Preview

Question of the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty as Related to Iran

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4089 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Question of the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty as Related to Iran
Nishant Roy
Humanities 10E

Examine the process and implications of the development of nuclear research program in Iran and the reaction of the USA. Your answer must take into consideration the
Concept of National Sovereignty and the Nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty.

The Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is an international treaty that aims to contain and bring an end to the spread of nuclear weapons and technology. It also aims to boost cooperation and collaboration in ensuring the peaceful and proper use of nuclear energy, and to fulfill the goal of nuclear, as well as general disarmament. This treaty guarantees its signatories the right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes such as an alternate source of power for its citizens. Non Nuclear Weapon States that have signed the NPT have a flawless record of not building nuclear weapons. (Wikipedia - NPT) Worldwide, 190 nations have ratified it till date, including the five original nuclear weapon states - USA, Russian Federation, France, China and United Kingdom. It is the most widely ratified arms limitation agreement in the world. (UN News Center)

The Treaty established the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The safeguards laid down by the treaty are verified through inspections conducted by the IAEA. The safeguards ensure peaceful use of nuclear technology, equal access to nuclear technology for all signatory nations, and they prevent the spread of nuclear material to be used as weapons. (UN News Center)

National sovereignty is the quality of having complete authority over a geographic territory. This means that a sovereign state has complete power over its territory. It is the supreme lawmaking authority in the area. If another country, organization or body intervenes in an attempt to modify the laws of a sovereign state, it is a violation of national sovereignty. (Wikipedia - Sovereignty) A major question on a lot of people’s minds today is whether America’s harsh



Cited: Anishchuk, Alexei. "Russia Opposes Oil Sanctions against Iran." Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 11 Jan. 2012. Web. 11 May 2012. . Gordts, Eline. "Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader, Says U.S. May Need Force Against Iran." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 05 Mar. 2012. Web. 13 May 2012. . Iranian Underground Nuclear Facility Comes Online. Dir. NewsyWorld. YouTube. YouTube, 09 Jan. 2012. Web. 14 May 2012. . "Iran 's Nuclear Program (Nuclear Talks, 2012)." The New York Times. 12 May 2012. Web. 12 May 2012. . Kapila, Subhash. "IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAMME: THE WESTERN OPPOSITION IS MORE GEO-POLITICAL THAN LEGAL." South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG). South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG), 27 Sept. 2005. Web. 14 May 2012. . Ratnesar, Romesh. "The Economic Fallout From Bombing Iran." Bloomberg Businessweek. Bloomberg, 08 Mar. 2012. Web. 12 May 2012. . Risen, James. "Seeking Nuclear Insight in Fog Of the Ayatollah 's Utterances." The New York Times. The New York Times, 14 Apr. 2012. Web. 14 May 2012. . "Russia Slams New Sanctions against Iran." CNN. 22 Nov. 2011. Web. 14 May 2012. . "U.S. Sanctions against Iran." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 05 Nov. 2012. Web. 13 May 2012. . Zakaria, Tabassum, and Mark Hosenball. "Special Report: Intel Shows Iran Nuclear Threat Not Imminent." Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 01 Mar. 0023. Web. 13 May 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In late 1979, the US was shaken by Iran’s seizure of American hostages and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The latter event in particular was seen as a direct threat to Persian Gulf oil. President Carter, after a period of vacillation, used his 1980 State of the Union speech to lay out an explicit pledge to defend the Gulf by arms. His words: “An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary,…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolfsthal. B. John. (july 2008). American Foreign Policy Project Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions and American Security. Wolfsthal, J. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://americanforeignpolicy.org/iran-key-documents/key-supporting-analyses…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rouhani? What is his goal? What does he pursue with his atomic program, and is it…

    • 1773 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hoomad M. (2012). Iran Cannot be Stopped with Sanctions Retrieved on February 22nd 2014 from…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just recently, politicians in the United States praised the treaty with Iran, but the public found many issues with it. Such as, the twenty-four-hour warning on when they are to make "surprise visits" to the Iranian nuclear facilities (Brookhiser). Furthering the American and Iranian tension, Iran's greatest leaders are now struggling to approach how they are going to make a peace treaty with their great enemy. "We have announced that we will not negotiate with the Americans on any issue other than the nuclear case," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader said, "prepare for the continuation of the fight against America” (Erdbrink). Iran announces that it will only make deals with the United States on nuclear weapons in the hope of it leading to a friendlier relationship between Iran and other countries…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bakhash, Shaul, and Robin Wright. “The U.S. and Iran: An Offer They Can’t Refuse?” Foreign Policy, no. 108 (1997): 124-137. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1149094.…

    • 7054 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research paper

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1.)"Invasion of Iran." Gale Encyclopedia of World History: War. Detroit: Gale, 2009. Student Resources In Context. Web. 13 May 2013.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Bureau of Public Affairs. “Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty”. U.S. Department of State. The U.S. Government. Web. January 26, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    iran nuclear deal

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    operating nuclear plants which have to be supplied with fuel rods. Of now Iran has…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military insurgents

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    strategies the Iranian government has been trying to employ against the US and its allies. The lecture…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two treaties put into effect over the past 20 years have set limits on the testing of nuclear weapons . The Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963, which has been signed by more than 120 nations prohibits nuclear explosions in the atmosphere ,oceans and the space, allowing only them underground .The Thresh hold Test Ban Treaty of 1976, a bilateral agreement between the US and the USSR, prohibits underground tests of nuclear weapons with a yield greater than 150 kilotons. In the present climate of widespread pressure for more effective control of nuclear arms the idea of a comprehensive ban on all nuclear testing is receiving renewed attention.Such an agreement would be an important measure.It might inhibit the development of new weapons by the major nuclear powers, and it might also help to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons technology to other countries.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The affirmative value for this case will be Human Life. Human life is defined as a personal life, the course of an individual's life, especially when viewed as the sum of personal choices contributing to one's personal identity. Being secure is ones right to live in the fundamental need of humankind. Life is a value, and without it, we cannot fully engage in the pursuit of other, secondary societal values, such as justice, equality, or liberty. Nuclear weapons threaten human life and countries around the world shall not possess it. This leads to my criterion, which is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is defined as the doctrine that actions are right if they are useful or for the benefit of a majority. Utilitarianism states that in moral decision, we shall do whatever action will produce the greatest number of people. A future where life is constantly threatened by a nuclear weapon attack or accident is the best option for humankind. Only when countries agree to get rid of nuclear weapons, it is when the world will be in peace.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Terror

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As technology advanced, countries struggled for power in an arms and space race throughout the Cold War in 1947. The United States was facing conflict with the Soviet Union, but still provided assistance to Iran and Iraq. America offered support by pressuring reform on Iran, which was suffering from a collapsing economy and a failing regime.1 According to Lisa Wolfe Iran did not fully embrace the support, “Misperception of US motives behind the move for internal change led many to ignore the fact that the US cared about Iran’s domestic politics only so far as they impacted the superpower’s own national interest.”1 The people of Iran believed the United States only had their own good intentions in mind. The United States did take the Iraqi side during the Iran-Iraq War, but China provided Iran with 22 percent of its arms.1 Iran was not at a complete disadvantage in the war, they had a form…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, another legal measure which shows the effectiveness in maintaining world order are Multilateral treaties. These treaties are an international agreement involving three or more parties. The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was signed in 1968 in Washington, London, Moscow and came into force in 1970 when it was ratified by a sufficient number of nations. The treaty aimed to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world. A deal was made, saying that countries lacking nuclear weapons promised not to develop them if the five nations that did possess them at the time (USA, Russia, China, Britain and France) agreed to gradually reduce the number of weapons that they held. The members of this treaty optimistically agreed, furthering this by adopting another treaty called the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty which would eliminate nuclear weapons, support nuclear free zones and give security assurance to all nations. However, despite five weeks of negotiations, nothing was achieved an no final document was produced. Unless the leaders of the world’s major powers show more political and moral commitments to the cause of nuclear disarmament, the NPT will collapse and possibly lead to an increase…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays