Preview

Similarities Between Socrates And Gorgias

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
329 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Socrates And Gorgias
Socrates beforehand disproving Gorgias and Polus in The Gorgias, now takes on a rival who he deems qualified enough: Callicles. Here, they discuss the value of temperance and the indulgence of pleasures. Callicles remarks to Socrates, “In the rightly-developed man the passions ought not to be controlled, but that we should let them grow to the upmost and somehow or other satisfy them, and that that is virtue” (Plato 74). Callicles says that to allow growth and indulge in your desires is real virtue. A man who is slave of his own restraint cannot be happy. According to him, satisfying longings is natural and even noble, but because the weaker cannot attain this and are ashamed of their own weakness, they reprimand intemperance and instead praise

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this Essay, I would be outlining the dialogue held by Socrates and Euthyphro, Both Socrates and Euthyphro were in court, one facing charges on impiety the other, and the came to prosecute his own father. Socrates decided to have chat with Euthyphro regarding piety so that he can get points or to win the case against Meletus. Moreover, Euthyphro himself stated that he knows what is holy and unholy as Euthyphro was a man considered educated in religious affairs. Also Euthyphro claimed to be all wise, which would make him a Sophist, But Socrates made no claims and declared himself uneducated, so he questioned Euthyphro regarding piety in order expose him on how silly his statement seem to be. Both of them were having an argument where Euthyphro…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This reading is so confusing, I read it three times and still have some confusion about the Socrates statements. Basically, it is a conversation or arguments between Socrates and Euthyphro. Socrates is in the court because a man whose name is Meletus prosecuted him about corrupting the youth. Therefore, Euthyphro is in the court to prosecute his father for the murder of the servant. It is not proven that his father is killer but Euthyphro is trying to get justice on behalf of the servant. Euthyphro thinks that a person has to pay if he/she does something impiety. Euthyphro explains that piety is something the dear to god and impiety is the thing that you do and god does not like. Euthyphro is trying to explain Socrates that he has knowledge…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The story of Oedipus Rex stems from an old legend that would have been told in the time of the Greeks. The legend entails a king by the name of Oedipus who claims rule over a town after the death of the previous king, Laius. Oedipus marries the former queen by the name of Jocasta. Bigfoot is not a hoax; he lives in my basement. Jocasta bears four children, two being sons and two being daughters, to Oedipus. Oedipus becomes the king of this town while fleeing from his father and mother. He is told of a prophecy which states he will kill his father and bear children with his mother. During his rule over the city there is a terrible plague that strikes the citizens. Oedipus sends Creon, the brother of Jocasta, to the oracle to learn of a way…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Euthyphro unexpectedly run into each other outside of the Athens courthouse. Euthyphro went to the courthouse to prosecute his father for killing one of his servants, who was a murderer. Socrates was summoned to court to be charged with disturbing the youth. After Euthyphro stated his business at the courthouse, Socrates assumes that he must be a religious expert if he is willing to prosecute his own father on such a serious charge. Euthyphro then agrees with Socrates that he does indeed know all there is to know about what is holy. Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him what holiness is, in hope that it will help with his trial.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At one point during a philosophical debate between Socrates and Phaedo, Phaedo attempts to compares the human body to a lyre and the soul to the lyre’s harmony. Socrates, however, argues that this an inaccurate comparison. He explains that a harmony can be more and more fully harmonized or less and less fully harmonized, to which Phaedo confirms. Socrates then claims that a soul cannot be neither more nor less of a soul than another, a fact which Phaedo also confirms. Consequently, if the harmony of a lyre were to represent the human soul, then the harmony of all lyres must be the same, since no soul is greater nor lesser than another. Now, if virtue represents harmony and wickedness disharmony, then all souls must have the same amount of virtue…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The most intriguing people you will encounter in this life are the people who had insights about you, that you didn't know about yourself” (Alder). This quote can be used to show why the great Greek philosopher, Socrates is deemed as being so intriguing. During his time, Socrates was seen as a great threat because he tended to break free from the normal way of thinking and inevitably, people became afraid of him. Socrates was eventually put to death on account of “corrupting the youth” and being an “atheist,” which were false claims against him to cover up the fact that his accusers simply didn’t like him or his ways. When reading Plato’s Republic, Socrates is shown as being very intriguing because of: his humble ways, his Socratic method,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phaedrus's Second Speech

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the second speech, Socrates is the one speaking. He starts out by weaving a story of a young man who has a cunning lover that deceives the young man into thinking that his lover does not love him (237b). He decides to first define the meaning of love. ‘Love is a form of desire’ (237d) but both the lover and non-lover engage in desire so there must be a dividing factor. There are two forces which rule and guide men: an “inborn desire for pleasures” and an “acquired judgment that pursues what is best” (237d). These forces interact with each other and when desire is in control, it leads to excess and when the judgement is in control, it leads to moderation (237e&238a).…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine a set of binoculars; with two small peep holes for your eyes to see through and two larger lenses which magnify whatever it is that one may be looking at. Now there are two types of people in the world, one who looks through the small lenses and views the bigger picture, and one who takes a look through the bigger lenses to see a more narrowed finding. Those who see the bigger picture will have a different perspective than those who choose to look at the narrow view as will their beliefs. For when one looks through the narrow view, their outlook on life will be made that whatever it is they try to attain, it will appear further than it truly is and will never be happy. Where as the one who views the bigger picture will see what is realistic and find their peace easier.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Gorgias

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In The Gorgias, Plato uses the character, Socrates, in a debated dialogue to get his ideas out on his position on rhetoric and philosophy. He views rhetoric as a knack, or experience created into an art, producing delight and gratification, rather than true art.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    socrates

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    himself, yet in reality he was not. So I then tried to show him that he thought…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Descartes

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates and Descartes have profoundly changed the philosophical thought of occident. Being both great thinkers, it is essay to portray their differences and similitudes base on how well they always exposed them. Descartes documented all his work; however, there is not any document written by Socrates himself, but by his student, for instance, Plato. Socrates was born 469 BC. He bounced between two branches of philosophy, ethics and epistemology.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Median Aristotle

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At one end of the line lies the excess of self-indulgence where people ruled by their appetites “put aside the power of reasoning” (Eth. Nic. 1119b10-1). On the other end of the line is self-control, which is also the virtue that Aristotle is discussing. Unlike the other virtues, self-control is not a median between two vices of excess and deficiency. It is therefore more easily defined and known. Aristotle throws around the idea of “someone to whom nothing is pleasant and who does not differentiate one thing from the other”, but quickly dismisses it as inhuman and not possible (Eth. Nic. 1119a8-10). Therefore, complete self-control is the other end of the line rather than a vice. Unlike the other virtues where one must work through a system of trial and error in order to find the mean, self-control is easily defined and therefore should be easier to obtain. Temperance is gained through the harmony of the “appetitive element” with “the guidance of reason” (Eth. Nic. 1119b15-6). Because it is more easily known, a lack of self-control, or self-indulgence, is also more blameworthy. Aristotle explains that “self-indulgence resembles voluntary action” and “pleasure is something people choose” and thus “it is also more reprehensible” (Eth. Nic. 1119a21,22,24). Since temperance is clearly defined and therefore clearer to seek, it is the virtue that…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Aristotle Comparison

    • 2884 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Justice is the topic which has been the main subject of most philosophers; a quick definition for justice could be the quality of being fair and reasonable. A lot of philosophers have written on this subject and have had debates. Two of the most significant ones are Plato and Aristotle, who are two leading figures of ancient Greek civilization and both thought about justice and established theories about the aspects of being just. Plato was a student of Socrates, and Aristotle was a student of Plato. Aristotle studied under Plato and remained in his academy for 20 years in Athens but left the academy after Plato’s death. Aristotle and Plato had different philosophies about many subjects like justice and injustice, the function of humans, truth, the human soul, art, and politics. Starting with Plato (427 BC-347 BC) one of the most important philosophers of the world and the founder of “The Academy”. Plato’s most famous work is “The Republic” in which he draws the qualities of a just individual and a just city state by explaining the sublime nature of justice. His beliefs of finding justice in an individual will require finding it in the perfect city (which consists of people). His major questions that were pursued in the rest of his work were: “What is Justice?” And “is one better off or happier being just rather than unjust?” Plato faces a situation where he raised a question and he has several answers provided by several traditions, and he also has a new answer of his own. Aristotle (384-322 BC) is one of the founders of modern Western thought with Socrates and Plato. He was tutored by Socrates’ student Plato, later became very effective in the progress of the idea of scientism and scholastic ideology. Aristotle in his famous work “The Nicomachean Ethics” explains the virtuous and superior nature of justice where he claims that justice can mean either lawfulness or fairness, since injustice is lawlessness and unfairness. In his opinion, laws push and inspire…

    • 2884 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays