Preview

Richard The Lionheart Warriors Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1390 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard The Lionheart Warriors Of God
Richard the Lionheart and Saladin Richard the Lionheart and Saladin are known as some of the greatest leaders and warriors to fight in The Crusades. The book Warriors of God, by James Reston describes these two men throughout their battles in the Third Crusade. Many portrayals of these two men are either ones that make them look like the kindest of any of the Crusaders or some of the meanest, most gruesome men to fight. James Reston does a very good job of finding a medium between the two and gives the reader a good understanding of what these two great leaders were like without being biased. Richard the Lionheart was portrayed by Reston as one of the greatest Crusaders of all. After reading this book, the reader would not be able to …show more content…
There were stories of him doing things that were so amazing that you would think that he was actually more than human. There was one story of him having to fight a lion. When the lion attacked him, Richard ducked under the leaping animal. As it passed over him, he quickly punched it. The lion then fell down, groaning with pain and as it did, Richard reached down the lion's throat and pulled out his heart. He then held it up to his captor and squeezed it, ringing out the blood. In another part of the book, Reston makes him out to be almost superhuman again. He talks about how Richard was "the hero of Europe...the greatest warrior of the Continent," as well as mentioning other great qualities and characteristics of Richard throughout the …show more content…
He was surprisingly generous for his position, as most people leading an army would not be. I previously talked about Richard the Lionheart's ruthlessness. Saladin was in no way like that. An example of Saladin showing his generosity was at the battle at Jaffa. Richard was down in battle and had lost his horse. Saladin saw this and sent him two horses. He said that "a man as great as he is should not be in parts such as these, on foot with his men." This also showed the respect that Saladin had for Richard. Saladin was also generous in his dealings with Richard at times when they were dividing up the land. Early on in the book, there is a time where Saladin notices that one of his prisoners is far too old to have come to battle in The Crusade. He asks him what he is doing there and the man replies, "I only came to this country to make a pilgrimage to the Church of the Resurrection." Saladin felt for the man. He then set him free and provided him with a horse. He had one of his men escort him through his people to make sure that the man made it out without any trouble. Soon after that he rejected all requests by his men to execute the remaining prisoners. Reston says, "His actions seemed to define what it meant to be a good Muslim. By his amnesties and various charities toward his enemies he secured forever his reputation for gentility and wisdom." (p.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Examinations of Shakespeare's play 'King Richard III' and Pacino's docu-drama 'Looking for Richard' reveals relationships between the texts and their respective audience. The fifteenth century and twentieth century contexts demonstrates the values of each text and enables understanding of how the film enriches the ideas presented in the play. 'King Richard III' portrays a hateful, corrupted Richard exploring divine justice and the notion of appearance versus reality in the context of the Elizabethan era. With a time difference of four centuries 'Looking for Richard' reflects the Pacino's quest to understand a Shakespearean text through a personal examination of the same character. This docu-drama reflects the postmodern era's absence of divine order and the change of conscience. Through the comparative study of these texts our understanding of different contexts and values are illuminated.…

    • 902 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a kid, Richard was always regarded as a failure. He was a scrawny, kid, always cut from the basketball team, bullied, and rarely got any…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard III demonstrated a great capacity to become a good king. Whilst in charge he made many wise decisions and the bad choices were made with the best of intentions or due to necessity. I will show how far he had the capacity to become a great king.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The comparative analysis of Shakespeare’s “Richard III” circa 1591 and Al Pacino’s 1996 docudrama “Looking for Richard” (LFR) reveals the capacity of these texts to transcend their timeframes due to their exploration of ideas perennially relevant to human nature. As humans, there is an innate desire of us to exert our ideals and beliefs on others as well as an underlying ambition for power, hence these texts explore the way in which art can be used to shape and reshape historical perceptions as well as the universal relevance of power to human beings.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally in 1995, the movie Braveheart came into being and with it the final representation of Robert the Bruce. A view that shows him as a weak and childish man who was ruled by his father and used as a “puppet”. Even though at the end of the movie it shows a redeemable side to the Bruce’s character, the beginning of the movie is filled with negative representations of his nature, and I will hopefully use these differences to contrast to my other sources.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BlackBoy Paper

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard wanted to be himself and live life how he wanted but not in a wild way. He wanted to go up north because he…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first glance, the protagonist of Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere is hardly hero material. When you think of heroes, you probably think of Odysseus and Robin Hood—not Richard Mayhew, an ordinary man living a boring life in London. He isn’t exceptionally smart, he isn’t very brave, and he has no ambition whatsoever. Richard, at the beginning of the novel, isn’t truly living: he’s existing.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard II Research Paper

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What makes a good king? In Shakespeare's play Richard II, the topic of kingship is explored through the conflict between Bolingbroke and Richard II. Once the conflict is resolved, via Richard's death, Bolingbroke is faced with a new crisis concerning his wanton son. Through King Henry IV's concern for his son, Shakespeare examines public perception of kingship. This essay will focus on the role of kingship, the importance of cultural capital, and the potential character foreshadowing of Henry IV's son.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard was the king of England, he was then later on known as the ‘Lion Heart’. He was famous for the things he did in the Third Crusade. Although King Richard the Lionheart ruled for ten whole years, he only was in England for six months. He had a lot of fighting powers in him, but like his brothers he fought with his family. He joined his family to have an extremely large fight with his father Henry II in 1173. In 1183, sadly his brother Henry died, leaving Richard to be the leader of England.…

    • 404 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texts are often a reflection of the society they embody: through awareness of context deeper levels of understanding can be developed and explored. By a comparative study of texts parallels in context can be established and evaluated, with the alternate visual mediums key in enhancing the audience experience. Al Pacino’s “Looking for Richard,” (1996) provides a more coherent view of William Shakespeare’s “Richard III,” (1592), using similarities between texts to accommodate a modern audience. Both texts represent common themes of war, demonstrating the inherent evil of mankind through characterisation, with respective societal influence affecting their portrayal. Shakespeare’s text strongly portrays the presence of propaganda in society, an influence still present in the context of 1996. Through the employment of the visual medium, Al Pacino is capable of displaying these influences to a postmodern audience, demonstrating the similarities in context and purpose.…

    • 962 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard has pointed out an important issue that 21st-century face. I have never felt so much pressure and stress before. But when I came to U.S, I am constantly stressed out and busy. When Richard mentioned the third world countries does not have this much problem, it made me think that is really true. Everything in a slow pace and people enjoys life.…

    • 63 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii Conscience

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Richard's self "love" (5.5. 141), the kernel of his own identity, is threatened by the "fear" (5.5.136) his conscience instills in him. Throughout most of the play, the statement "Richard loves Richard" (5.5.137) functions as the character's motivation ‹ Gloucester consistently acts for his own "gain" (1.2.162). That self, however, has never been firmly worked out. The many "outward appearances" (Luxon) that Richard projects in the play are often contradictory, as he himself admits when he states that he "seem[s] a saint when most [he] play[s] the devil" (1.3.336). His interview with Anne shows just how malleable his self-identity is. Picturing himself through her eyes after he has wooed her, he states "I do mistake my person all this while" (1.2.239) and is determined to "maintain" his heightened opinion of himself with "some little…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The texts King Richard III and Looking for Richard both accept the centrality of power and the yearning for it, as a central plot driver and an assumed part of the human condition. However, each presents a different perspective as to the nature of power; its origins and morality.…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Connections of commonality and dissimilarity may be drawn between a multiplicity of texts through an appreciation of the values and attitudes with which they were composed. Accordingly, the values and attitudes of the individual being may be defined as an acute blend of externally induced, or contextual and internally triggered, or inherent factors. Cultural, historical, political, religious and social influences, dictated by the nature of one’s surroundings, imprint a variable pattern of values and attitudes upon the individual. Thus any deviation in any such factor may instigate an alteration of the contextual component of one’s perspective. By contrast, the psychological fundamentals of humanity are sturdy and whilst they partake in the definition of the values and attitudes of the individual, they are unwavering. Shakespeare’s historical play ‘Richard III’ and Pacino’s docudrama ‘Looking for Richard’ confirm such theory through an exploration of the contextual and inherent. A scrutiny of the contradictory forces of humanism and determinism and the function of women as demonstrated by both texts imparts an incongruity of context. Difference is thus conveyed. Conversely, an acknowledgement of the strength of conscience common to both texts suggests an inherent influence. Thus it is through inspection of the prescribed texts that one may distinguish the degree to which the texts converge on inherent matters and diverge on contextual matters.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivanhoe Quotes

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He does not want his identity to be revealed due to the fact that he does not want his brother to know he has arrived back in England, so he disguises himself. But King Richard does not only have tangible victories over his enemies. He also has victory in his efforts to encourage cooperation between the Normans and the Saxons. In the novel, Normans are generally associated with cruelty and oppression. King Richard proves these stereotypes wrong by reigning justly over the nation, resulting in approval from not only the Normans, but the Saxons as well. He speaks with “a tone of majesty suited to the high rank, and no less distinguished character of Coeur de Lion” (Scott 360). Richard is a noble king who treats his subjects with the same amount of respect, regardless of their descent. However, his brother Prince John behaves poorly toward the Saxons, and his actions reflect upon the Norman people, which only exacerbates the tension between the two rival…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays