In the case of R v. Mian SCC 54-Cocaine with intent of trafficking is significant and is a key part showing the Supreme court's effectiveness at upholding the individual's right. The right to be immediately read the reason as to why the individual was arrested, The Supreme Court placed more value of the infringed rights of the individual rather than focussing the severity of the crime. This case sets a precedent and places great significance on the way in which all police officers should carry out individuals detainment, making sure to follow the procedures and to insure no rights are infringed under the charter of rights and freedoms. The final decision of this case proves that the Supreme court is concentrated on both needs of …show more content…
In this case between an estranged couple and their triplets the father of the babies claimed his rights were infringed and took the matter to the Supreme Court. By leaving the father out of the decision of the children’s surname, the highest court ruled the equality rights of the biological father were in fact infringed and violated compared to the decision at the lower trial. The lower court now has a year to alter this law or be declared invalid. The outcome of this case protects all individuals rights when it comes to equal protection under the law no matter what, no one is