Preview

Philosophy Reason and Experience Mock

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
275 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy Reason and Experience Mock
‘At birth the mind is a tabula rasa’ Discuss. (30marks)
A tabula rasa is an expression supported by Empiricists, it means that at birth our minds are a blank piece slate, a blank piece of paper in which our sense experience is the scribe. It supports the idea that there are no innate idea’s/concepts or knowledge. John Locke is an Empiricist and a firm believer, he disagrees that we have any a priori/innate ideas or knowledge.
Rene Descartes , a Rationalist philosopher disagrees with this view and believes that we have some innate knowledge, the knowledge that God exists. Descartes believes that the idea of God is innate and it present knowledge at birth. He says that only a being as perfect as God could of put the idea of God in his head. However, Locke argues against this as he says innate knowledge would have to be universal and not everybody, especially different cultures don’t even know who God is and do not have the concept of him. Locke believes there are is no innate knowledge therefore meaning there cannot be any innate ideas
Plato is also a Rationalist and believes we have innate knowledge. He uses ‘evidence’ of Meno, where Socrates and a slave boy who was completely un-educated worked through the math Pythagoras theorem and the boy was able to complete this. However, there are problems with this argument such as the fact the boy was able to complete this through logical reasoning, the knowledge was ‘forced’ out of the boy by leading questions from Socrates. The boy used his personal characteristic of reasoning to complete the mathematical
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    PHIL201 Study Guide Lesson 10
    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PHIL201 Study Guide Lesson 10

    Plato's understanding of knowledge is justified true belief. After rejecting 2 accounts of knowledge (knowledge as perception & knowledge as true belief) , defined as KNOWLEDGE IS SOMETHING SIMILAR TO JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF. (PG. 20)…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Meno's Geometric Argument
    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Meno's Geometric Argument

    In the Meno, Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon a slave, a person who has no formal education and walked him through a geometry problem. This problem was meant to illustrate that a person’s knowledge is not based on what this person has learned in their lifetime but their capacity and ability to understand is based on what their soul has learned in previous lifetimes. Socrates uses this example show his thesis is true but what about different scenarios that aren’t math based and through different problems you can see that Socrates theory is half correct and that there are several implications that prove that souls don’t know it all.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes Trademark Argument
    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rene Descartes Trademark Argument

    It is not obtained through sense perceptions. This is a reason that supports his claim that finite substances, such as the human mind, are not capable of creating such a omnipotent, omnibenevolent, infinite, omniscient God. He goes on to claim that the idea of God is innate, a concept that is present, or “imprinted”, in the human mind from birth. Descartes strongly believes that innate ideas are the necessary things that provide a reliable basis for all metaphysical knowledge. The idea of God is clearly and distinctly perceived. Descartes does admit, however, that he cannot grasp the thought of God’s existence, but that he merely understands it. Due to his conclusion that God ultimately exists, he is now able to trust the external world with…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Locke's Second Treatise of Government
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Locke's Second Treatise of Government

    Locke believed that the mind is blank upon birth. As a person grows and develops, so does their mind. He urged individuals to formulate theories and to test them through experiments. The fundamental claim is that human knowledge begins with sense experience and primarily is derived from it. Locke begins his philosophical examination of knowledge by trying to disprove the claim that some of our knowledge is original, in the sense that it comes from ideas which are innate or inborn. Locke's attempted refutation depends on a questionable assumption: if an individual has an idea, then that individual would understand it and assent to its content.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    True Knowledge - Descartes vs Plato
    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    True Knowledge - Descartes vs Plato

    Many philosophers have tried to figure out what exactly true knowledge is. For years they have been asking questions and looking deep into the mind to better understand the methods needed to get to true knowledge. If we go back to some of the earliest philosophers we meet Plato in Greece. Plato tried to take on the question himself in a fictional conversation he wrote up between Socrates and Meno, and in which we see some insight to what he believes it is. In the conversation Socrates asks the question of what virtue really is. Meno tries to answer by giving a very specific answer as to what virtue was within Greek society of that day, but Socrates then replies that although one who follows what Meno said is considered to be a virtuous person, it still does not define virtue itself. After a while of conversation Meno gets frustrated and gives up, as they could not come to a true definition of virtue. Socrates (Plato) then explains that in order to really know something you have to be able to reason and withhold the Socratic conversation (kind of like a devil’s advocate conversation) in which they discuss the concept at question and bounce back and forth until there is a real answer. Socrates then goes on to say that inside every person’s soul and mind is knowledge they carry with them from their past lives. They know everything already and when they learn it is merely a recollection. True knowledge is really already in our minds but just has to be brought out. Socrates then demonstrates this with a slave and some mathematical equations, but also tries to show the difference between true belief and true knowledge as at one point the slave boy believed he was write, but wasn’t. Plato comes to say that even though one may have true belief in something he still may not truly know that that something is true.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plato Defends Rationalism
    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato Defends Rationalism

    Plato was a highly educated Athenian Philosopher. He lived from 428-348 B.C. Plato spent the early portion of his life as a disciple to Socrates, which undoubtedly helped shape his philosophical theories. One topic that he explored was epistemology. Epistemology is the area of philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge, and that considers various theories of knowledge (Lawhead 52). Plato had extremely distinct rationalistic viewpoints. Rationalism is the claim that reason, or intellect, is the primary source of our fundamental knowledge about reality (55). By examining Plato’s philosophical position on the three basic epistemological questions, as well as analyzing his ability to justify the three anchor points of rationalism, it is clear to see that Plato was successful in defending rationalism.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ‘Without a pre-determined conceptual scheme our sense impressions would be unintelligible
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ‘Without a pre-determined conceptual scheme our sense impressions would be unintelligible

    Empiricists believe that our minds can be compared to a tabula rasa, in other words we were born with a mind with a blank slate. From this perspective we are born knowing nothing and we have no innate knowledge or ideas. This theory is disregarded when we realise that with the conceptual scheme there are innate ideas. Kant doesn’t say that we are born with innate knowledge but we that we are born with innate concepts that require experience to become knowledge.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess The Influence Of Nature And Nurture On Early Human Development
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess The Influence Of Nature And Nurture On Early Human Development

    However, a British philosopher John Locke argued human development is determined entirely by experience. He suggested that the mind of a newborn infant begins as a “blank slate”, which is what the infant sees, hears, tastes, and smells. In addition, some behaviorists such as John B. Watson and B.F. Skinner believed that newborn babies can be trained into any kind of adult, and the human development can be easily changed or influenced (John B. Watson and B.F. Skinner,…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who Is John Locke's Empiricism
    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Is John Locke's Empiricism

    The empiricist doctrine was first developed by the English philosopher sir Francis Bacon early in the 17th century, but Locke organized his ideas in an article in 1690 called Essay Concerning Human Understanding. He regarded the mind of a person at birth as a tabula rasa, a blank slate upon which experience brings knowledge, and did not believe in intuition or theories of instinct. Locke also held that all persons are born good, independent, and equal.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Final Reflective Paper
    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Final Reflective Paper

    A. John Locke said “the mind of an infant is a tabula rasa (a blank slate) on which the world writes; all ideas come from experience” (Witt & Mossler, 2010, section 2.1, para. 4).…

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment and the great awakening
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Enlightenment and the great awakening

    In his essay An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke explained that humans learn only from experience. We as humans experience things with our senses and through reflection. His revolutionary view was that we are born knowing nothing at all. At birth, our minds are completely blank, a tabula rasa. Which is why being completely empty can be filled with what we know to be true through experience (History in the Making).…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Are There Any Innate Ideas?
    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Are There Any Innate Ideas?

    Innate ideas are those principles that are found present in the mind at birth as opposed to those which arrive and develop throughout our lives as a result of sensory experience. Whether or not these innate principles exist, holds for many philosophers many important implications. There are many examples of philosophers who at various times in the history of philosophy have put forward this theory in order to locate the source of valid knowledge. Famously, Plato claimed that knowledge procured from the senses is invalid. That the data received is merely a reflection or a shadow of reality and that the pure, true image of reality is imprinted upon our souls before birth. Without the possibility of any innate notions his theory would be implicitly invalid. René Descartes is another of these examples. Descartes asserted in The Meditations that our notion of the existence of the self: cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore I am), the existence of God, and some logical propositions like, from nothing comes nothing are all innate ideas and are all central to his philosophy. He believed that these innate ideas appear to us above all other notions in a way that is ‘clear and distinct’ [2] and that it is these ideas that are the source of all real knowledge. More recently, and in opposition to the already established rationalist movement, which bases itself on the belief that our knowledge of the world is acquired by the use of reason, and that sensory input is inherently unreliable, more a source of error than of knowledge, grew a school of philosophy known as empiricism. John Locke, who has come to be regarded as the chief founding father of this movement launched his attack on innate ideas when he published…

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Innate Knowledge Locke
    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Innate Knowledge Locke

    The thought that humans are born with some sort of innate ideas has been a much debated topic for many years. It is impossible to say if it is true or not, but it is believed true by many people, including some religions. John Locke has several arguments against innate knowledge; among these, the argument that states that if we did in fact possess innate ideas, then everybody would agree on at least one idea. There are no principles that everybody aggress on. Therefore, innate ideas cannot possibly exist. Locke uses the logic of this argument for several different situations such as the argument for moral innate knowledge.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Descartes Theory Wrong
    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is Descartes Theory Wrong

    John Locke, also a philosopher and political theorist of the 17th century, would contend to the idea or theory of Rene Descartes. Locke would say that human knowledge is not natural or inborn; it is rather developed and learned. He indicates that not all human people have this mental knowledge already in their minds. For instance, people who are mentally ill do not have these “innate ideas” in their minds. Since there are abnormalities in their brain circuits they cannot think properly like a normal human person do. So, if ideas are innate in our minds, why does a mentally disabled person do not think like a normal person? This is one of the concepts why Locke thinks that Descartes’ theory is wrong. Locke claims that prior to receiving any…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Locke outlinect
    • 795 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Locke outlinect

    “Rationalism is the thought that appeals to reason or intellect a primary or fundamental source of knowledge or justification.” “It is typically contrasted with empiricism, which appeals to sensory experience as a primary or fundamental source of knowledge or justification.” John Locke argues that, “We come to this world knowing nothing whatsoever.” (Warburton 74). He believes that experience teaches us everything we know. This view is usually known as empiricism, in contrast to innatism, (the theory that some of our knowledge is in born), and to rationalism (the strife that we can achieve knowledge of the world by the power of reason alone).…

    • 795 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics