Preview

Similarities Between Hobbes And Southworth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Hobbes And Southworth
In an attempt to discover who we truly are as a species , one might describe us humans as being creatures driven by passion. Passion is our desires- our very basic human wants and needs that include being able to do anything we want. This is considered to be natural to us and therefore creates our reality. Most people agree that we have to mold ourselves based off of this characteristic, but overall, it should be controlled. In the steps to analyzing the works of Thomas Hobbes and James Southworth, I noticed that they both somewhat believe that in our "natural state" without structure, are always in a state of conflict because there's no foundation either in the mind, or in society. Both men would agree that life in its natural state is heavily influenced by our Five senses (touch, sight, hear, smell, and taste). …show more content…
These traits are the building blocks of our identity and should be fed in order to better understand who we are. These two men seem to agree that our passions needs special attention in order to have an enduring and comfortable life. Despite being different, they share similar ideas, one being that humans can be similar to animals therefore cannot separate reason from passion. Philosophers like Rene Descartes believe reason triumphs passion, and we are distinct from animals because of God and superior intellect. Without God involved, I believe that in an isolated state away from any outside influence that we are naturally selfish and greedy; in the sense that we feed off our desires similar to animals. We have the will power to do good, but giving into our wants and needs is easier to us. Because of this quality, we are taught to control our emotions, passions, desires and feelings to make sense of our surroundings, but at the same times. Hume and Southworth are both related by opinion and may even support each
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes
    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis
    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke and Hobbes
    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    Locke and Hobbes

    How does the founders' view of power affect the framers' reactions to John Locke? According to Locke, how does man enter the political society and what is the purpose of that society? What obligations does the government have in the civil society? What obligation does the individual have? How do Hobbes and Locke differ? Do you think Americans would agree with Locke? You may read the first paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence to assist you. What evidence do you have to support your view?…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And John Locke
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    A famous American politician and writer known as Theodore Roosevelt once stated, “Wide differences of opinion in matter of religious, political, and social belief must exist if conscience and intellect alike are not to be stunted, if there is to be room for healthy growth.” This quote provides a secure base for the discussion of the political thought and different principles of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Both of these men, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, founded their original thoughts off of a man named William Blackstone. William Blackstone was not only a judge and professor of law, but he was the core originator in which all political thoughts of the Seventeenth Century branched off of. He composed a book known as Commentaries on the Laws of England.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes
    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    Through Aristotle’s work in Politics, he articulates several fundamental aspects of political philosophy that has been greatly influential. Two specific philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Thomas Aquinas, evaluate Aristotle’s perspective of the political nature in relation to mankind. Thomas Aquinas uses Aristotle’s principles as a foundation for his reasoning in writing “On Law, Morality, and Politics.” He modifies Aristotle argument by contributing the religious sphere into the fundamental principles of his political teachings. Thomas Hobbes, on the contrary, is a lot more critical of Aristotle and attacks a lot of his political principles in “The Leviathan.” Hobbes perceives individuals as corrupt, untrustworthy and selfishly motivated, without…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers
    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist Papers

    His philosophy on human nature is that we are animals, ruled by great ego and emotions. Once impulse and…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Machiavelli And Hobbes
    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Machiavelli And Hobbes

    Human nature is reliable, as everyone is born with the same perspective. It is how we are raised and what we are exposed ot that causes us to speak and act the way that we do. Because of this people who are exposed to and raised in similar environments will act similar. This can be seen through Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes; they were both raised in times of chaos and destruction, making them believe that an absolute ruler is necessary to maintaining peace. Both philosophers believe that humans are generally self-interested, and the natural state of humans is chaos and should be avoided at all costs. People are only prosperous when they are selfish and deceitful. Since Machiavelli and Hobbes both grew up in political turmoil, they derived similar beliefs about the malevolent qualities of human nature.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke
    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes vs Locke

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were known as Social Contract Theorists, and Natural Law Theorists. The two men both had very strong views on freedom and how a country should be governed. Thomas Hobbes had more of a Pessimistic view while John locke had more of an Optimistic view. Hobbes and Locke believed in a type of Social Contract between the Government and being governed. Hobbes believed in Absolute Monarchs and Locke believed in the will of people being governed. Hobbes opposed constitutionalism because of his pessimistic appraisal of human nature. They both had extremely different views on government, but the bases of their arguments were similar. They both used reason to justify their ideas, rather than divine right. Although both men acknowledged that there was a God, He played a very small role in their ideologies. I believe that both Hobbes and Locke are genuinely correct.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes
    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbe’s argued that ordinary people were incapable of governing themselves and should willingly submit to the sovereignty of a supreme ruler. They carry out the ruler’s demands, and the ruler, in return, agrees to keep the peace. This type of political theory is know as Absolutism.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    Two of the most influential political philosopher and social contract theorists of all time, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both used ‘The State of Nature’ as a medium in order to understand the basic human nature and natural human rights in their writings. Both, then used their own understanding of the human nature in order to determine and justify the ideal form of government, its role and its powers. However, Locke and Hobbes reach markedly different conclusions. Hobbes argues that every man should concede all of his natural rights to the government and allow it to assume absolute power, while Locke argues that man is entitled to keep his natural rights and a government body is required only in order to protect those certain natural rights.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Locke and Hobbes
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Locke and Hobbes

    Locke and Hobbes disagree almost entirely on everything. I would say that Locke thinks of human nature as essentially good while Hobbes views it as essentially evil. Furthermore, for Hobbes people leave a state of nature for security, as they are driven by year. For Locke, however, the driving force is possessions and material wealth: we will live better if we form a society instead of living separately in a state of nature. I think their philosophy is different because of they background and also they were born in different period of time. Hobbes lived during several wars, and thus his philosophy is central on control and man as essentially greedy and evil. On the other hand, Locke lived in a more perseveres and peaceful time, and therefore his philosophy puts man into a better perseveres. A person history and perseveres influences how they think that is why agree with Locke. Locke and Hobbes both agree on the basic ideas of the state of nature, but for them the state of nature is different. The difference between them is that Locke said that man is by nature a social animal and for Hobbes man is not by nature social. Locke and Hobbes would agree that to rule a country it is necessary to have laws and government. However, Locke would disagree with Hobbes’ ideas of the monarchic rule. For Hobbes a king is the only one who can make the laws and decide for the people. While Hobbes would say the monarchic rule is the best way of ruling a country because people need to be ruled by someone. I like the philosophy of Locke because he is right in many ways by saying the best way to rule a country is to have a legislative government rather than a monarchic government. For example, The United States of America, The Dominican Republic and Brazil have legislative governments while North Korea and Cuba do not. Therefore, because of the way these countries are ruled and how the people can be free and choose they leaders in some ways, I would agree with Locke on his ideas and…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Locke And Hobbes
    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Similarities Between Locke And Hobbes

    Philosophers of the Enlightenment had numerous and often discordant ideas about government, the most notable being the contrasting social contract theories of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Locke believed that humans, in the state of nature, were a blank slate, enjoying complete equality, freedom, and independence. By surrendering some of these natural rights through a social contract, governments were created which would act for the benefit of the people and be controlled by the people. However, certain rights, such as life, freedom, and property, were fixed, and the public had the right to replace any government which violated these rights. As such, Locke’s theory did not support the absolute power of a monarch. This conflicted greatly with Hobbes’ theory, which proclaimed a chaotic state of nature in which humans were innately selfish and savage, and an all-powerful leader was necessary to control them. Though both philosophies have significantly impacted many political systems, Locke’s theory of social contracts, which focuses on a government controlled by reason and the freedom of individuals, is superior to Hobbes authoritarian focused theory.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke And Hobbes
    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    Locke And Hobbes

    Great job with this analysis of Locke's and Hobbes's political philosophy. You brought up a very important point regarding Locke and Hobbes understanding of the need of government and how their views are not the same. Call me a pessimist, but, I can understand what Hobbes was explaining with his "worst case scenario" kind of thinking. As I have said before, I do not think this is a good think, it just seems like the unfortunate reality. I think it is possible to be aware of the seemingly reality of the "worst case scenario" and be able to understand and practice what Locke taught. I believe that Hobbes could be considered an extremist in his views. Does this mean they are wrong? Is the truth always pleasant? Anyway, this is a great subject…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Accomplishments
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes Accomplishments

    Every day we have ideas. Ideas on life, love, and general society. Thomas Hobbes was a fascinating scholar. He had a long life filled with troubles and triumphs. Thomas was man of science, politics, journalism, and mathematics. Thomas wrote many pieces that still inspire people today.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics