Preview

Persuasive Speech: Why Student Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1008 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Speech: Why Student Athletes Should Not Be Paid
Jordan Roy
Oral Com
Persuasive Speech

Over decades, Division I athletes have been pouring their heart and soul into their sport they worked so hard for day after day, week after week. For years, athletes’ love of the game has got them to a university where they can showcase their ability and talent. When you are at the Division I level it is more or less a business, and your job is to bring in a profit for the university. A true athlete plays the game out of passion. In recent years, there has been a controversial question that lingers in every athlete’s mind: should students who play a sport get the extra benefit of being paid because they’re a college athlete? The answer is no. Student athletes should not get paid because they receive
…show more content…
“About two percent of high school athletes are awarded athletic scholarships to compete in college” (NCAA, 2011). It is a privilege to get the opportunity to play at the collegiate level, let alone be awarded an athletic scholarship. This opportunity should not be taken for granted. To play at the collegiate level is something all athletes dream of and for most, it is the highest level of competition. After doing some research, I noticed that when asked if student athletes should be paid, the results were split between yes, not sure, and no. Student-athletes being paid would only create more of a problem for other athletes, students, and universities. Student-athletes are already being paid from the scholarship and other benefits from the university. The scholarship includes tuition, books, food, and housing. An article published online at ncaa.org states that scholarships on average are over $100,000 a year (The Sport Digest, 2002-2010). On top of a scholarship, student athletes are given other benefits such as free tutors, scheduling benefits, trainers, strength and conditioning coaches, free facilities, clothes, and equipment. At some universities all the extra benefits that athletes receive can total $200,000 over all four years (The Sport Digest, 2002-2010). If the athletic scholarship and all the benefits were to be added together, student athletes are making over $150,000 a …show more content…
It’s the students’ name the universities are selling and making profits from. However, fans are just trying to show support and the scholarships are beneficial enough that a student doesn’t need to be paid. As soon as athletes start being paid, the universities will become popular to athletes because of how much they are paying the athlete instead of who can offer the best education. Athletic departments will start talking to athletes about business deals and negotiating money. A negotiation between a potential college athlete and coach could be the coach offering the athlete a full ride plus an extra $3,000 a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    $53.4 Million the combined salary of the top 15 paid coaches in division 1 college football, $0 the combined salary of all student-athletes. Over the past few decades, college athletics have gained popularity across the United States. Whether it is football, basketball, or baseball, ever since the turn of the century, intercollegiate sports have brought in a surplus of revenue to their respective Universities. A recent study found that the University of Texas’ Athletic Program had the highest revenue of any other University at a little over $120 million. Yet with this large sum of money, NO college athletes are legally compensated for their work. According to NCAA rules, “You are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever: Taken pay or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport”. While it may seem odd and unjust to pay college athletes, the reality is that compensation of such athletes is a necessity not only to keep competition at a steady level in college athletics, but also to encourage students to graduate and get their college degrees.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Playing a college sport is like a full time job, except the lack of financial benefits. College football and men’s basketball generate revenue of more than $6 billion every year, yet no money goes toward paying the people that make the sports possible (Bagaria). College sports would be non-existent without the devoted athletes who work hard and spend countless hours each and every day. Whether practicing, training, or playing in games, these athletes are involved in their sport all seven days of the week. College athletes put in almost the same amount of work as professional players do, but instead of making millions, rather they are receiving no financial benefits (Bagaria). College athletes deserve to be paid because they sacrifice so much for their team and deserve compensation. Secondly, college athletes not only deserve money because of their devotion, they also need it for their everyday life. During their athletic season, they do not receive any sort of payment for their efforts which would aide them financially and in everyday life (Bagaria). Most scholarships cover cost of housing and textbooks, but leave out basics such as food. Logically athletes need food, but their time and energy is spent on a “job” as an athlete…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Approximately every year 1 billion dollars in athletic scholarships are given out, because of this college athletes should not be paid. College athletes should not be paid because there’s not enough money to give scholarships and pay the athletes at the same time.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletes bring schools income due to their abilities, should they get compensated or have they already been? College athletes are taken advantage of by not getting compensated for their performance and likeness. Athletes are given free tuition to get a college education and are provided opportunities. Shouldn’t these opportunities count as benefits for the students? They should use these benefits to better themselves and take advantage of their abilities? Student Athletes shouldn’t be paid for their likeness..…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The notion of paying college athletes has been an ongoing and controversial debate for student-athletes, coaches, schools, media and most certainly the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Many would argue that playing major college sports is more like a job versus an extracurricular activity. As with the majority of many student athletes, some attend college with the aspiration of becoming professional players thereby college is seen as a means to end. Although student-athletes already receive compensation via full and partial scholarships to participate at the college level, passionate conversations will continue to be a topic of debate because of the enormous revenue generated by college sports.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athletes Pay

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scholarships that's student athletes receive to play sports in college do not cover the full cost of college universities. In the world of sports , starting from high school a scholarship is an ideal dream of any athlete at any capacity. Scholarships are deemed as a free education and oppurtunity to play at the next level. In the article , "Cash , Check , or Charge ?" The author underlies athletes who receive a "full" scholarship covers room , board , books , tuitions , and fees. All universities estimate that the actual cost if attendance runs between $1500 to $2500. This goes on to disprove , the evolution of why should the NCAA pay college athletes for free question. Whether the athlete walks-on , receives a partial scholarship , or a full ride they'll be paying to attend college and to receive an education. In "Cash , Check , or Charge ? " author Douglas Looney claims "the basic reasons to pay collegiate athletes is that schools and boosters can't be stopped from doing what they do anyway" (n.p). Student-athletes would be less likely to violate NCAA rules by receiving money from sponsors that allocate larger violations for the college-university because receiving money or incentives from boosters results in NCAA infractions and loss of athletes eligibility . If the NCAA allowed stipends or a salary student athletes would no longer run to boosters for bare necessities such as food , clothes , etc. They would have already been provided with enough money to accomplish their…

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “But, is money such a big problem for these student-athletes? Don't they receive scholarships? How much more money do they need?” (Meshefejian). College athletes getting paid is a big issue because it leads to many question on if they do get paid or don’t. If college athletes got paid they would have to deal with how much they should get paid and who gets paid the most. But many that say they should get paid is because they raise a lot of money for their schools and Tv programs. They also say they should because they don’t have enough money to afford food and things they need. I agree they do need extra money but everybody thats in college are not athletes.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are extensive amounts of controversy in our society today, such as whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. Even though college athletes receive many luxuries they still have to make there own living and support themselves. As reported by “Pay or Scholarship” written by Teengagement, it states, “Athletes are employees because they work under the control of the college.” As many people know a business has employees, if an athlete can be considered an employee to the college shouldn't they be paid like and employee? Everyone in the world has expenses they need to pay -granted a college athlete has housing and meals and all that stuff- however many of them still need money to buy things such as: toiletries, new clothes, gas, and spending money.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I’m going to start by saying that I am a college athlete and it’s very interesting the number of people fighting and defending the topic if players should be paid. The price for college has never been higher and will only continue to grow as time goes on. Going along with that college athletics have never been more popular. The most prominent example would be a division 1 football program. Back in 1906, when the NCAA was created, a law was put in place to prevent exactly this. This law is called the “Amateurism clause” which states that no athlete may receive a salary for participating in athletics or engage with professional sports teams while in the NCAA. The clause goes on to say that the player(s) may not receive any profit from autograph…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years, many colleges have dealt with much controversy over whether or not athletes should be paid additionally to play sports in college. There are strong arguments supporting both sides of this issue. I believe there is validity for both sides of this argument. However, through research I have done it is my belief that it is dangerous to pay college athletes in addition to their scholarships. Paying college athletes would be harmful for everyone involved, especially for the student athletes themselves.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether or not college athletes should get paid has been a controversial question for a while now. Twenty years ago there were only six sports related channels on television. Today, there are over 150. This is mainly due to college athletics, ranging from football, men’s and women’s basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball. This fact alone would make one question why the profits are not going to the hard-working athletes. They are the ones who make the main event possible. Without the athletes, there would be no game. They are the entertainment that the crowd is paying for and they receive none of the profit.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are college athlete’s players or employees? The idea of paying a college athlete appears to be outrageous to some. The thought of giving someone money for something they have chosen to do may not appear to be fair. The greatest concern is where to draw the line. Should the decision be based on the amount of money and fame the program generates? Why should athletes be treated special and receive compensation for their contribution to the school? One major factor is that athletes make numerous sacrifices beyond that of a nonathletic student. Many athletes can’t seek employment to help offset the expenses of college because they are on the field or court for the majority of their day. Their time and effort is devoted to that of the school, thus potentially sacrificing their education. In many cases, athletes don’t receive funding for college, which means that not only are they paying financially, but physically to compete. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. If the athletes are fortunate enough to receive a scholarship, usually that is the only benefit. This in turn leads to taking out loans and having to look for other scholarships or sources of compensation, but this doesn’t stop them from being involved in the teams’ activities. The real question is why shouldn’t an athlete in college be paid to play? College athletes are the real moneymakers for the school, and they should be paid to play.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered about being a college athlete and getting paid? I have never wondered about this because college athletes should not paid for playing sports. I understand that some people believe that college athletes should get paid because it more money for them to depend on while there in college. College athletes shouldn’t get paid for playing sports because it would be unfair to other students if the college paid athletes to play college sports. Most college athletes receives scholarships. Getting paid to be a college athlete also takes the focus off of their education.…

    • 672 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Athletic departments in colleges nationwide generate massive revenue and depend on the success of their athletes for income. For example, the Southeastern Conference became the first conference in 2010 to earn over $1 billion in athletic receipts, Taylor Branch wrote in The Atlantic last year. The Big Ten was a close second with earnings close to $905 million, he wrote” (Rebecca Barry n.p.). Opposers of paying college athletes always seem to complain “Athletes are already on scholarships, they don’t need to get paid “when in fact scholarships exceeding $20,000 may seem like a lot but in reality it only covers tuition, housing, a meal plan, and textbooks (Tyson Hartnett n.p.). No matter what type of scholarship college athletes are normally dead broke. But top NCAA executives make 1 million dollars a year; coaches on average make $100,000 a year plus bonuses for wins, records, etc. (Tyson Hartnett n.p.). Opposers also say “It is unfair to students who are paying tuition and don’t get paid to go there, for athletes to get scholarships and to get paid to go there”(Anna Simmons n.p.). When in fact the non-athletes are not bringing in money to the school like the athletes are. Universities bring in millions of dollars every year with their athletic programs through donations, ticket sales, media rights, advertising, ect. Colleges make all this money, yet most of it is not used for the benefit of the college athletes (21 Reasons…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays