Postmodernism, Hyperreality and
the Hegemony of Spectacle in New Hollywood:
The Case of The Truman Show
After the screening of The Matrix on its first release, a dear cousin of mine, film connoisseur and avid fan of classical movies, spontaneously made the following comment: “This is an entirely new cinema to me!” If anything, The Matrix is a clear marker of cultural change. A film with state-of-the-art production values like this is bound to elicit in us the belated realization of how slow our response has been to the cultural products of an entirely transformed film industry, that of New Hollywood. My cousin’s casual and unwitting remark reflects the embarrassment felt by both professional critic and layman alike in coping with contemporary movies, especially when we still tend to approach New Hollywood products with the standards of the Old Hollywood cinema. Because of our adherence to tradition, we still tend to look for those classical values of “development”, “coherence” and “unity” in narratives only to find with disappointment that narrative plots become thinner, that characters are reduced to one-dimensional stereotypes and that action is carried through by loosely-linked sequences, built around spectacular stunts, dazzling stars and special effects. “Narrative complexity is sacrificed on the altar of spectacle” (Buckland 166) as today’s blockbusters turn out to be nothing but calculated exercises in profit-making, all high-concept, high-gloss and pure show. Similar cries of warning about the loss of narrative integrity to cinematic spectacle have been voiced at different periods, usually at times of crisis or change in the history of the American cinema. One could cite, for example, Bazin’s disdain at the “displacement of classicism” by the baroque style, marking the end of the pure phase of classical cinema.1 His coined term, “superwestern, ”designates the “emergence of a new kind of western” (Krämer 290), that, according to Bazin, “would be ashamed to be just itself, and looks for some additional interest to justify its existence—an aesthetic, sociological, moral, psychological, political, or erotic interest” (150-1). Similarly, in 1957 Manny Farber, taking his cue from Bazin’s superwestern, laments the “disappearance of this [classical] production system and the closing of action-oriented neighborhood theaters in the 1950s”. He claims that directors like Howard Hawks “who had flourished in ‘a factory of unpretentious picture-making’ were pushed towards artistic self-consciousness, thematic seriousness, and big-budget spectacle “(Krämer 293, emphasis added). A decade later, Pauline Kael too expresses her fears at the disintegration of filmic narrative which she attributes to the abrasion of traditional film production in general. She laments not only the emphasis on “technique” “purely visual content,” and “open-ended, elaborate interpretations” of the experimental and innovative art film of the New American Cinema, but as Krämer puts it, she was equally critical of the experiences facilitated by Hollywood’s mainstream releases. The lack of concern for coherent storytelling on the part of producers and directors in charge of the volatile and overblown process of filmmaking was matched by the audience’s enthusiastic response to spectacular attractions and shock effects, irrespective of their degree of narrative motivation. (296)
Voices of dissatisfaction were heard at another major turn in the history of Hollywood, that is in the late 1970s, when the “unprecedented box-office success of Jaws (1975) and Star Wars (1977), signaled Hollywood’s aesthetic, cultural and industrial re-orientation towards movies with more emphasis on special effects and cinematic spectacle” (Krämer 301). Unlike the classical movies produced on the assembly line under the studio regime (films that respected narrative integrity and refined story ideas into the classical three-act of exposition, complication and...
Cited: Balio, Tino ed. (1985). The American Film Industry. Madison: U of Wisconsin P.
Barthes, Roland (1975) The Pleasure of the Text. New York: Hill and Wang.
Baudrillard, Jean (1983c). “Ecstacy of Communication”. In The Anti-Aesthetic. Ed. Hal Foster. Port Townsend, WA: Bay P. 126-34.
Baudrillard, Jean (1983a). Simulations. New York: Semiotext (e).
Baudrillard, Jean (1988a). The Ecstacy of Communication. New York: Semiotext (e).
Baudrillard, Jean (1993). Symbolic Exchange and Death. London: Sage.
Bazin, Andre (1967). “The Evolution of the Western”. In What is Cinema? Vol. II. Ed. Hugh Gray. Berkeley: U of California P. 149-157.
Benjamin, Walter (1968). “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”. In Illuminations. Ed. W. Benjamin. New York: Harcourt. 219-53 (originally published 1955).
Bernardoni, James (1991). The New Hollywood: What the Movies Did with the New Freedom of the Seventies. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.
Bolton, Chris (1998). “The Truman Show”. Http:// www. 24framespersecond.com.
Bordwell, David, Staiger Janet and Thompson, Kristin (1985). The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. London: Routledge.
Brisset, Dennis and Edgley, Charles (1990). Life as Theater: A Dramaturgical Sourcebook. 2nd ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Buckland, Warren (1988). “A Close Encounter with Raiders of the Lost Arc: Notes on Narrative Aspects of the New Hollywood Blockbuster”. In Contemporary Hollywood Cinema. Eds. Steve Neale and Murray Smith. London and New York: Routledge.
Business Data for The Truman Show (1998). Http:// us.imdb.com.
Cannon, Damian (1998). “The Truman Show (1998)” Movie Reviews UK 2000. Http:// www. film.u-net.com.
Clisby, Heather (1998). “The Truman Show”. Movie Magazine International. Http:// www. shoestring.org.
Cook, Pam and Bernink, Mieke (1999). The Cinema Book. 2nd ed. BFI Publishing.
Corliss, Richard (1998). “Truman Burbank’s Wonderful Life”. Time Magazine 151. 21 (June 1). Http:// www. email@example.com.
Corrigan, Timothy (1991). A Cinema Without Walls: Movies and Culture after Vietnam. London: Routledge.
Debord, Guy (1967). Society of the Spectacle. Paris: Editions Champ Libre.
Denzin, Norman K. (1991) Images of Postmodern Society: Social Theory and Contemporary Cinema. London: Sage.
Denzin, Norman K. (1995). The Cinematic Society: The Voyeur’s Gaze. London: Sage.
Ebert, Roger (1998). “The Truman Show”. Chicago Sun Times. Http:// www. suntimes.com.
Featherstone, Mike (1995). Undoing Culture: Globalization, Postmodernism and Identity. London: Sage.
Friedberg, Anne (1993). Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley: U of California P.
Goffman, Erving (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Gomery, Douglas (1983). “The American Film Industry in the Seventies: Stasis in the ‘New Hollywood’.” Wide Angle 5.4: 52-9.
Gomery Douglas (1998). “Hollywood as Industry”. In The Oxford Guide to Film Studies. Eds. John Hill and Pamela Church Gibson. Oxford: Oxford UP. 245-54.
Guthmann, Edward (1998). “Remote Control Jim Carrey is a Born TV Star in The Truman Show”. San Francisco Chronicle. Http://www.sfgate.com.
Harvey, David (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hillier, Jim (1992). The New Hollywood. London: Studio Vista.
Jameson, Fredric (1991). Postmodernism: Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.
Kauffmann, Stanley (1998). “Stanley Kauffmann on Films: Caught in the Act”. The New Republic. Http:// www. thenewrepublic.com.
Krämer, Peter (1998). “Post-Classical Hollywood Film: Concepts and Debates”. In The Oxford Guide to Film Studies. Eds. John Hill and Pamela Church Gibson. Oxford: Oxford UP. 289-309.
Lash, Scott (1988). “Discourse or Figure? Postmodernism as a ‘Regime of Signification’.” Theory, Culture & Society 5: 311-36.
Lyman, Stanford (1990). “Anhedonia: Gender and the Decline of Emotions in American Film, 1930-1988”. Sociological Inquiry 60: 1-19.
Leong, Anthony (1998). “The Truman Show”. The Eyepiece Network. Http:// www. eyepiece.com.
McHale, Brian (1987). Postmodernist Fiction. London and New York: Methuen.
Meehan, Eileen R. (1991). “ ‘Holly Commodity Fetish, Batman!’: The Political Economy of a Commercial Intertext.” In The Many Lives of Batman. Eds. Roberta Pearson and William Urrichio. New York: Routledge. 47-65.
Miller, Mark Crispin (1990). “Hollywood: the Ad”. Atlantic Monthly (April): 49-52.
Monaco, James (1981). How to Read a Film: The Art, Technology, Language, History and Theory of Film and Media. New York: Oxford UP.
Neale, Steve and Murray Smith (1998). Contemporary Hollywood Cinema. London and New York: Routledge.
Ray, Robert B. (1985). A Certain Tendency of the Hollywood Cinema: 1930-1980. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP.
Release Dates for The Truman Show (1998). Http:// us.imdb.com.
Romney, Jonathan (1998). “The New Paranoia: Games Pixels Play.” Film Comment 34.6 (Nov. Dec.): 39-43.
Schatz, Thomas (1993). “The New Hollywood.” In Film Theory Goes to the Movies. Eds. Jim Collins, Hilary Radner, and Ava Preacher Collins. London and New York: Routledge. 8-36.
Schickel, Richard (1989). “The Crisis in Movie Narrative.” Gannett Center Journal 3 (Summer): 1-15.
Shulgasser, Barbara (1998). “Carrey rings true in The Truman Show: He’s blessedly restrained in comic fairy tale about everyman whose life is a TV show”. San Francisco Examiner. Htpp:// www. sfgate.com.
Sobchack, Vivian (1994). “Towards a Phenomenology of Cinematic and Electronic Presence: The Scene of the Screen.” Post-Script 10 (Fall): 50-59.
Sobchack, Vivian (1992). The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP.
Stam, Robert and Miller, Toby (2000). Film and Theory: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Telotte, J.P. (1999) “Verhoeven, Virilio, and ‘Cinematic Derealization;.” Film Quarterly 53.2 (Winter): 30-8.
The Truman Show (1998). Dir. Peter Weir. Scp. Andrew Niccol. w. Jim Carrey, Laura Linney, Noah Emmerich, Natascha McElhone, Ed Harris. Paramount/Viacom.
Turner, Graeme (1988). Film as Social Practice. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
Virilio, Paul (1994). The Vision Machine. London: BFI and Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana UP.
Wasko, Janet (1994). Hollywood in the Information Age: Beyond the Silver Screen. Cambridge: Polity P.
Whitehouse, Charles (1998). “Bubble Boy.” Sight and Sound 8 (Summer): 9-10.
Zelevinski, Vladimir V. “The Truman Show: Jim Carrey Isn’t All Fun and Games”. The Tech 118.28 (18 June 1998), (www.tech.mit.edv).
Please join StudyMode to read the full document