Preview

Quick Ratio: Supermax Vs. Adventa Berhad

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
990 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Quick Ratio: Supermax Vs. Adventa Berhad
3.1 Quick Ratio
The quick ratio for Supermax Corporation Berhad and Adventa Berhad are 0.79 times and 1.4 times respectively. It shows that Adventa is able to settle its current liabilities in a very shot period compared to Supermax but alternatively investigates that it has investing too much of its resources in working capital ($Accounting-Simplified n.d.$). The lower quick ratio of Supermax indicates that it is taking a higher risk by fail to maintain its liquid resources but alternately reveals the better credit terms with its supplier than Adventa ($Accounting-Simplified n.d.$). For every RM1 of current liabilities, Supermax has only RM0.79 worth of quick asset. The higher quick ratio of Supermax is due to its current liabilities, it has
…show more content…
Supermax Corporation Berhad and Adventa Berhad have a debt ratio less than 50% reveals that both of them are less risky in finance, their total assets are capable to pay off their debts, liabilities and interests (MyAccountingCourse 2018). Supermax Corporation Berhad may face a higher bankruptcy financial risk due to the higher amount of debts compared to Adventa Berhad. The higher percentage in debt ratio shows that Supermax Corporation Berhad has a poor debt management in total assets that is financed by debt (Irfanullah Jan 2018). Besides, it is relative costly for Supermax Corporation Berhad to borrow additional loans and debts from the bank if the company don’t raise up its equities and assets. The investors and creditors of Supermax Corporation Berhad will be unwilling to invest and lend more money to the company when compared to Adventa Berhad due to a higher percentage of debt ratio. The debt ratio of Supermax Corporation Berhad is higher than Adventa Berhad may due to the poor management of the company in debts and liabilities, they do not put the efforts as Adventa Berhad has done in managing total assets that is financed by their debts. Therefore, Supermax Corporation Berhad should be looking for more equity and …show more content…
Supermax Corporation Berhad has a higher book value per share which is RM1.59 than the RM0.53 of Adventa Berhad, the market value per share is RM1.94 and RM0.655 for Supermax Corporation Berhad and Adventa Berhad respectively as at the end of the financial year (Yahoo Finance 2018). Both of the companies have a market to book ratio with greater than 1, this indicates that their stock price are not undervalued and the money invest to the company is worthy (ROSEMARY 2018). Adventa Berhad has a slightly better M/B ratio than Supermax is due to a relatively higher market price, which means the book value invested to Adventa Berhad is worth more than Supermax. So, investors is more willing to pay for a share of Adventa Berhad than to the Supermax Corporation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    fin 341

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liquidity ratios show the relationship between the current assets and current liabilities. These ratios provide us with a view of the company’s ability to pay its current liabilities. KR has a current ratio of 0.72 and a quick ratio of 0.25. WFM has a current ratio of 2.15 and a quick ratio of 1.77. Both companies’ consists largely of inventory. If both KR and WFM sold their entire inventory, they would be in the same comparable position. These ratios show that WFM is more liquid than KR.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whole Foods Ratio

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kroger and Whole Foods are the two giants in the grocery industry; however, their capital structure and financial measures paint vastly different pictures. The liquidity ratios, which measure short term solvency of the company, were calculated for both companies. The current ratio for Kroger was calculated to be .76 compared to a current ratio for Whole Foods of 1.60. At a glance, Whole Foods is more able to pay their short term debt obligations compared to Kroger. In the same vein, Whole Foods has a much higher quick ratio at 1.20 compared to .25 for Kroger. The capital structure of the two companies is the main reason for the distinct differences in the liquidity ratios. Kroger has financed the company’s expansions with debt; whereas, Whole Foods has financed their expansions with equity. One of the reasons why Whole Foods’ quick ratio is higher than Kroger’s quick ratio is due to inventory management. Whole Foods is an industry leader at inventory management. Whole Foods inventory consists of two-thirds perishable foods, which requires management to have outstanding inventory management to be profitable. Due to the outstanding inventory management of Whole Foods, the quick ratio for the company is higher compared to the much larger Kroger.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The strength of Mark X as a company is its fixed assets turnover ratio, which rose from 1990 to 1992. This tells us Mark X 's ability to generate net sales from each addition of a fixed asset. Sales generated from the fixed assets are greater than the costs of the fixed assets, which imply that the fixed assets that were purchased are good investments for the company. This is really the only positive ratio they have at the moment. Weaknesses we found in Mark X were its debt ratio, which increased from 40.47% in 1990 to 46.33% in 1991 and from 46.33% to 59.80% in 1992. This shows us Mark X 's amount of debt relative to its assets is increasing and that its debt is equal to more than half of its assets by 1992. The current ratio and quick ratio has also indicated negative change, both decreasing between 1990 and 1992. The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company 's ability to pay short term obligations, while the quick ratio shows a company 's ability to pay its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. Both ratios are steadily decreasing, indicating to us the position of the company has become less and less favorable.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mgt 5000

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. You are analyzing a company that has cash of $11,200, accounts receivable of $27,800, fixed assets of $124,600, accounts payable of $31,300, and inventory of $56,900. What is the quick ratio?…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladbrokes Vs Hill

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most companies use current ratio in order to estimate their financial position. This ratio compares liquid assets with short term liabilities. A current ratio, higher or equal 1.0, informs that current assets should cover current obligations in case of bankruptcy. Quick ratio is more accurate ratio of liquidity rather than current ratio, because it contains solely the most liquid assets and eliminates the inventory that might be difficult to convert into…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A main measurement of a company’s solvency is their debt- to-asset ratio. “This ratio indicates the proportion of total assets that are financed by debt.” (text) If this ratio is high it indicates a greater financing risk. In 2007 WestJet’s debt-to-asset ratio was 68.2%, it decreased in 2008 to 66.9%. This means they are financing more of the assets with equity in 2008 compared to 2007. When we compare this ratio to Air Canada we see a telling story. In 2007 Air Canada’s debt-to-asset ratio was 77.8%, but in 2008 it rose to 91.6% mainly due to a rise in current liabilities. This shows that Air Canada is relying greatly on debt to finance their assets. When comparing the two, it is obvious that WestJet’s financing strategy is less risky as well…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark X Case Answers

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Liquidity ratio. The firm’s liquidity shows a downward trend through time. The current ratio is decreasing because the growth in current liabilities outpaces the growth of current assets. The quick ratio is also declining but not as fast as the current ratio. From 1991 to 1992, it only decreased 0.35 units while the current ratio decreased 0.93 units. Looking at the common size balance sheet, we also see that the percentage of inventory is growing from 33% to 48% indicating Mark X could not convert its inventory to cash.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jb Hi-Fi Financial Analysis

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The tests of liquidity can be used to help determine the relationship between current assets and liabilities and subsequently the company’s ability to pay its debt. The two ratios used to help determine liquidity are Current Ratio and Quick Ratio. The Current ratio helps determine the balance between current assets and total current liabilities as at a specific date and the Quick ratio compares the assets defined as ‘quick’ such as cash and near cash assets (most liquid) to that of the current liabilities (Potter, Libby, Libby &…

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jb Hi-Fi Financial Analysis

    • 3054 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Quick ratio: This ratio examines a firm’s ability to use its quick assets to extinguish its current liabilities immediately. Inventory or stock is generally excluded from this equation in order to produce a more accurate account of the firm’s ability to meet its short term obligations…

    • 3054 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bp Accounting Ratios

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The quick ratio has increased by 0.0246 from 0.7467 to 0.7713. Quick ratios are a measure of the financial strength or weakness of a company and gives insight into how liquid a company is. BP had a higher quick ratio in 2005 than 2004 which translates into being more able to pay liabilities in 2005. The quick ratio was even higher in 2003 at 0.8471; demonstrating that BP was more liquid in 2003. The ratios were lower in 2001 and 2002 indicating a lower ability to liquidate. The quick ratio for BP was lower than the industry average. This shows that BP?s competitors are more liquid then BP is.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current Ratio

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. For this reason, the ratio excludes inventories from current assets…

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Padgett Paper Products

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The company has significant levels of Equity and is not minimizing its financial structure. It is able of taking more debt, but the debt needs to be more properly structured. The D/E ratio during the years increased significantly. In 1993 the D/E ratio was 22% and in 1996 it grew at 67% (Appendix1). Also the Comparison of the total Equity and the total Liabilities show that the share of Equity of…

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Baldwin Bicycle Case

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing the debt to equity we see that there is more debt than there is equity. This is a dangerous position for the firm to be in.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study Guide

    • 4134 Words
    • 17 Pages

    1. You are analyzing a company that has cash of $2,000, accounts receivable of $3,700, fixed assets of $10,900, accounts payable of $6,600, and inventory of $4,100. What is the quick ratio?…

    • 4134 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cadbury Vrio

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Debt/Equity ratio of the company is as low as 0.02%. This ratio is negligible and it can be said that it is almost an all equity company. Because of such a capital structure of the company, it gives the signal of a safe investment. The risk associated with the company will be low and hence it will be able to raise additional debt as well as equity with reasonable ease. However, we suggest that the company can take the benefit of financial leverage by raising debt in case of future capital requirements. It is outstanding that the company has huge Reserves and Surplus and hence they can fund projects through Internal Equity.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays