Skepticism Vs Foundationalism

I believe that Foundationalism has a better chance of dealing with Mike’s case about skepticism. Foundationalism can prove everything based on facts and evidence. For example, in the story a skeptic could say, “how do you know that what we experience is real?” and a foundationalist will keep giving reasons such as the fact that we are talking right now, and so on. In relation to the story, one might say, “how do you know that Mike’s brain isn’t in a vat?” and the foundationalist replies by using facts, like no one saw them dissecting his brain, or that he is here right now. I believe that the skeptic questions of “how do you know…?” are not backed up by any evidence because they reach into possibilities and what ifs, but a foundationalist could