Preview

Differences Between Euthyphro And Socrates

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Euthyphro And Socrates
This reading is so confusing, I read it three times and still have some confusion about the Socrates statements. Basically, it is a conversation or arguments between Socrates and Euthyphro. Socrates is in the court because a man whose name is Meletus prosecuted him about corrupting the youth. Therefore, Euthyphro is in the court to prosecute his father for the murder of the servant. It is not proven that his father is killer but Euthyphro is trying to get justice on behalf of the servant. Euthyphro thinks that a person has to pay if he/she does something impiety. Euthyphro explains that piety is something the dear to god and impiety is the thing that you do and god does not like. Euthyphro is trying to explain Socrates that he has knowledge
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Euthyphro And Socrates
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Euthyphro And Socrates

    In this Essay, I would be outlining the dialogue held by Socrates and Euthyphro, Both Socrates and Euthyphro were in court, one facing charges on impiety the other, and the came to prosecute his own father. Socrates decided to have chat with Euthyphro regarding piety so that he can get points or to win the case against Meletus. Moreover, Euthyphro himself stated that he knows what is holy and unholy as Euthyphro was a man considered educated in religious affairs. Also Euthyphro claimed to be all wise, which would make him a Sophist, But Socrates made no claims and declared himself uneducated, so he questioned Euthyphro regarding piety in order expose him on how silly his statement seem to be. Both of them were having an argument where Euthyphro…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Piety As Depicted In Plato's Euthyphro
    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Piety As Depicted In Plato's Euthyphro

    In the reading Euthyphro, Plato’s end goal is to show that there is no rational relationship between “the pious” and “to be loved by the Gods.” The point of Socrates argument is that he is ultimately asking Euthyphro to explain piety by questioning the characteristics of something that is loved. Is something loved because it is good, is it loved because it is popular, what makes something loved?…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates 'Dishonesty In Plato's Euthyphro'
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates 'Dishonesty In Plato's Euthyphro'

    that goes by Meletos, who had plans of indicting the philosopher following the claim that he’d been corrupting the youth.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthyphro- Plato
    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthyphro- Plato

    In the writing called Euthyphro by Plato, Socrates is being charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in all of the Gods. He is being accused of this by a man named Meletus who feels as though he is guilty of not believing in the Gods of the states. Not only does he not believe in the Gods but he is accused of making up new ones. The crimes that he is being charged with go hand in hand with each other but he maintains his innocence because he feels he isn’t guilty. While on the other hand Euthyphro is prosecuting his father and indicting him for murder. Morally Euthyphro feels as though it’s the right thing to do and his family doesn’t agree only because it’s his father. In this essay I will summarize the dialogue and its message relating to piety/holiness.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Happened To Socrates Corrupt The Youth?
    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Happened To Socrates Corrupt The Youth?

    He does this by saying that wicked people do harm to the people closest to them while good people do good to those closest to them. Meletus agrees with this which leads Socrates to the point that no person would willingly choose to live among the wicked as it would cause him harm. With this being the case Socrates argues that he cannot be validly charged with willingly corrupting the youth as it would only do he harm. And if he is corrupting the youth, he is not doing it willing. IF this is the case, there is no need for a trial and punishment. Socrates states that if he is unwillingly corrupting the youth, it is necessary to correct him rather than punish him. Socrates gives Meletus too options. Either he is not corrupting the youth (as that would cause him harm, or he is doing it unwillingly. Either way, neither option is a crime worth of death. With this argument, Socrates is able to invalidate the charge of corrupting the youth. It is clear by Socrates description of the wording of the charges that the charges are illogical and serve no basis for a…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro Vs Plato
    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthyphro Vs Plato

    Forum 2: Plato - Holiness and Deities' Approval My initial view on Plato’s argument that what is holy and what is approved by the gods are not the same, is that this argument is convincing. I will also, show that Euthyphro would not have given any reasonable response to the argument in response to the second question and final part of the assignment, which requires if we can think of any arguments Euthyphro could have made and what his response would have been. However, before I delve fully into evaluating and buttressing my position, it is apropos to take a synoptic and retrospective incursion to the genesis of Plato’s conclusion to fully equip us with the historic origin and import of his deductions. In the course…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Euthyphro
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plato's Euthyphro

    Euthyphro's second definition of piety is what is pleasing to the gods. Socrates agrees with this definition because it is expressed in a general form, but criticizes because the gods disagree among themselves as to what is right. This would mean that a particular action, disputed by the gods, would be both pious and impious at the same time and this is a logically impossible situation. Euthyphro tries to argue against Socrates' criticism by pointing out that not even the gods would disagree amongst themselves that someone who kills without justification should be punished but Socrates argues that disputes would still arise over just how much justification there actually was and therefore the same action could still be both pious and impious. Socrates yet again believes Euthyphro's 'definition' cannot possibly be a definition.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety
    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety

    Piety, says Euthyphro, is what all the gods love, and the impious is what all the gods hate. Socrates is not satisfied by this definition, either, and so he tries a different tack to extract a definition from Euthyphro. Socrates does this by asking: “Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods?” When Euthyphro seems unsure, Socrates simplifies his question with an analogy. He asks Euthyphro if something is “carried” because it is “a thing carried,” or if it is “carried” because something is carrying it. Both men agree that the action confers the state of being. That is, a thing loved is so because someone loves it, and the thing itself is not creating a state of “loving” within the people around it. Likewise, being loved is not a state inherent to the thing loved, but is the result of the love others bear for the thing. Moving from his analogy back to Euthyphro’s definition, Socrates shows the fallacy in Euthyphro’s statement. Being god-loved cannot confer piety, as it confers “god-loved-ness” instead. Therefore, in Euthyphro’s statement, all the gods loving something would make that thing universally god-loved, but in no way makes it pious. An act is loved by the gods because it is pious, and not the other way…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Piety: Pan and the Nymphs
    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Piety: Pan and the Nymphs

    While there are varying characterizations and notions about what constitutes piety, in Euthyphro by Plato, an attempt is made to formulate an ultimate definition for what is pious and what is impious. According to Euthyphro, the most reasonable explanation of piety is tending to the gods, showing reverence and respect for them, or ultimately, doing anything benefitting to the gods. Piety can be narrowed down into simpler terms; it consists of everything that all the gods love, while impiety is everything that all the gods hate. Socrates emphasizes the belief…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Distinctions
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates Distinctions

    The most effective points Marino emphasizes is the distinctions being made in the article. Those distinctions are clarifying everything that Marino is stating about the quotes used and to back up the thesis.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Apology Analysis
    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Apology Analysis

    In the beginning of this section of Apology of Socrates, the jurors find Socrates guilty by a 281 to 220 vote. Socrates begins his next speech by revealing that he is not grieved by this decision, and that he is surprised only by the ratio of guilty to innocent votes, thinking the majority would have been against him. He tells the audience that the proposed penalty is death, yet he does not feel that is fair in his belief that he had never wronged anyone. He believed that what he was doing was a job given to him by God, and that he was instilling, or attempting to instill, the seeking of wisdom and virtue that he thought led a man to righteousness. Socrates then lists all the possible alternatives for penalty, being a fine, imprisonment, or exile. He follows these alternatives with reasons against these, being that he has no money, does not wish to be the slave to magistrates in prison, and will only continue his practices and be exiled at each new place he travels, in that he will not cease his tongue as it would be a disobedience to God. The jurors then vote to condemn Socrates to death, and he retaliates with the stating that he would never act as they wanted him to in order to receive acquittal, and that he would rather be true to himself and die for it. He further explains that he is convinced that death cannot be evil, for the oracle did oppose him from saying any one thing during his trial, as it normally does when something Socrates is about to make an error or slip in any way. Additionally, death can be of two beneficial things, a state of nothingness and unconsciousness compared to a sound sleep, or the migration of the soul to from this world to another, in which Socrates can question and be amongst the heroes of the Greek history. Socrates finishes by asking the jury for one last favor, being that when Socrates sons grow up, he asks for them to be punished if they ever value riches or anything other than virtue, and pretend…

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Piety Is a Part of Justice
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Piety Is a Part of Justice

    Euthyphro’s second definition is that piety is that which is dear to the gods. In other words, actions that are pleasing to the gods are pious, and actions that are displeasing to them are impious. Socrates pretends to be pleased with this definition because Euthyphro seems as if he may have finally provided a model with which to measure all pious things. Euthyphro states that actions being pleasing to the gods provides a standard that should enable everyone to recognize what is pious and what is impious. Socrates reminds him that piety and impiety are not the same thing, they are opposites. The gods do not seem to agree on much of anything, let alone that which is just or good, and certainly that which is pleasing.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Holy Moly
    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Holy Moly

    The story of “Euthyphro” was not one that was easy for me to understand. It took me a lot of reading and re-reading to grasp the concept of what I was to actually reading. It may be Greek, but it was all Chinese to me. It is a dialogue between Socrates, who is on trial for impiety. He is being accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and not believing in the Gods. He runs into his friend Euthyphro, who is prosecuting his father for impiety as well, only his father is on trial for murdering a slave that he didn’t actually murder.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay on Piety
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay on Piety

    In Euthyphro, Plato juxtaposes the predicaments of Socrates and Euthyphro to delve deep into the issues of ethics and justice. On the one hand, Socrates has been indicted for corrupting the youth and ungodliness. On the other hand, Euthyphro has willingly decided to prosecute his father—the equivalent of committing blasphemy—for the crime of murdering a servant. Perplexed by Euthyphro’s decision, Socrates remarks that Euthyphro must have expert wisdom of divine law to take such actions against his own father. Subsequently, Socrates insists that Euthyphro teach him a lesson in piety; he believes that learning Euthyphro’s unquestionable knowledge of piety could help him get acquitted in his trial against Meletus. Through their interaction, Euthyphro presents Socrates with four distinct definitions of piety. Nevertheless, Socrates identifies flaws in each potential definition Euthyphro offers him.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Differences between Plato and Aristotle
    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Differences between Plato and Aristotle

    The current understanding of knowledge and the universe by man today stems from many centuries ago when philosophers attempted to understand the seemingly chaotic world around them. The Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle are responsible for some of these major early discoveries and are a big reason as to where we are today due to their endeavors to understand various philosophical topics. In this essay, I am going to explain Plato’s views on knowledge and science, Aristotle’s views on change and science, and ultimately how although both contributed to man’s understanding of philosophy today, Aristotle started a departure from the views of Plato and into an entirely new era.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More