between multiple courses of action in order to lead to the most desirable outcome. The universal rule of causality simply claims that inorganic matter such as tables, chairs and rocks are acted upon by whatever forces affect it, however, human beings seem to be an exception to this rule by their unique ability to ponder about how to go about making decisions in their life and which…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People make assumptions that they are free, in the sense that supports moral responsibility. People also believe that everything that has happened to them is caused. The conflict between the freewill and causation assumption causes the problem of freewill. Soft determinism is the compatibilist explanation, which believes determinism and freewill can be both true. Ayer defends this view in the article “Freedom and Necessity.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The same people who believe that they are freely making choices also believe that the world has come to the point it is at because of past events. The world is a giant web of causes and effects. Hard determinists argue that because everything has a cause, no decision is made freely. Instead, every choice and action ever made is the result of a preceding event or events that led to the action. Advocates of libertarian free will explain this by noting the difference between the events of the world from events in the mind, or thoughts. Events that occur in the world are deterministic, with everything having a cause and effect. Libertarian free will draws the line at the human mind. It says that the mind makes its own decisions and create an entirely new set of causes in the physical world. This debate begins to focus on whether or not the human mind is capable of making its own decisions, something to which new technology and science are giving new insight. For the past 50 years or so, neuroscience has come to the conclusion that the brain does not make its own decisions, but uses past events and experiences to determine which action is…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Well, breaking it down that is not what free will defines. Free will is the ability to make his or her own decision. To some extent determinism (not to be confused with hard determinism) and free will can both collaborate together making our world. Yes, something had to create us, but when we are born we are born with a desire to follow our hearts. We are designed to have our own free will. Although it may seem like hard determinism derails free will's argument it is an incorrect accusation at a completely different topic not in relation to free will. If we used hard determinism, that would mean that no one is held accountable to their actions or morals. With their philosophy it would mean that everything was planned out and whatever happens was planned to happen. So with that in mind it does not matter if I steal because it was supposed to happen, etc. I believe God gave us free will to further the Kingdom of God, and because He wants us to choose Him, not be forced to love…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Determinism

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hard determinists hold that if every human action is caused then humans cannot have free will in regards to the choices that we make. Determinism and free will are incompatible theories. If humans have free will then they have the power to properly choose between two actions as an extension of their will; they must to be able to do or choose the reciprocal with equal ability. Hard determinism does not argue that we do not make choices; no hard determinist would refute this obvious fact. But they bring to question whether our reasoning behind the choices is free will, or causally…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every idea gives some food for thought and analysis. Determinism is very interesting, as well as being a very complicated topic. I think, determinists fail to prove one hundred percent that “everything is predictable, including the process of making decisions, and that a decision does not occur as a first cause but rather as a result of the predetermined criteria for a specific decision to be made having been met.”(4) Still, there is a lot of truth in their point of view. Even though, scientists have made many sensational discoveries about the human body and brain, they are still far from knowing everything. Determinists can only try to explain some human behavior, but fail to establish correlation between cause and event. I won’t be surprised that one day scientists will be able to explain why some individuals become criminals, and will be able to prove that an individual with some genes is programmed to kill, steal, or abuse, and is therefore not responsible for his or her actions. As it hasn’t happened yet, the “principle of justice” must be applied to all individuals who break the…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So the implication of hard determinism being true is simply that, there is no free will. But the opponents will defend vehemently that there is free will. And the first objection that they will bring to prove that there is free will is that man has the ability to step back from decisions that he has already made and do something different. This seemingly indicates that not all of human decisions are determined and man has free will. But in response to this, the hard determinist will say that since man is a reasonable human being, after carefully considering a situation, he might find something beneficial in not acting according to his initial impulse. He might decide to change his first choice because he has a new motivation, a new idea, which modifies the brain to reconsider the initial choice. And the brain gives him a new impulse by which the action of the former impulse is suspended. Let me clarify my stance with an example. Suppose a man…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various philosophers have explained iterations of free will in more depth, resulting in a greater number of issues connected to it. When arguing against free will, the concept of determinism is advanced as the main argument. Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision, and action, is predetermined. The main perceived threats to our freedom of will are various alleged determinisms. These can be physical, psychological, biological or theological in nature. For example, suppose you meet a person you are instantly attracted to. Practically every thought and emotion in your body commands you to approach the person but for various reasons you hold back; the moment doesn't feel right.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perspectives, Psychology

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The freewill versus determinism debate refers to the question of whether a person has control their over behaviour and understands the motives behind it (freewill), or if their behavior is determined by some force over them and have no control (Determinism), such as their genetics or upbringing. Although they are both very different perspectives believe both nature and nurture to play an important role in the development of someone’s personality and behavior. Psychoanalysts tend to believe in determinism, as a result of perceived unconscious influences on the character, and humanists believe in free will.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other theories about how humans make decisions are hard determinism and soft determinism. Hard determinism describes the decision-making process based solely on determinism and not free will; whereas, soft determinism is uses both determinism and free will as its support. These other theories about free will both use the idea of determinism as a main source of support for decision-making. Not using determinism is a spurious negative of the theory of libertarianism, because it does not allow prior factors to have any impact on decision-making.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays