Preview

Should We Be Quarantined Due To A Virus, Infection Or Disease?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1072 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should We Be Quarantined Due To A Virus, Infection Or Disease?
Civil liberties are a major part of the U.S and all over the entire world. Civil liberties are freedoms of a citizen to exercise rights, such as freedom of speech or assembly, without being interfered by the government. These laws cannot be violated for any reason at all. There may be no laws created to go against these civil liberties which are protected in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. There are various diseases, contagions, and other viruses that question whether or not if one’s civil liberties should be cut off or put on pause because of its effects, diseases such as aids, Ebola, pneumonia, etc. Should people be quarantined due to a virus, infection or disease? The life of one person should not impact the life of thousands, millions …show more content…
This should be done to protect the life and save the lives of all other citizens. Innocent lives shouldn’t be put at risk due to one person or a few people. Even though it may seem immoral no life is greater than another and the majority should be protected over the minority. When should civil liberties be overlooked or should they ever? Although civil liberties are a very important factor of human moral rights, they should be put on hold when it comes to public health and the common good of the people. The government has done many things to erode on the fundamental rights of people when it comes to the health of the public such as isolating and quarantining individuals, making mandatory vaccination laws, invading privacy and even going as far as using law enforcement to help retain and keep a hand on these infectious deadly …show more content…
In Howard Markel’s book Quarantine he explains how there was a point in time in which immigrants coming into New York were isolated and kept in squalid conditions to help prevent the spread of cholera and typhus. This quarantine gave immigrants limited freedoms and limited rights to certain things due to their predicaments and being put in these isolated regions away from others. Also in the text, Ebola vs. Civil Liberties it states, “Having committed no crime, having done no wrong, you are sentenced to house arrest or banishment. It is unfair. It is well, well un-American. But when an epidemic threatens, we do it because we must.” This quotation deliberately explains why those who are infected during an epidemic are violated. It is a must. Though it may be morally wrong and goes against the American rights and traditions it is only done to protect the public health and the majority citizens and the continuation of the disease

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With the growing fear of disease; the start of legislative quarantine was formed. Quarantine was the first line of defense. Kraut explained a colony in Massachusetts passed a law that selectively excluded the sick or physically disabled. A quote from chapter one explains, “No Lame, impotent, or infirm persons, incapable of maintaining themselves, should be received…” (p. 23). Kraut stated that by 1916, exclusion reached up to sixty-nine percent. The mystery of what kind of people to admit into American and how to increase their physical and mental potential was a central theme of immigration history and health care in the United…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the film Contagion, there was a ethical debate about how is information given out and who gets the info first? The CDC and the government reached an agreement to keep classified information about the disease (MEV-1) from the citizens of America. Dr. Ellis Cheever told his wife to get out of Chicago, Illinois before it was quarantined to limit the spread of disease. Limiting the amount of information to the public can contain the public inhuman behavior such as Rioting, criminal assault and damage of property. Secondly, this means that the doctors could stay focused on their work and not have to deal with captivity or theft from laboratories. This would prevent more deaths in the future if the doctors would stay on task to find a vaccine…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    I however think that it’s perfectly appropriate in the name of war only if some other country attacked us first. Another controversial topic that ties in perfectly to this topic is the nuclear bomb and the death of thousands in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I only support this devastating attack because of what Japan did to the U.S and the bombing of Pearl Harbor. I do not support it when we do it just to kill thousands of people without a reason. It’s a lot cheaper and easier to create pathogens then to invent new form of weaponry in the gun or tank department. The U.S is a very powerful county with a big target on it for terrorist attacks. I like the thought of Biological engineered viruses because they can be used to create a sense of fear in the eyes of terrorists all over the world. People always say fear keeps you alive, so, if we can put fear in the eyes of people without killing them. Sickness is a natural part of life. Everyone gets sick eventually. Using pathogens almost seems natural, at least more natural than using guns. The main reason I support biowarfare is that it’s a lot safer to American soldiers to release a disease to cripple the bad guys than to send all these young men and women into the middle of a gunfight where many of them are shot and…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Others have questioned the need to increase influenza vaccination rates among HCWs, claiming that HCWs should simply avoid patient contact when ill. Unfortunately, although HCWs say that they will stay home when sick, in reality, many HCWs routinely come to work with symptoms of influenza-like illness.32,46,47 In addition, people may shed influenza virus during the 24 hours before the onset of clinical illness48 or in the absence of clinical symptoms,49 which enables HCWs to transmit the virus to their patients, even when the HCWs feel well. A variety of ethical issues are involved in a mandatory program such as this. In sum, one attempts to balance the benefits that accrue to patient safety against the loss of the individual’s right to choose.50-52 During the planning process for our program, the ethics committee was involved, and we enlisted the help of outside ethicists as well. Overall, it was felt that the importance of protecting our patients was paramount. However, a mandatory program needs to be flexible enough so that valid reasons for avoiding vaccine use can be accommodated. We include both medical and religious reasons as part of this process.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public health efforts are planning to protect the general health and safety of the population by taking measures to prevent or avoid the transmission of disease. Historically, measures such as quarantines were enforced, where there were no means to vaccinate or inoculate to prevent the spread of a dangerous transmissible disease. In more modern times, vaccines were developed to protect against diseases, and of course, in the case of smallpox, the disease was able to be eliminated in 1979, so there's no longer a need to vaccinate against it. In modern times, there is little reliance on quarantine, though people with multiply-antibiotic-resistant TB and other diseases may be detained and isolated. In the early 19th century, the growing towns of Britain were characterised by overcrowding, poor housing, bad water and disease.…

    • 3199 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, Kaci Hickox was a nurse who volunteered in Africa in order to help people afflicted with ebola, and came back to the united states. Hickox was put under quarantine for three days in New Jersey. Hickos was placed in-home quarantine for 21 days “”despite the fact that Hickox did not have any symptoms.” Furthermore, her partner, Wilbur, was asked to stay off campus for fear that he would ebola on his college, even though Hickok was asymptomatic and “someone with Ebola cannot infect another person until they develop symptoms.” Hickox believed these government actions were unjust, made a stigma against those who volunteered in ebola afflicted countries, and was ultimately “counterproductive to our Ebola response as well as harmful to the individuals affected.” The quarantine creates a stigma which would cause long term…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have easily shown that the requirement of the vaccine does not infringe on peoples life, liberty, or freedom, as it does the greater good of the community by having all people get it. I have also avoided any equal protection of the law by requiring everyone to get the vaccine as long as they fall into the FDA approval categories. I have not excluded any groups, other than medical waivers, or people whom the FDA has already determined should not use the…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Ebola

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ebola is a world issue at this point, as leaders of public health we have the responsibility to make an example of how to handle viral outbreaks. The current ban on visas to those who have been in west Africa is not the way to do this. While some believe that banning these people from entering Canada is the best way to protect our citizens, there are several arguments against the ban. Including that the bans gives incentive for countries to hide viral outbreaks, that this gives incentive for people to travel via les documented means in order to avoid these bans, that these people can not be tracked and helped if they are found to be infected, the several effects that disregarding the WHO, the experts leading world health, can have, and the unjustified reasons for implementation [1]. I will consider both sides.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When people travel outside of the United States, they risk getting an illness because if they don’t have their vaccines, they’re more likely to pick up on the native sicknesses that people from outside the area aren’t used to. This means that if they were to travel home, they could cause an outbreak of something, like mentioned above in the Texas story. This obviously doesn’t happen all the time, but when it does, it can be bad for public health in the general area. When people also travel in from other countries can be a problem. Such as with the minor Ebola outbreak, we aren’t always in control of the situation, but then it’s a problem of containing the outbreak and keeping everyone safe from the…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every US citizen is born with Civil liberties and Civil Rights (or given when they become a citizen) They are very important and are a fundamental part of the constitution. Civil Liberties and Civil Rights are both almost the same except civil liberties protect individuals from the government and civil rights are rights every US citizen has.. Civil rights are rights that are given to US citizens they are rights to political and social freedom and equality. They include the first ten amendments of the bill of rights these amendments in the constitution are the right to bare arms, right to freedom of religion, the right to vote and even the freedom of the press. Civil Liberties are basic rights and freedoms that protect individuals from the…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the financial benefits, the uses in the past, and the ideals of not putting people in the hospital vaccines should be essential in this country and world. Workers not getting sick is a great way to help the economy. Vaccines have been used to get rid of diseases from this world. It is also morally wrong to give people sickness. If you don’t believe that people getting vaccines should be imperative do some research for yourself and form your own…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should vaccinations be mandatory or be optional, forced or forgotten, used or left to dust. As you know people can make things with the best intention, but there can be consequences it could harm others. And if the government forces you to inject something into your blood that you're allergic to, or it’s against your religion, or if it causes you pain and suffering instead of helping you. Then you have a right to stop it.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why this is so important, and why I am even speaking about this is because we need to keep not just ourselves, but the people around us safe. Without keeping others safe, how will we save ourselves? Like I stated in my first paragraph, vaccinations can be the direction if you lose your life or stay alive. These diseases are not something that should be gambled with. Taking all the possible procedures to stay healthy and happy is going to be one of the best decisions you…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The topic I chose for discussion is whether I would chose to follow the CDC’s (Center for Disease Control) recommendations for having my child vaccinated against certain vaccine-preventable diseases.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In my opinion vaccinations should be mandatory for all children. It is dangerous and irresponsible not to. Our job as parents is to protect our children and their future by not vaccinating we are not doing so. If I had it my way and everybody vaccinated I would no longer be worried of my loved ones, myself and others being affected with an incurable deadly disease.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays