Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Saussure's Definition of Language

Satisfactory Essays
390 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Saussure's Definition of Language
Most studies of language take a diachronic approach that emphasised, for instance, a "cause/effect" or sequential view of meaning and communication. Saussure used a synchronic method of study that looked at simultaneous relationships. One result of the synchronic method was Saussure's insistence on the double nature of language and linguistic elements.
Saussure insisted on the systematic nature of language; "Language is a structure, a functioning whole in which the different parts are determined by one another" (Course in General Linguistics p. 9). The combined elements of parole and langue form language. Language states Saussure, manifests itself as speech (parole), the actual performance of speakers when they speak or write, also language (langue), which represents the knowledge or competence that all speakers possess of their language (Course in General Linguistics p. 8- 9).
Speech says Saussure, "has both an individual and social side … always implies both establish system and evolution" (Course in General Linguistics p. 8). All changes in language occur in parole, in the actual speech act. But only some of these changes become institutionalised in langue. Saussure states that langue, should not be confused with human speech, it is a system or structure of speech codes. He argued that linguistic elements are relational, that it is viewpoint that creates the object of linguistic study. Because so much depends on viewpoint, the nature of the linguistic sign is necessarily arbitrary.
Saussure followed that if we are able to recognise things through mental representations, then the brain also has to recognise words we hear via mental representations, in conjunction with distinguishing what the words mean via representations. From this, Saussure goes on to make the sign the unity of sound-image and concept. Thus like Aristotle he seems to think that there are mental facts (concepts). He does not believe however of the sound as a sign of those concepts, rather that the sound that travels due to the physical disturbance in the air (is associated with a mental representation of the sound) the sound-image.
Another distinct difference between philosophers is when Saussure also states that, "There are no pre-existing ideas, and nothing is distinct before the appearance of language" (Course in General Linguistics p. 112). This varies from Aristotle's theory, who considers that individuals have pre-linguistic thoughts that are then coded into language.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Structuralism takes two basic ideas from Saussure’s work. First, a concern with the underlying relations of cultural text and practices – the grammar which makes meaning possible. Second, the view that meaning is always the result of the interplay of relationship of selection and combination made possible by the underlying structure.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Big Lebowski Analysis

    • 4716 Words
    • 19 Pages

    It is a construction in which one can express who they want to be. This construct can additionally be the identity of a group and not just of a single individual. Nowadays there are almost unlimited ways of creating one’s identity, e.g. by wearing certain clothes or by behaving in society in a specific manner. These ways can serve as a self-fulfilment. The language of an individual can be seen as a kind of construction of identity and reality in a conversation (cf. Kresic, p.162). Here, language refers to de Saussure’s term Parole, which is the concrete usage of utterances. Accordingly, I will have a look at the Dude’s practical spoken language. One can only express his or her identity through language because that is what creates the identity itself (cf. Kresic, p.169). An individual also marks his social identity through his or her language, for example a well educated person shows his or her knowledge by using loanwords or technical terms and therefore his or her affiliation to this specific group (cf. Holmes, p.127). The belonging to a social group can therefore be identified through the language that is used.…

    • 4716 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Language – it is a way of communicating in a pre-structured, systematic, rule directed manner using speech, with conventional meanings understood by masses of people. It contains rules on how to understand and make up words, how to structure words together to make up a meaningful sentence verbally, in written form or signed, how to use sentences to make up stories, conversations and other texts, and how to use symbols, gestures and sounds. Language can be used without speech, such as in Sign language, or the use of body language to convey messages understood in various languages (such as a wave for “Hello” or “Goodbye”).…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eymp 5

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Language is a set of symbols either spoken; written or signed that can be used and understood between people. Language can be quit abstract. Linguist also suggest that the main feature of a language is a series of roles that users have to understand and use, at first children cannot use the rules, toddlers begin just pointing at an object and saying one word but after a while they start to learn how to construct sentences. Language can be a sound, signal or gesture.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Matrix Liberal Humanist

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Much like the false reality in the Matrix, Saussure presents are own language as somewhat of a false reality. The words we use from day to day are just random collections of letters that we have assigned meaning too. Even those letters that make up words were created by humans and were not natural or inherited from the planet. Reality is only what we believe to be real at that point. An example of what Saussure theorizes about language would be to look at the word, "fact". In truth there is no such thing as a fact yet we look at the word and assume that whatever comes after or before it is true. At some point in time it was a fact that the world was flat. Saussure states that language is constantly moving and changing and it is outside of one man to change it. The culture shapes the language and makes it mean what the overall shift of the media or people want it to mean.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAGUAGE – Language is the ability to acquire and use systems of communication; is the cognitive ability to use and learn symbols of communicating that can be spoken, written or signed.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saussure vs. Pierce

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ferdinand de Saussure and Charles Sanders Piece were contemporaries but came from different academic traditions. While both theorists were in opposition to historical linguistics, they came to different conclusions in the theories of signs.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Semiotics in Art History

    • 2512 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In art history, the simplest description of semiology consists of the translation of an image into words. Two prominent founders of the contemporary sign theories are Peirce and Saussure. Although they focus on the same methodology, both philosophers explain the production of meaning through sign in different manners.…

    • 2512 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    rene margritte

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unquestionably, our knowledge of language and how we relate text between images is how we as human keep at a particular relationship with the world. Language is a system of representation; it functions in our world as a system of classification that helps us to understand the world we live in and also one another. According to Erwin Panofsky, Fernando de Saussure who was considered the founder of linguistics “defined the human as a language maker”3, this then lead Saussure accompanied alongside Charles S .Pierce to bring to life the system of semiotics or semiology.”Semiotic theory…focuses on communication as a social process” (Chaplin, E.)4. This distinction was made by the relationship between the signifier (word) and signified…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language- Language is set of symbols which can be spoken, written or signed. Language refers to understanding and making sense of what people say. We don’t have to have speech to have a language because language can be sign language, gestures, written language etc. Language is using words to build up sentences.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Visual Culture

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Saussure 's work on semiotics is better known, and he argued that there was no inherent or necessary relationship between that which carries the meaning (the signifier, usually a word or symbol) and the actual meaning which is carried (the signified). For example, the word "car" is not actually a car - the meaning of car could be carried by any random string of letters. It just so happens that, in English, that meaning is carried by the letter c-a-r.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teun A. Van Dijk, in his essay "Pragmatics and Poetics," explains the reason for speech is "to change the internal state of the hearer" (Dijk 30). Ferdinand de Saussure describes in his essay, "Nature of the Linguistic Sign," how a word is more connected to the minds of the speaker and the hearer than to anything else. He describes that the "linguistic sign" as a unit formed equally by the association of a "concept" and a "sound-image." The "sound-image" is what one would call a spoken word, something that "signifies." Saussure describes it as "the psychological imprint of the sound, the impression that it makes on our senses" (Saussure 832). He goes on to describe its materiality: "the sound-image is sensory" (Saussure 832). The term "concept" is summed-up as being "generally more abstract" (Saussure 833) than the "sound-image." The "concept," it appears, is…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Aynalara

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Starting with the epigraph of “Aynalara bakma, aynalar fenalık, denizi, sonsuz olanı düşün artık (p.5)” from Ahmet Muhip Dıranas, narration of Fehmi K. ve Acayip Serüvenleri reminds a transition from imaginary order inholding Lacanist mirror phase to a symbolic order (Arıkan, 2015 p.386). Lacan synthesizes the linguistic theory of Ferdinand de Saussure, describing Freud's unconscious concept as a system of indigenous representations, based on the symbolic order on which the language and discourse are founded in the unconscious. Saussure uses the linguistic theory of signs to describe the overlapping of the unconscious with the language system and says, "It is structured as an unconscious language" (Lacan, 1977, p. 20) According to Lacan, as it is in the language, unconscious interpretation works through the “indicative” and “indicated” and this process starts from the moment that baby enters the language. All of the beings who step into the language and then become the subject of…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A theory of language based on J. L. Austin 's How to Do Things with Words (second edition, 1975), the major premise of which is that language is as much, if not more, a mode of action as it is a means of conveying information. As John Searle puts it, "All linguistic communication involves linguistic acts. The unit of linguistic communication is not, as has generally been supposed, the symbol, word, or sentence, or even the token of the symbol, word, or sentence, but rather the production or issuance of the symbol or word or sentence in the performance of a speech act." Meaning, then, should be regarded as a species within the genus intending-tocommunicate, since language itself is highly complex, rule-governed intentional behavior. A theory of language is part of a theory of action. The basic emphasis of speech act theory is on what an utterer (U) means by his utterance (x) rather than what x means in a language (L). As H.P. Grice notes, "meaning is a kind of intending," and the hearer 's or reader 's recognition that the speaker or writer means something by x is part of the meaning of x. In contrast to the assumptions of structuralism (a theory that privileges langue, the system, over parole, the speech act), speech act theory holds that the investigation of structure always presupposes something about meanings, language use, and extralinguistic functions In How to Do Things with Words, Austin commences by enunciating a reasonably clear-cut distinction between constative and performative utterances. According to him, an utterance is constative if it describes or reports some state of affairs such that one could say its correspondence with the facts is either true or false. Performatives, on the other hand, "do not 'describe ' or 'report ' or constate anything at all, are not 'true ' or 'false. ' . . . The uttering of the sentence is, or is part of. the doing of an action,…

    • 2238 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Role Of Language

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Language is an essential from of communication. It allows people to convey and elaborate their perspective. However, there are many forms and styles of language. Different counties and religions have different ancestral languages and styles of speaking.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays