Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Political Sociology

Powerful Essays
2309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Sociology
Capitalism is the Problem:
Workers’ Socialist Revolution is the Solution For decades now the whole working class has been under attack. Blacks, Latinos and immigrants have been hardest hit by economic and racist attacks. Outbreaks of resistance have been infrequent and limited. Overt class struggle has been pretty well contained. But even though most workers don’t recognize it today, big working-class fight backs are not only possible -- they are inevitable. Such massive struggles, which our transit strike began to hint at, are absolutely terrifying to the capitalists. In fact, the bosses would love for class struggle to just be considered an “old-fashioned” notion from the past. However, in the light of recent experience, a good number of transit workers are already thinking about the need for “class struggle.” It’s the key to what our lives are going to be like, and will make the difference for future generations as well. The great bulk of people would vastly prefer to live in a world free of poverty, unemployment, racism and war. This kind of world, which really does put human need before profit, is only possible under socialism. Many workers today, including the racially oppressed and the poorest sectors, would readily agree that this is the kind of world they would want for themselves and future generations. But they think it’s a pipedream. When they are able to experience their own power in united mass actions that win victories, they will begin to see that our class can turn this vision into a reality.
The Marxist view of capitalism and the working class The class struggle -- the conflict between the capitalists and the workers -- is at the very heart of the capitalist system. It explains how it works and where it is going. This scientific understanding was first explained by Karl Marx. The capitalist class makes profits at the expense of the working class’s wages and living standards, so the two sides are inevitably driven into conflict. The workers create the wealth and the bosses take the lion’s share. Capitalism has always been brutal in its methods. But it developed technology and a worldwide system of production which laid the material basis or groundwork for overcoming scarcity and creating abundance for all. People could have everything they need to live well. But it’s impossible to achieve under the capitalist system, which is driven to pursue profits rather than human needs. Therefore, as Karl Marx pointed out, only a workers’ or proletarian socialist revolution could bring about a society of abundance for all . By the birth of the twentieth century it became apparent that capitalism was no longer a progressive system on a world scale. Development could now only happen in one sector at the expense of other economic sectors. For example, it could develop the productive forces but only through imperialism, which looted and superexploited the peoples of the economically backward countries. And even in the economically advanced countries, inter-imperialist wars, depressions and fascism confirmed that the system had become reactionary. Another major depression leading to fascism and a Third World War will now become inevitable if revolution doesn’t stop it in time. Previous historic systems like feudalism and other more primitive societies were overthrown when they outlived their usefulness and could no longer bring humanity forward. Likewise the capitalist system is now retarding further advances for humanity. However, what is striking about capitalism is that it developed the modern working class, which is now the class positioned to bring about its overthrow. Just like workers make the transit system run, it is the overall working class which allows the economic system as a whole to run. Nothing can be built or moved without us. As well, the vast majority of workers have no real stake in maintaining capitalism because we don’t own any means of production or businesses; we aren’t bosses. Indeed, workers have to sell their labor power to the bosses in exchange for paychecks. As the fundamental source of their profits, our strategic economic position gives the working class the power to forge decisive change. By using our power and by learning through big struggles and the lessons of the class struggles that went before us, workers develop advanced or revolutionary class consciousness. This consciousness means not only the ability to take the working-class side on the immediate issues. It also means understanding our need and ability to organize to overturn the capitalist state, and create our own workers’ state on the road to socialism. If the capitalist state, ruled by the capitalist class, was overthrown by the workers, it would mean creating a new state ruled by the working class and oppressed people. This new state would nationalize the banks and corporations, without compensating the bosses, and would set us on the path of creating socialism. It would mean full employment, decent guaranteed health care, housing, education and retirement for all, and a program of public works and re-industrialization of the economy. Technology would not mean layoffs but reduced hours of work with no loss in pay. Socialism can only be built upon abundance -- which could only be achieved by pooling the combined industrial power and resources of many countries, not just one country alone. And so a revolutionary society would plan for international cooperation based on supporting socialist revolutions elsewhere and the creation of federations of workers’ states. Over time, the material basis for every form of oppression would be removed. Racism, sexism, and hostilities against different nationalities would die out over time, since there would be no need for vicious combat among workers, who are all forced to fight each other for the miserable jobs and other crumbs that capitalism offers us.
Working-class power is the key There are good reasons for workers’ current skepticism about the power of our class to lead a fight against capitalist attacks. AsRTW consistently points out, the biggest reason is the current misleaders of the working class, like Roger Toussaint and the rest of the union bureaucrats. They have engineered decades of defeat for the working class. It is they who have made us feel powerless to change things. They work overtime to hold back workers’ struggle and prevent us from exercising and recognizing our own class strength. When they are forced to call some struggles, they try to limit them and prevent them from spreading. This happened with our strike most blatantly. And since then, transit workers have seen more obvious barriers to further struggle thrown up by Toussaint and his partners-in-betrayal. But it is also true that even under misleadership, partial victories are more than possible. In fact those victories are exactly what will give workers the confidence to go even further. Thus revolutionary workers fight hard alongside our fellow workers to build successful class struggles today, and especially to build the fighting unity of the whole working class. That is the best way for more workers to see their own power in action. There is no need to “instigate” our fellow workers: it is the conditions of capitalism itself which eventually force workers to act to defend ourselves, to engage in mass fightbacks. This is what happened in the 1930’s and in a different way with the return of a recession in the early 70’s. Workers became confident and were radicalized in great numbers. The working class searches for its own alternative to capitalism only when it knows its own strength to actually achieve big changes.
Stalinism versus socialism A further barrier to constructing the workers’ alternative is confusion about what socialism actually is. This is not accidental: it is the legacy of the greatest historic setback for the revolutionary movement, the overturn of the workers’ revolution in Russia. That revolution had been led by Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. In 1919 the revolutionaries of the Soviet Union, the Bolsheviks, joined with revolutionary workers around the world to form what was called the Third International, dedicated to leading the socialist revolutions developing in other countries. But the Soviet Union became isolated, as reformist misleaderships played a decisive role in betraying other revolutions, such as in Germany. Under those conditions, a faction arose inside Russia and the Third International, which rejected proletarian (workers’) internationalism rather than fight for international revolution. The faction was led by Stalin, who justified his actions with the theory that socialism could be built in one country alone. He succeeded in gaining the leadership in Russia and of the International. In the hands of Stalin and his followers, the Third International turned to betraying revolutions in other countries. By the end of the 1930’s, this leadership had restored capitalism in the Soviet Union itself. Trotsky and his followers formed a Fourth International, based on Marx and Lenin’s understanding of the need for working-class internationalism, to fight Stalin’s betrayals. But Stalinism, a totalitarian system which actually used fake socialist or communist parties and rhetoric to suppress the working class, became dominant for an important historic period. With the economic collapse of the Soviet Union and its satellites from 1989 through the early 90’s, many workers concluded that socialism had failed. In reality Stalinism never had anything in common with authentic internationalist socialism. It was rather just a statified form of national capitalism. The fall of Stalinism created an opening for workers internationally to start re-discovering authentic Marxism, which is now also called Trotskyism.
Capitalism intensifies its attacks Today capitalism is on a global offensive that is wiping out past gains. As profit margins have fallen in the system as a whole, competition between capitalist firms and nations has become ever more vicious. The “race to the bottom” in which capitalists try to outdo each other in finding the cheapest labor possible is prevalent. At root this is an intensified method of capitalist class struggle by the bosses. A greater and greater part of this drive is the super-exploitation of workers in poorer, neo-colonial countries, backed by different forms of covert intervention and control -- and overt imperialist military intervention such as in Iraq. No surprise that masses have already rebelled against this system internationally, and in a number of cases, like that of the Iraqi resistance, they have put U.S. imperialism in a bind. It is becoming more difficult for the major imperialists, particularly the U.S., to simply dictate terms abroad. The U.S. rulers are also well aware of the need to escalate the attacks against workers and the poor at home. Much of the working class is facing layoffs and cutbacks based on firms threatened by closures, bankruptcy or the like. But even companies with healthy profit margins, like Exxon and Wal-Mart, are expert at maintaining low wages in the U.S. while sucking the blood out of workers in other countries. (This in fact is a large part of why they are profitable.) In short, much of the working class is stuck in low-wage jobs and has little in the way of health care and retirement plans. A key focus of these recent attacks has been pensions -- for workers who have them. Pension funds have been underfunded for years. The stock market boom of the 90’s hid the fact that the bosses weren’t meeting their fund obligations with hard cash. When stocks went down, the funds ended up short of cash. Now the bosses are demanding that workers either pay into the pension funds themselves, accept inferior plans or give up on their claims. A similar cruel pattern is at work with health plans. Transit workers are in better shape than most workers, because of their strategic position and immediate factors like the surplus the MTA ran this past year. But the MTA, like the government as a whole, is burdened with an enormous debt, and therefore with huge interest payments it has to make to the banks and Wall Street. In the face of this fiscal reality, and in the context of a system moving toward greater austerity for the masses of people, transit workers, like others, will face threats of layoffs and other cutbacks in the future that are worse than what is already afoot. The needs of the ruling class to boost profit rates also dictates escalated racist and anti-immigrant attacks across the board -- to keep the working class down through divide-and-conquer methods. And it produced the horror of man-made disasters like Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath, where masses of mainly Black and poor working-class people on the Gulf Coast died because of contemptuous neglect by the capitalist system. Given capitalism’s necessary priorities, the desperate plight of joblessness and homelessness perpetrated by the government’s lack of response to Katrina is the future for many others as well -- if capitalism is allowed to continue. And the growing capitalist rivalries internationally will mean the development of massive military conflicts beyond what already exists, up to and including a Third World War and the destruction of civilization as we know it. Only the working class, through socialist revolution, can stop this nightmare. We argue that socialism is the only solution. But the socialist perspective in no way means that we should not fight to build a defense against the immediate attacks today. On the contrary, it is absolutely necessary, and revolutionaries make the very best fighters for today’s struggle. But in order to fight most effectively, workers also have to understand that there can be no lasting concessions from the capitalist system. To win security and abundance for all, the working class will have to take matters into our own hands. In order to both win our battles today and build toward this future socialist revolution, we urge interested workers to get in touch with the LRP, to learn more about the strategy, tactics and history of our movement.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The choice to begin with the procession offers a juxtaposition of ideals, one where the people are standing on common ground and then as the book continues on we are taken on a journey that shows the divide between the people, particularly within their classes. Within the pages, information is drawn about different labor unions and the people who influenced them and this is where its success draws from. Green sets the stage for the bombing at the Haymarket which does not take place until more than halfway through the book. He offers a look into what could have caused such violence. Beginning with the eight-hour workday movement which inspired many to fight harder for their right to work, but also receive an education with the time they had hoped to free up. They were met with opposition at almost every turn, from politicians with empty promises to employers with no problem in lowering wages or laying off workers with better conditions in mind.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A need for the for the workers to take control after decades of an oppressed lower class with the higher classes being the ones educated and in control…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Downs, S. (2006). What Happened-and Didn’t: Behind New York’s Transit Strike. Solidarity. Retrieved September 7. 2010 from http://www.solidarity-us.org/node/114…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even as the Courts and Congress enforced suppression of certain ideas and acts, the class war in a supposedly class-less society was beginning to take shape. Strikes continued to plague the country and even with the jailing and suppression of union leadership, the Socialist support of the unions continued to attract more members and sympathy.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has been demonstrated that the makeup of the working class has changed dramatically in the last 200 years. This change is a result of the processes of industrialization, colonialism, and globalization. Industrialization led to proletarianization, which had negative consequences on the working class and as a result, many workers throughout the industrialized world organized to advocate for improved status and conditions. Working class organizations by colonized workers also improved the conditions that these workers faced. However, many of the same issues that the workers in previous time periods faced are still prevalent today, such as precarity and forced labour, as a result of the process of globalization. Therefore, while there have been…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Big to Fail\

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The article “A Movement Too Big to Fail” by Chris Hedges with his criticism of “faux liberal reformers, whose abject failure to stand up for the rights of the poor and the working class, have signed on to this movement because they fear becoming irrelevant”(Hedges) to the reformers along with heads of financial leaders. Through non violent movements and protests against those who threaten the lower class wellbeing, that somehow they as a group gathering for the greater interests can show that others do exist and this is their way of saying that we as a whole united can make a difference and that we as Americans have that right to voice our opinions. It happened in the 1960’s, with the Vietnam war, nonviolent protesting made known that many people of the united states were against the war. Just like what we were doing in the 60s is no different from now, when the “union leaders pull down salaries five times that of their superiors”(Hedges).…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business was thriving, the economy was growing, and life as a whole was improving. However, there was a growing minority of workingmen whose long, difficult hours of toil were being taken advantage of by greedy, selfish employers. These poor men and their malnourished, destitute families compiled the backbone of the thriving economy. Without them, production as a whole would have been at a standstill and the growing quality of life for Americans would have been dampened. Yet these hard-working people received no recognition. On the contrary, they were sorely mistreated by their employers. Threateningly, this problem was growing vaster, until finally workers began to take a stand. Did they make any impact? Did the movement last? Throughout the decades, labor unions have shaped the state of the American economy and the value of the common…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main actors with Conflict theory is the “capitalist class” (for some, known as the elite). The elite class includes individuals and/or groups that are seen as figures/symbols of fortune and power; in addition, these people own the means of production or own the forms of accessing it. The second group involved in this system is the working class (also known as the lower classes), which involves the powerless individuals that have no choice but to sell their labor to the higher class in order to make a living and survive in the real world. I like to see this system as the boss and the ones that work for the boss. The elite are able to maintain power over the working class because the higher class is seen as having more power than the…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the author, there is a new multiracial urban working class that holds the key to transforming urban American. The urban resident who are comprise are Latinos, Asian Pacific Islander, West Indian immigrants, can US born African. Now, tell me have a job that are in the working class. Those jobs are cleaning services, nursing homes, telephone sales, assembling plants, and food processing services. Now, in the world today most people who are under class are working in a retail shop as a employee, babysitter, or cut into neighbor’s lawn for money. But most people in upper working class, are working for Ford Motor Company, Comerica Bank, own a huge company, or Insurance agent. The question to be answer is how the new working class can…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The industrial revolution, a period of transition and innovation, inevitably brought with it changes. Life for both rich and poor was changed. The Industrial Revolution brought about the birth of two classes: The middle class and the working class. In the article “The Communist Manifesto” (1848) by Karl Marx, it states that “Marx saw the oppression of the worker by those who owned means of production.”(1) Did the Industrial Revolution benefit both, or yet cause grievance in one and be beneficial to the other. Where everyone truly aided by the great rise in standard of living? Those are the questions to be asked when contemplating if workers from all classes successfully united to bring about radical change.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In considering Marx as a possible solution, Du Bois analyzes the Marxian concept of the proletariat or laboring class. It is the proletariat, according to Marx, that is exploited by those who own industry and the means of production, what Marx calls the bourgeoisie or the capitalist class. They do this through the exploitation and devaluation of proletarian labor. In analyzing the proletariat here in the United States, Du Bois found that although Black and White labor do make up an exploited class that occupies the same time and space in the workplace and share similar grievances against capitalist exploitation, the Black worker is also subject to discrimination that is purposely directed at him from his fellow White workers. Because of this, Du Bois concluded that Black and White labor do not comprise a unified proletariat and that in fact, Blacks make up a separate and more exploited class of laborer and therefore a true proletariat, while White workers, in an attempt to escape into the wealthy class, have developed into a working aristocracy or petty bourgeoisie class of managers and employers of labor, a sort of buffer class, who attach their…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socialism In 1800s

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1800s Britain, the Industrial Revolution resulted in the development of a new class society. Change in the definition of societal classes is often credited to class feeling, defining society based on a common source of income (Perkin, 176). In the relevance of socialism, it is important to understand the most crucial class in economic and political change: the working class.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Britain's Underclass

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The term “underclass” refers to a group of people that, in some people’s opinions are at the lowest position of the class hierarchy. The underclass has been greatly discussed since the 1960s when Gunner Myrdal referred to them as a “class of unemployed, unemployables and underemployed”, who are more hopelessly set apart from the nation at large and do not share in its life, its ambitions and its achievements (Myrdal, 1963, p.121). Socialists have agreed that there is definitely a group of people at the bottom, but do not agree with why they are there. There are two views, the cultural view, who argue that the underclass are scroungers, dependant on benefits and have no intention of looking for work. Then there is the structural view, who argues that these people are at the bottom of the class system because society put them there, with factors such as poor relatives and very few jobs which can lead to social exclusion.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and its values revolve around material possessions and their acquisition. In this society, the poor man strives to be rich, and a powerless man to gain power. Many of these people however don't have access to these privileges, and so to be one of the few taking the limited seats of wealth and power they compete, most often times against each other. Such environments are not only often times promote conflict but confrontation as well, and many times the winners of these altercations are relishing in "The American Dream" While capitalism promotes the belief that this dream is achievable, it is more often than not, a literal dream, and leaves its pursuers poor, and weak. This keeps the working class powerless, and pacified to propagate capitalistic values.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles," meaning that during and throughout history there is always a constant oppression between the oppressor and oppressed. Each time the fight ends in either a revolutionary reconstruction of society, including a destruction of a particular class.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays