Preview

Similarities Between Machiavelli And Hobbes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
545 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Machiavelli And Hobbes
Human nature is reliable, as everyone is born with the same perspective. It is how we are raised and what we are exposed ot that causes us to speak and act the way that we do. Because of this people who are exposed to and raised in similar environments will act similar. This can be seen through Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes; they were both raised in times of chaos and destruction, making them believe that an absolute ruler is necessary to maintaining peace. Both philosophers believe that humans are generally self-interested, and the natural state of humans is chaos and should be avoided at all costs. People are only prosperous when they are selfish and deceitful. Since Machiavelli and Hobbes both grew up in political turmoil, they derived similar beliefs about the malevolent qualities of human nature.
Meet the Philosophers:
Machiavelli, 1469-1526, was an Italian
…show more content…
This marked a time of upheaval and unrest that can be seen throughout Hobbes’ works. The country was divided in a civil war, so he used his time studying at Oxford to derive a philosophical solution to this problem. His admiration for the Scientific Revolution influenced his views. Hobbes believed that in order to maintain a peaceful society, an absolute ruler must be the only person with any political power. Political systems derived from religious organizations could and will not work in the real world. Theological arguments should not be brought into politics, however, the absolute leader can determine the “proper forms of religious worship”; his religious duty can never interfere with their political duties, because politics always comes first over religion. The turmoil in Hobbes’ life led to a negative view on human nature. The unbalance of power in his life, from the Civil Wars to Cromwell’s reigns, led him to believe that society must have an absolute leader because people are naturally

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes added to the ideas of democracy by creating the idea that all men are born bad with an urge for war. He stated that in order to have a stable society, government would be required to strictly watch and govern each citizen. He writes that man should give down their power to a much bigger government in order to maintain a single power that can help control the masses. This bigger…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Hobbes’ mind humans are naturally violent and need to control to avoid any outbursts which would destroy social order (63). People with this thought process saw that the body in power should have complete authority over their subjects with no restraint on their power and no one being able to remove them from their throne. This however is setting a kingdom up for failure as even though some people can be prone to violence, oppressing them with a monarch that controls them too harshly or that are disinterested in ruing a kingdom can cause an even more violent uprising which is displayed in the French revolution. Nonetheless, having a government body put in power is necessary as humans do require leadership and social order but that same government body must be held accountable if there are caught doing any wrongdoings that could severely hinder the progress of the community or create arduous situations to their…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes.
Thomas Hobbes. (1588-1679). ‘Born premature when mother heard of oncoming Armada.’ At 40, he took Euclid’s geometry as starting point to make mechanical model of universe (man and society). Mechanism (based on motion) was to greatly influence thinking over next few centuries. Witness to upheaval of civil war in England in 1640s. Fled to France. 1651. Publishes "Leviathan.”Hobbes sees state of nature sans government as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Promulgates absolute monarch thesis. Says people (wholly selfish) should escape chaos of everyday life, give up their freedom to ruler who guarantees peace and order. In his state Hobbes saw ruler as absolute with men having no right to rebel since this would break the social contract and be illogical.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hobbes, government is needed so that society will not collapse into violence due to humanity’s selfish desires and self-interest. Hobbes believes that humanity’s natural state is motivated by self-interest and will do everything they can to succeed in their endeavors. People will do whatever it takes to fulfill what their idea of ‘good ’is. When everyone acts this way it quickly devolves into chaos, war, and violence.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the start of the Scientific Revolution, people started thinking differently. Scholars and philosophers began to rethink their views about the old society and the way of living. Aspects of government, religion, economics and education were criticized. Two political thinkers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both experienced political hardships throughout their times, however they both came to two totally different conclusions on how future government should be ran.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes and Locke did not have many of the same views on government. Though it is not directly stated in his text, most historians believe Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy. He believed the government should have absolute authority over all the citizens. He believed if such a government did not exist, we would live in a world of turmoil. The sovereign (government) has the obligation of keeping the peace and, when need be, national defense. The sovereign establishes all the laws, and has complete legislative,…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes believed that a tyranny is a better government than anarchy. He believed this because with anarchy, the country would be in order and there will be subjects that would not be able to rebel. He had felt that citizens had to give up all rights while under a government and be under a social contract. Thomas Hobbes also felt that people did not have the right to rebel. In England’s society during the Civil War, it would make the parliamentarians because they were rebelling against the monarchy. Also, Thomas Hobbes believed that people should not summit to a government if the government does not protect them, which made people loyal to the monarchy look bad. Also, Thomas Hobbes had many views on how religious organizations can be run. He believed that the sovereign could decide what the religious or any other organizations can be run by. In his book, Leviathan, Hobbes’s materialistic ideology was key in this text has it described how government can save mankind from civil war with loyalty. In the text, Hobbes believed that a state without government is “nasty and brutish” because it is an anarchy and had no order. The book had an influence on atheists because it spoke of many points of atheistism. It was banned by the non-secular government of England because it was believed to have corrupted the young people. Thomas Hobbes believed…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    on the way things are, illustrating his own intensely practical convictions with frequent examples from the historical record. Although he shared with other humanists a profound pessimism about human nature, Machiavelli nevertheless argued that the social benefits of stability and security can be achieved even in the face of moral corruption.…

    • 4722 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Research Paper

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He believes that people who can’t agree will end up in war which causes destruction in mankind. Considering that Thomas Hobbes was around his mid-50s when the English Civil War happened. Hobbes must have been traumatized by the violence making him believe that people are corrupt and are selfish and horrible. Despite Hobbes thinking, I believe it's wrong for him to judge all of humanity based on a certain event that occurred devastatingly in his life. He should have seen the positivity in people rather than the negativity.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Gilmore Mrs. Sauter World History 15 December 2014 • Topic 1 o Thomas Hobbes  Unite under one person, or a group of people • “To stop foreigners and the inquiries of others” • Hobbes came to the conclusion that people were naturally evil. o If not kept in check by a powerful ruler, they will steal, fight, and oppress one another. o Thomas Hobbes was an enlightenment thinker who lived in the 17th century, and through the upheaval of the English Civil War. From observing the Civil war, Hobbes concluded that people are “naturally cruel, greedy, and selfish” (Ellis 183). Hobbes argued that a strict government was the only way to control people because without it, they would fight, steal, and oppress each other.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Of Enlightenment

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should this ruler fail at that task Hobbes called for a transfer of allegiance of the people. As an atheist, Hobbes argued that religion was a useful propaganda machine as it was very capable of reminding the ignorant masses of their roles and duties. He was of the opinion that human life was, by nature, ‘solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,’ and was doubtful about the prospects for progress in a world so short on ethics. As a result, Hobbes represented the pessimistic side of the Enlightenment, who viewed progress as the result of the suppression on man’s instincts, rather than the freedom granted to those instincts. Next, diametrically opposed to the pessimistic Hobbes was John Locke. In his Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Two Treatises of Government, Locke presented his idea that man’s mind is a “table rasa,” or blank slate. His optimistic belief was that every human is inherently good, and that they can all improve through conscious effort. Locke argued that human nature was mutable, and that knowledge was gained through accumulated experience, rather than the accessing of some outside truth. He also believed in the necessity of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays