Iran's Nuclear Program

Powerful Essays
Introduction “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue. Before I go any farther, I want to preface my paper with a disclaimer or two. First, I personally do not believe that Iran, as it currently stands, should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Iran’s rulers are religious extremists, and they pose a serious threat to the western world. However, I will strive to present an unbiased review of the issue. Secondly, this paper is not meant to be an exhaustive examination of the topic of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. I am a college freshman at the University of Alaska Anchorage, and I wrote this paper for my English 111 class. As such, I had a very limited time period in which I could research Iran and nuclear

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Iran’s nuclear program and nuclear weapons have grown exponentially since 2003 threatening Middle-Eastern countries and America. Iran has had a nuclear program since the 1950’s when the U.S. helped launch it as part of the Atoms For Peace program. But since then, the program has grown with out regulation from the I.A.E.A.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of Iran developing a nuclear weapon has undoubtedly sparked up an international debate on both sides of the isle. While many in the west debate about which actions to take to prevent the development of the bomb or if Iran is even developing the bomb other countries like Russian and China have been reluctant to criticize. From a western perspective we have to decide whether or not a patient diplomacy is the best approach to Iran’s nuclear problem or not. The consequences of attacking Iran could prove to be just as disastrous as not attacking Iran and being threatened by ban attack. In “Taking Side” two scholars on this issue debate this very question. Christopher Hemmer, from “Responding to a Nuclear Iran” and Norman Podhoretz, editor-at-large for the opinion journal “Commentary” argue on both sides of the issue. This is a general overview of the situation, a summary of each authors main points and a conclusion based on my own opinion.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debacle between the U.S.A and Iran started many years ago with the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979, before that they had rather good relations. Iran’s nuclear activities present a particularly acute security challenge. A nuclear-armed Iran would present a direct threat to U.S. friends, allies and wellbeing in the region and destabilize an already delicate…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tannenwald, N., (1999) ‘The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-use’ International Organization 53(3): 433-48…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first week of August 1945, the world saw the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare. America’s use of the atomic bombs on Japan, resulted in the death of over 130,000 people and caused unpredicted effects on physical health. In relation today we face ongoing issues of terrorism and the possibility of dirty bombs being deployed in the U.S. The problem is the U.S. government has an inadequate system for preventing the wrong…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran Country Assessment

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Islamic Republic of Iran is a country governed by a regime that began with a revolution headed by Ayatollah Khomeini over two decades ago. Khomeini was the first to label the United States as the ‘Great Satan.’ Although the Iranian government denies it, terrorism has been actively supported, both materially and morally, for years by Iran and Iran supports efforts damaging to the U.S. If the more extreme elements in Iran continue to hold power and arm themselves with nuclear weapons, the international repercussions would be far-reaching. Understanding of Iran is important for members of the U.S. Armed Forces in order to comprehend the scope of Iran’s extremist’s leanings. On the other hand, many of Iran’s citizens love the United States and are resentful of Iran’s oppressive regime. The anti democracy and hindrance of personal liberty have taken a large toll on the Iranian youth. Iran’s younger generation has put forth a lot of resistance against this oppressive regime. Over two thirds of Iran’s population is under the age of 30, which is good from an operational standpoint. This massive amount of young people generally feels that there is hope to moderate if not remove the oppressive regime. Recently a few young Iranians have been frustrated to the point of actively demonstrating against the regime. It is also important to mention many younger Iranians want improved relations with the United States. Most urban Iranians have access to the Internet and satellite television and are able to compare their standard of living with that of the United States and Western Europe.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trumans Decision

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harry Truman had said, “It seems to be the most terrible thing ever discovered, but it can be made the most useful.” The atomic bomb was a weapon for destruction but also for peace. Truman had a conflict between invading Japan or to drop the atomic bomb; which then led to the saving of countless lives and the end of World War II. This paper addresses the background of the atomic bomb, the options America had, and why it was necessary.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regardless of General Grove’s speech to the world in 1962 that the use of the world’s most destructive weapon was completely justified, there are still many main factors which were available to the United States and its allies. This marked the birth of the nuclear age which was to last for decades to come. It brought death and destruction…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think that nuclear power can provide low-cost energy which can easily substitute oil and the other common sources of energy. In addition to this, nuclear weapons are considered the only instrument which can make possible the maintenance of word peace. The nuclear problem is complex and difficult to analyze without any kind of prejudices. First of all, it is true that nuclear power can provide a huge amount of energy to every city in the world, but we also should consider…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cold War Essay Outline

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thesis: Hostility from the West and East led to the stockpiling of nuclear weapons necessary to safeguard their interest that evolved since 1945.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nuclear Paradox

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    60 years and some 23,000 nuclear warheads later, since the bombing of Hiroshima, the question that faces the U.S and their allies alike “is less how a nation might array its nuclear forces and more how to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons from spinning out of control”. The very nuclear weapons created to deter attack and ultimately bring about peace are also the cause for ambiguity among world nations, the hole in which millions of tax payers dollars are cast, and the heart of unease felt worldwide by those who fear their amazing destructive power in the wrong hands. The national vision of peace has been misconstrued and wrapped the Americas in a paradoxical ideology of safety that has allowed us to live in “a peace that is no peace”, trapped in the middle of a world wide “Mexican Standoff”.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    My aim of writing this article is basically not to argue for or against nuclear weapons but perhaps to write about my opinions, reactions, and the environmental impact of nuclear weapons on human lives and non-living organisms on this planet earth; our beautiful environment that make life sustainable. Of course, the impact of nuclear bombs has the capacity or potential of being so catastrophic that it needs to be seriously discussed.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, stated in one of his speeches that “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury,”. This bellicose statement is extremely significant and one that should not be dismissed or ignored. America is quite open with the fact that it recognizes Israel as a country and looks upon Israel as its biggest ally in the Middle East . America clearly fits into the category of one of the countries that in Mahmoud Ahmadinejad words, “will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation”. Many believe the concept of Iran destroying America and Israel is farfetched and impossible. However as each day passes Iran gets closer to having the nuclear power to achieve this “impossible idea”. Iran claims that their nuclear program is not to be used to make nuclear weapons. However America and many other countries cannot trust that claim and do nothing while Iran develops its nuclear capabilities. Iran’s nuclear program must be stopped immediately to insure the security of America , Israel and many other countries. We cannot remain complacent and believe the words of a man who has often proclaimed that he would be happy to see the demise of an entire country and its inhabitants. A man that openly denies the Holocaust on national television, and once stated that “ Iran can recruit hundreds of suicide bombers a day. Suicide is an invincible weapon, Suicide bombers in this land showed us the way and they enlighten our future”. How can we believe a man who supports suicide bombers who give up there their own lives to kill innocent men women and children ? Ahmadinejad’s reference to “suicide bombers in this land” alludes to the Iran-Iraq war in which thousands of young Iranians were used a human weapons. In his article “Suicide bombing as Worship: Dimensions of Jihad” author Denis McEoin writes that:“It was a real-life…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    For the past thirty years, Iran and North Korea have been trying to develop and design a nuclear warhead, nowadays; American spies say that Iran has built a Uranium enrichment plant on Qum. Uranium enrichment is the hardest step in order to produce nuclear weapon, and North Korea has already tested nuclear weapons the past years. This is a way to prove that nuclear proliferation keeps increasing in the world and this could balance the world power in a negative way. If states that are directly against each other keep increasing their nuclear arsenal, the world could be ruled or at least influenced by an unstable military power determined by actions made with nuclear weapons. By now, only the strongest military and economic nations possess nuclear warheads and these countries maintain good political and democratic relations between each others except India and Pakistan. The fact that only this nations own nuclear weapons keep the world safe because they know that they will not use those weapons, however many nations such us Iran North Korea and Libya have been trying to obtain one for the past years. No matter what the U.N does, proliferation keeps increasing and new nations try to obtain nuclear warheads, in addition, the more nuclear bombs are in the world the easiest is to trade them among terrorist, in the past years several terrorist groups have been involved in trading nuclear arms in the black market. This is why if Nations Like Iran, North Korea And Libya continue to try to produce nuclear energy to use it as bombs warheads the world’s security can became unstable, because “Only if we abolish nuclear weapons and permanently halt the nuclear power industry we can hope to survive,” and like this avoid terrorist bands which are one of the world’s biggest security concern to acquire nuclear arms from the black market.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays