Preview

Social Facilitation Experiment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Facilitation Experiment
ABSTRACT
The study us experimenters re-conducted was based on Norman Triplett’s study of social facilitation and how social presence or encouragement improves an individual’s speed and consistency in their performance.
The experiment was replicated in using several trials for accurate results and was split into two stages: a mental challenge and a physical challenge. The two male and two female participants ranged from ages 15 to 17 years old.
For the mental challenge, each participant was pulled aside one at a time to match 22 flashcards as fast as possible by themselves. The results recorded were the times each individual person took to match all 22 cards. Afterwards, each participant was given the same instruction to match the set of
…show more content…
Design
The replicated experiment is designed for each participant to be in experimental and control groups. The experimental condition was in an outdoor location. This design was chosen because it was necessary to have each person experience solitary conditions to better emphasize and create a bigger impact of the effect another person’s presence had on performance. Repeated trials and measures ensure a decrease in experimental error due to participants’ personal characteristics. One of the controlled characteristics was age (15-17),
In regarding ethical terms, a briefing was given to the participants as well as a consent form. The experiment was only conducted after the consent forms were signed. We realized the great importance of not physically or mentally harming the participants, leading us to conduct the experiment with caution to ensure no damage like this occurred.
B. Participants
The target group of people consisted of 4 participants ranging from ages 15-17, two male and two female. The 4 participants were in both control and experimental conditions.
To obtain the results, we tested the performance of the participants mentally and physically solitarily at first, and then again with a partner.
C.
…show more content…
Procedure
First, consent forms were released to the 4 chosen participants requiring both parent and teacher signatures. Those who chose not to participate were not forced to have their consent forms signed. A week after the release of the consent forms, the signed forms were collected and we started our experiment.
Each individual person was taken away from the group to be experimented on. Each participant was told that they were to flip over and match the 22 flashcards two at a time as fast as they could while we timed them. When they finished, we stopped the stopwatch and recorded their time.
After all participants finished the mental experimentation, they were again individually taken away from the group to be physically experimented on. They were told that they were given 5 minutes to shoot the basketball as many times as they could. After 5 minutes, the participants were told to stop as we counted the number of shots made.
After both experimentations, we repeated the mental challenge once again but this time with a partner. They were still given 22 flashcards to match two at a time as fast as they could while we recorded them. Once all the cards were matched, we stopped the timer and recorded their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of posttest only design and pretest-posttest design 3. What is meant by sensitivity of a dependent variable? 4. What are the differences between an independent groups design and a repeated measures design? 5. How does an experimenter’s expectations and participant expectations affect outcomes? 6. Provide an example of a factorial design. What are the key features of a factorial design? What are the advantages of a factorial design? 7. Describe at least four different dependent variables. 8. What are some ways researchers can manipulate independent variables? 9. What is the difference between main effects and interactions?…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Following the task, participants were (unexpectedly) given a list of 180 words, which contained the original 60 words processed and 120 'filler' words, and were asked to identify the ones they recognised from the original 60 (the dependent variable).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bitchess Trippin

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Seminar Teaching Assistants Name Anne Marie Levy Thomas Sasso Jasmine Mahdy Melissa Bell Chris Upton Dan van der Werf Jeff Franson Julia Wreford Course overview Description: The overall theme of this course is the examination of human behaviour and mental processes using a scientific approach. It will survey some of the major areas of the field such as neuroscience, sensation and perception, learning, cognition, motivation, human development, personality, psychopathology, and social psychology. Lectures: Seminars: Tuesdays & Thursdays 16:30-17:20, Rozanski Hall (ROZH) 104 As assigned on your timetable. • You must attend the seminar for which you are registered, unless you made arrangements with your TA to attend another one of his/her seminars. • PSYC*1000*XXXX, where XXXX is your seminar section number Seminar Sections 0464, 0465, 0479, 0480 0461, 0467 0463, 0470 0471, 0478 0466, 0474 0472, 0473 0462, 0468 0469 E-mail a.levy@psy.uoguelph.ca t.sasso@psy.uoguelph.ca j.mahdy@psy.uoguelph.ca mbell01@uoguelph.ca c.upton@psy.uoguelph.ca d.vanderwerf@psy.uoguelph.ca j.franson@psy.uoguelph.ca j.wreford@psy.uoguelph.ca…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This experiment speaks to the 'nature of responsibility' and to see if the subject will stop the experiment…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original experiment used children age three to seven as subjects but in different groups. The children were led into a room; empty of distractions, with a marshmallow was placed on a table, by a chair.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz 8

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. Research participants who worked alongside someone who rubbed his or her face or shook his or her foot were observed to do the same thing themselves. This best illustrated: (Points : 1)…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the ethics of Milgram's obedience study. In the years 1961-1962, Stanley Milgram - Yale University psychologist, conducted the first of the obedience experiments, which were also called "shock" studies. The research was invented to check if the people would be ready to harm somebody just to meet the requirements of the experiment. This essay will be focused on the ethical side of the study.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline and assess the use of experiments in social psychology drawing on the cognitive social perspective and phenomenological perspective.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Participants were awarded partial credit and five dollars. All participants shot all their shots on a regulation basketball hoop in a hardwood gym with a regulation basketball. Participants watched one of three videos which were stated earlier. The first video is a positive stereotype video contained six clips of white NBA players making free throws. The second video which was the negative stereotype video also showed six clips but of black NBA players making free throws. Both videos quoted players to make 85% of their shots. The third video which was used as the control showed six clips of MLS players scoring penalty kicks.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    scales. They were told that they were participating in an ongoing experiment to study the…

    • 971 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this experiment was to find how previous experiences and events affect your perception . The procedure of this replicated experiment was gathering 15 people and separating them into 3 groups. Participants were separated into groups called “people group”, “animal group” and the “control group.” The independent variable of this experiment is the type of images placed on the sheets of paper that the participants were given. The dependent variable was what the participant saw in result of what was on their papers.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    clothespin

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The materials I used in this experiment were 8 people (subjects) and 8 clothespins of the same type. First I recognized my dependent variable, how many times you can squeeze clothespin, and my independent, exercise. I took a group of 8 classmates, excluding myself and instead including my younger brother. I decided to let the control group also serve as the experimental group. The steps I took were to let the control group rest before starting, and then they squeezed the clothespin for one minute and counted how many times they could squeeze it. After that they rested for another minute, then exercised by jogging in place for one minute and after they immediately squeezed the clothespin.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To investigate the effects of exercise on mathematical problem-solving ability, a researcher assigned subjects to one of two groups. One group did 50 jumping jacks and the other group did 200. After exercising, both groups did a set of math problems.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Section 1: Social facilitation is influence observers have on peoples or animal’s behaviors (Myers, 2009). When we are being observed doing a complicated task, we tend to perform worse because the presence of others makes us nervous. On the other hand though if we are performing a simple task we perform better and faster than usual in front of an audience (Janowsky, 2010). When a pianist for instance is attempting to learn a new piece in the presence of his classmates, he is more likely to learn more slowly than if he were practicing alone at home. But if this were a piece he had been playing for years, he would play more beautifully in the presence of his audience than if he were alone at home. Social loafing is the difference of someone’s personal performance when he is in a group or alone. Research has shown that when in a group people tend to perform at lower levels than when being rated individually (Myers, 2009). Harkins & others 1980 tug-of-war experiment for example proves that each contestant pulls harder when he thinks he is pulling alone, but not as hard when he sees himself in a group (Myers, 2009). This can also be called free-riding because the individual is leaving more work up to the team than he should. Free-riding is often seen in class projects, when one or two teammates leave the majority of the assigned work for the others to do (Janowsky, 2010).…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays