Preview

Polite Profanities

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Polite Profanities
Polite Profanities
There’s no such thing as a polite profanity. If you’re prone to imprecations, maledictions, and naughty words, you may include them in the Great American Novel you’re writing. But they have no place in polite conversation.
It’s not that swearing is “bad” in the sense that if you do it, you’ll go to H-E-double-toothpicks for eternity and never be able to watch MTV again, but there are three reasons why it’s a bad idea:
First, excessive swearing makes your mind go soggy. People who swear all the time are tiresome to listen to. A nine-word vocabulary doesn’t allow for the expression of much insight, wit, intelligence, or empathy. If your speech is lazy, vague, and unimaginative, your mind is sure to follow.
Second, excessive swearing takes the shock value out of profanity. The whole purpose of swearing is to have a few words available for those occasions when all others are insufficient. If you say “&@#&!” when you drop a sandwich, what do you say when an airplane drops a 300-pound block of frozen waste on your foot?
Third, swearing in public is considered impolite because it’s insensitive to the feelings of others. Many people find profanity offensive. It wasn’t that long ago that nobody (except the most vulgar people imaginable) ever swore. To do so in the presence of a lady was unthinkable. Children had their mouths washed out with soap for saying “damn.” Some of us learned very young that Dial tastes better than Ivory Soap.
What’s that you say? “But it’s only words?” Yes, but the images those words conjure up--things one might be full of or be asked to do to oneself or a close relative-- aren’t what most people want playing on their mental multiplexes.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world there are many different views on the use of swear words in everyday life. From evening family slot times to late night tv shows, cursing in society is slowly becoming part of our “normal” day to day language. Whether or not it is accepted is something different. Society has often labeled swearing one of two things: as an extreme type of language only used by the uneducated or the greatest use of power words that should be used by any and all people. Though swearing is offensive to many, it is proven to be a major extension of our vocabulary and should be tolerated and understood to a greater extent.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introducing two opposing forces, a Michigan man and the state of Michigan in a battle of upholding civil rights and a case of profanity. Stephanie Simon, author of the article, “Michigan Man Swears by His right to Use Profanity,” goes to on to discuss a case of man versus state. Simon writes for civil rights advocates explaining the two sides of the case involved with Timothy Boomer and Standish, Michigan. She included a casual tone within her work that was relatable and gave off a feeling of familiarity that allowed the readers to be more at ease. Furthermore, her explanation was strong as the article was resourceful, including multiple reliable sources within her work. Giving the impression this topic was well prepared and strong.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scott Simmon offers that you should " pick the perfect profanity to season your message". This is the perfect way to explain how often or how much we should use profanity. I agree with Scott Simmon, we should add profanity not pour it. Profanity has power, shows authority and gains attention.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original meaning of “profanity” was restricted to blasphemy. “Blasphemy” was an offensive attack on religion and religious figures, which included swearing in the name of God. As centuries passed, profanity became more distinct from blasphemy. Although blasphemy still refers to language that defames God, a religion or a religious figure, profanity has evolved to include expressions with vulgar, racist and sexual themes.…

    • 928 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Austin Response

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this essay, Elizabeth Austin describes her feelings about the “F” word. She gives a detailed explanation on why it should not be used in the colloquial language. Austin first gives background knowledge about the “F” word and how it came to be as the word it is used now. Austin’s thesis is that the “F” word should not be used in any certain way.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some personal relationships may differ to others or be more important than others with language including restrictions (may include use of foul language and unpleasant expressions) based on trust. Words including swear words or gestures could have different meanings in different personal or social groups.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This analysis first defines profanity. Then, one profanity was selected for analysis. Next, controlling variables that generally occasion the use of the target profanity were outlined. Last, substitutions for the target profanity were evaluated to determine a) whether or not they are controlled by similar controlling variables and b) if they function to produce the same result as the target profanity.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should cussing be socially acceptable or should it remain offensive among present day society? In the article “Cuss Time” by author Jill McCorkle she proposes that cussing should be acceptable in moderation. The article speaks of how it restricts freedom of expression and takes away from thoughts. But that simply cannot be the case though as cuss words really don’t have a place in society now and have never had one before. Society should refrain from repulsive language as it is not acceptable in most environments, it hinders your linguistic ability, although some people argue that it has certain benefits.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    belongs on the list of “four­lettered profanities” that we’re not to say, nor speak of, in public. In…

    • 1323 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the wake of school shootings, cracking down on potential threats has become priority. Not only are there threats of mass violence, but racist speech and sexist speech, that some would define as fighting words. A question to ask is when does speech become a fighting word. Having to decide what speech is protected by the first amendment, worthwhile, and what speech has no social value and is not protected, worthless, is controversial. Speech that is defined as worthless include: lewd, obscene, profane, libelous, and fighting words. Focusing on fighting words and the ever developing world of technology, we will examine a present-day situation of words that wound and compare them to past cases.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    paper

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jill McCorkle grandly gives her son who was eight years old at the time, five minutes a day in which he could cuss and bounce on the couch. When the kitchen timer rang, all the cussing ended until the next day. Jill McCorkle said “I have often thought what a better, more confident person I would have been if only I had grown up with cuss time instead of soap licking.” In response to this it is important now in time to be raised with a voice. McCorkle raised her child to have freedom and potential to do what he wants. Experience creates honesty. Limiting or denying freedom of speech and expression would affect many. McCorkle said, “When character and situation called for it-I did use strong language. I couldn’t imagine a realistic portrait of human nature, particularly in our contemporary society without it”. Strong language does not have to be looked at as being negative all the time. For example if I was to stomp my toe I would react and say “shit” or fuck”. But this does not have to be a negative input.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book The Stuff of Thought (2007), Steven Pinker states that all humans, universally, must be careful in the choice of their words in order to convey a specific message while keeping up a particular relationship between the speaker and the listener. In the simplest form, people do this for basic politeness. Whether it is asking for someone to pass the salt or asking somebody to donate to a specific cause, people phrase their desires in a way to not offend the listener and the upkeep the relationship between the active participants in the conversation. In sexual relations, this fickle formation of speech can be even more complicated. The asker does not want to offend the listener but at the same time, has the courage to attempt to convey their desires to their partner. Politically, the word phrasing game can be even more difficult while also being much more important. Diplomatically in politics, the…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do Words Matter

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Words are no longer simple like what we hear, write or read because of the tremendous effect of them are incredible. In fact, words are powerful since they can hurt or ease pain, build or destroy a person, end war or start one and so on. Therefore, choosing our words wisely is very important.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The young lift-man in a City office who threw a passenger out of his lift the other morning and was fined for the offence was undoubtedly in the wrong. It was a question of 'Please'. The complainant entering the lift, said, 'Top'. The lift-man demanded 'Top-please' and this concession being refused he not only declined to comply with the instruction, but hurled the passenger out of the lift. This, of course was carrying a comment on manner too far. Discourtesy is not a legal offence, and it does not excuse assault and battery. If a burglar breaks into my house and I knock him down, the law will acquit me, and if I am physically assaulted, it will permit me to retaliate with reasonable violence. It does this because the burglar and my assailant have broken quite definite commands of the law, but no legal system could attempt to legislate against bad manners, or could sanction the use of violence against something which it does not itself recognize as a legally punishable offence. And whatever our sympathy with the lift-man, we must admit that the law is reasonable. It would never do if we were at liberty to box people's ears because we did not like their behaviour, or the tone of their voices, or the scowl on their faces. Our fists would never be idle, and the gutters of the City would run with blood all day. I may be as uncivil as I may please and the law will protect me aganist violent retaliation. I may be haughty or boorish and there is no penalty to pay except the penalty of being written down an ill-mannered fellow. The law doesnot compel me to say 'please' or to attune my voice to other people's sensibilities any more than it says that I shall not wax my moustache or dye my hair or wear ringlets down my back. It does not recognize the laceration of our feelings as a case for compensation. There is no allowance for moral and intellectual damages in these matters.…

    • 3192 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays